期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | Earth System Science Data LetPub Score 8.5
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 9.1 Influence 7.9 Speed 8.5 | ||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | EARTH SYST SCI DATA | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1866-3508 | ||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1866-3516 | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | 38 | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 4.50%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://earth-system-science-data.net/ | ||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://administrator.copernicus.org/authentication.php | ||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Copernicus Publications | ||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY | ||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | GERMANY | ||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | |||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 260每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 99.63% | ||||||||||||||||
OA Related Info | APC: Yes( EUR1400; ) APC waiver:Check Notes Other charges: No Keywords: atmosphere、oceanography、biosphere、cryosphere、geology、hydrology Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardOpen peer review | ||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1866-3508%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: 35 Weeks | ||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: | ||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[Earth System Science Data] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: An_apple_a_day 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-16 16:12:43 評論於 The MS record can show whether reviewers have been found. If they have been found but have not responded, please send an email to the editor to assign someone else.(0) 讚! | An_apple_a_day |
作者: An_apple_a_day 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-16 16:10:30 評論於 24 Jul 2024 File upload 17 Aug 2024 Topic editor initial decision: Start review and discussion 19 Aug 2024 Preprint posted 19 Aug 2024 Discussion started, expected end 23 Oct 2024 | The primal end of discussion was 07 Oct 2024 25 Oct 2024 Final response 11 Nov 2024 Topic editor decision: Publish as is 12 Nov 2024 File upload 15 Nov 2024 Production file validation completed It went relatively smoothly. It was difficult to find reviewers, but the editorial process was slow, with an average of about a week for each step. It took a month to find reviewers, reviewers generally have around three weeks, revisions took two weeks (two minors), and the editorial process took another week to accept. However, it also takes 1.5 - 2 months from acceptance to publication.(0) 讚! | An_apple_a_day |
作者: www 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-15 14:24:24 評論於 It has been almost five months since submission, but I still haven't received any feedback from the reviewers. The review process keeps getting delayed. Do we have no choice but to wait indefinitely?(0) 讚! | www |
作者: WesleyLiu6 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-09 09:36:40 評論於 Topical editor nomination by chief editor (ESSD discussions) rejected after over a month for not being within the scope of the journal, with slow processing speed, submissions should be made carefully.(0) 讚! | WesleyLiu6 |
作者: WesleyLiu6 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-09 09:29:43 評論於 After being sent to the topic editor for nearly two months, it was rejected on the grounds of not meeting the scope of the journal. The processing speed is extremely slow, so submissions should be made carefully.(0) 讚! | WesleyLiu6 |
作者: YUAN007 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-12 17:57:02 評論於 It's been 3 months already, I've reminded several times, but still no response(0) 讚! | YUAN007 |
作者: lsasdf 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-12 17:51:26 評論於 The submission was made on March 12th, and a topic editor was assigned. After sending a reminder email once, three months had passed and the topic editor was finally assigned on June 10th. The speed of this process is quite exaggerated. Hopefully, there can be further discussion(0) 讚! | lsasdf |
作者: 雨过无尘 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-01 00:40:38 評論於 I can't help but comment on this. This magazine has already reviewed and accepted several articles, but the efficiency is really dangerously low. It takes an average of 45 days to find an associate editor, and another 15 days for the associate editor to decide on submission. So just the decision to submit takes an average of 2 months now... Currently, two articles are in submission process, with one still looking for a second reviewer for a year, and the other having just found the second reviewer after 10 months. The efficiency at every stage is extremely low(0) 讚! | 雨过无尘 |
作者: storm_pika 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-04-02 17:48:36 評論於 My status is this, topical editor nomination by chief editor (essd discussions). Can I ask how long has this status been going on? And what does this status mean? Thank you for the explanation, OP!(0) 讚! | storm_pika |
