The editor was very nice. He didn’t reject my manuscript because of the low-level errors that the format did not fully meet the requirements of the journal at the submission stage, but just notified a revision. I shall have to doublecheck in future submissions to reduce low-level errors that may affect the first impression. The review speed of this journal is much faster than those of BMC that I previously submitted to. A major revision was recommended 2 months later. A minor revision was required 20 days after the revised submission. It was accepted 15 days later.

(5) 讚！ | wenjing

Review speed: 2.0
Experience sharing: The editor is very nice. For minor errors that do not completely meet the magazine's requirements when submitting the manuscript, they did not immediately reject it, but notified for revision. In the future, it is still necessary to check repeatedly when submitting a manuscript to reduce minor errors and impact the first impression. The review time of this journal is much faster than the original bmc series submission. They provided major revision comments in 2 months, returned minor revisions in about 20 days, and accepted the article in fifteen days

(0) 讚！ | 是迎蕊吖

The review efficiency was low; the review comments were very helpful to the improvement of the article.

(2) 讚！ | 彩色熊猫

Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: The current review efficiency is low, and the review comments are very helpful for improving the article

(0) 讚！ | 五郎梓奥