作者: boym2010 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-04-13 19:13:16 評論於 The chief editor in charge of the manuscript has been assigned, but the chief editor has not taken over yet.(0) 讚! | boym2010 |
作者: 温柔善良帅气 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-04-13 11:17:37 評論於 May I ask if "in review" means it is still with the editor for editing or if it has been sent for review? Additionally, in another interface, it states: Status: Topical editor nomination by chief editor (ESSD Discussions). It has been almost half a month now, what is the current status?(0) 讚! | 温柔善良帅气 |
作者: giermeng 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 8.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2022-09-22 16:55:06 評論於 The initial review was quite strict, and now it has become even stricter. After submission, not only do you need to respond to the reviewer's comments, but you also need to engage in an interactive discussion. This is also a major trend. Both the code and data need to be provided, emphasizing the quality and utilization of the data.(2) 讚! | giermeng |
作者: 中中中678 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-03-29 10:18:09 評論於 The DOI number is obtained when you store your data in a public database.(0) 讚! | 中中中678 |
作者: Enlighten_qm 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-02-16 10:33:55 評論於 Does this journal charge a fee for submission?(0) 讚! | Enlighten_qm |
作者: 豆子 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-23 15:22:15 評論於 10.18 received 12.16 started discussing and posting preprint ...... 2022.6, rejected after re-review Both initial reviewers recommended rejection, editor requested revisions. For re-review, new reviewers were sought, one requested major revisions while the other recommended rejection, resulting in final rejection. Overall, the process took a very long time, and some reviewers were very mean.(2) 讚! | 豆子 |
作者: hnzk 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2021-11-22 17:16:04 評論於 The journal is not bad overall, but the impact factor is artificially inflated, which makes people very uneasy, similar to LDD in the previous years.(33) 讚! | hnzk |
作者: chatinger 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2021-11-21 11:28:36 評論於 Highly recognized journals in the industry. They mainly publish large-scale datasets or maps. The topical handling editor has significant authority and strict requirements for the content and quality of the articles. Prior to external review, the editor already provides many revision suggestions. They have their unique review process and manuscript template, and it is necessary to strictly organize the content according to the journal's requirements. Once the external review (entering the discussion stage) is submitted, the chances of acceptance are relatively high.(16) 讚! | chatinger |
作者: chatinger 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-11-21 11:20:15 評論於 Can't help but say a few words. The original poster may be a big shot in the industry, but please consider the bitterness of us bottom-level research workers. With an impact factor of 11, being the second-ranked journal out of 200 in the field of geosciences, the journal is being referred to by the original poster as a scam and submitting articles to it is considered exploiting loopholes. I would like to ask if there are any journals in any field that have an impact factor of over 10, publish fewer than 200 articles per year, and are still considered scam journals? The original poster claims that high citation rates of GCP articles boost the overall impact factor, but this is a concept switch. Can you provide an example of a journal where only a few articles have high citation rates? Even in reputable journals like CNS, there are also a large number of articles with extremely low citation rates. According to the original poster's perspective, are those authors also exploiting and deceiving their leaders? Except for the three GCP articles in ESSD, the original poster cannot see the abundance of excellent articles and data, and based solely on their limited understanding, spreads such opinions on the internet. I checked the WoS data and found that in terms of the number of articles published in ESSD, Chinese authors rank only fifth, with research workers from the United States, Germany, France, and England ahead of them. Are they all deceiving their leaders too, according to the original poster's perspective? According to the original poster's view, how many people in China are actually doing legitimate research?(1) 讚! | chatinger |
作者: 慧慧哎呦呵 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-08-17 22:44:41 評論於 I would like to ask you about the submission process. Do I need to publish the data first before submitting? I noticed that the data requires a DOI number. How can I obtain that?(0) 讚! | 慧慧哎呦呵 |
作者: 小凡凡5566 領域: 地学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2020-03-01 14:59:27 評論於 This journal is good, but every year, the budget articles of GCP greatly increased the impact factor of this journal. So in fact, this journal has an impact factor of 4 to 5 at most. Those who fools the school leaders can submit, but those have real talents should consider twice before submission. You’d better study (how to make an article published in) the top journal in specialty than have a mood of opportunism. (40) 讚! | 小凡凡5566 |
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us