I was lucky to have my submission accepted on the first try. The editors and reviewers were very professional and their questions were very pertinent.

8.21 Submission
8.26 Initial review by editorial department
9.25 Feedback from four experts
10.22 Acceptance
10.8 Final review completed

(0) 讚！ | Mr.Liang

Journals have high requirements for industry hotspots or major breakthroughs in oil and gas exploration and development. In the past, submissions were consistently rejected immediately, but upon careful analysis, it was found that the depth of the articles was insufficient, rather than solely due to the journal's reasons (although this cannot be ruled out). Submissions were later improved after focusing on a specific direction and careful revisions, leading to acceptance. Reviewers are usually experts in the field with high requirements for the scope of submitted articles; their reviews are sincere and strict. It is advisable to be cautious when submitting purely academic research, articles that do not address breakthrough hotspots in exploration and development, or articles that are not relevant to the field.

(1) 讚！ | 9828

After four reviewers have completed the revisions, no further comments will be provided for rejection

(0) 讚！ | gw905

Rejected without reason, first time seeing a rejection without explanation

(1) 讚！ | nntt

Let me share my experience. In the first round, there were four experts and over ten opinions. In the second round, there was only one opinion. Three months later, my submission was rejected without any reasons provided

(0) 讚！ | 秦风

Before submitting, take a look at the recently published articles, especially the author's affiliation. If your article's author is not included, consider it carefully and don't waste time.

(4) 讚！ | 武痴马保国

May I ask if there is a submission fee for this journal?

(0) 讚！ | CMJ0207

If the impact factor is lower than JPSE, it is a mandatory adjustment to be in the first tier. It's really not worth considering anything else. Most of the connections are influential and there are many mediocre articles. If you submit to JPSE, you will be permanently blacklisted.

(4) 讚！ | lyq2020

I submitted an article in 2020, but it was rejected in the second review a month later. After carefully reviewing it, I realized that the quality of the article was indeed lacking. I made some revisions and submitted it to JPSE (two reviewers, one disagreed), EF (two reviewers, one disagreed). Currently, I have submitted it to Colloids Surface A (under external review). On November 24, 2021, I submitted another article, this time with more effort and improvements. It was sent for external review on the same day, but the results are still unknown. After reading everyone's comments, I feel extremely nervous and anxiously await good news. In my advisor's words, "Good luck" crying, crying, crying.

(413) 讚！ | 帅出拉风的感觉

Four or five reviewers made several rounds of revisions without any objections, but the editor-in-chief still rejected the manuscript without providing any feedback. It can hardly be considered an international journal, as it is unfair. They don't want your article, even if the review comments are good; they will continue to send it for review until they find a quirky reviewer who can justify rejecting it. They also don't send the reviews at the same time, but one by one, haha. They are just playing with you. So, you need to have a good mindset. Unfortunately, that's how it is.

(71) 讚！ | aloha2021

Anyone have idea of how long it will take this journal to finish the process?

(0) 讚！ | Fun

This journal is a crappy publication run by state-owned enterprises. It is infested with parasites. If an external organization submits an article, it doesn't matter. You guys at the Institute of Rock Mechanics will just play tricks on them until they give up!!! 

I personally think it is a great piece of work. I submitted it almost a year ago, but there were no substantial review comments. However, I was told it was rejected with just one sentence: "This journal does not accept it." They didn't provide any reasons. Disgusting. And it claims to be SCI, what a disgrace to its reputation. No wonder it didn't even make it into the Excellent Journal Action Plan. It serves them right. I will never submit to it again. I have already submitted it to Petroleum Science, which is currently under minor revisions. I really don't recommend submitting to this journal.

(218) 讚！ | zasphalt

Downstairs is indeed the experience of most people. This journal’s level is actually only average in SCI journals. The opinions for rejecting manuscripts can hardly be read, without respecting the authors at all. Don’t submit.

(112) 讚！ | jinx的微笑

Oh, a Q1 journal! A top journal! Respond to the call for "excellent articles published at home"!

(46) 讚！ | rick

has three external auditors' opinions in the first instance. The opinions are quite good. They need to be changed little. They have been modified and returned to the editorial department. They enter the review stage. When you see your comments, I feel awkward. The review shows that it is 2 weeks.I don't know if I can be included in the

(0) 讚！ | zshell@sina.com

Although it was eventually acceptd, I think this is a metamorphosis journal. I feel that we are used to these domestic journals.The slower journals will not give results until one year. Fortunately, I have not rejected them after one year.

(0) 讚！ | gaodao

without any opinion, the impact factor is the third in the world, funny, finally not the TOP, will not come again引救救

(0) 讚！ | cc

After reviewing the manuscript, even if the comments were not given, it was a very exhausting journal.

(0) 讚！ | zoucwupc@163.com

The round of views is very good,No comments were rejected in the second round.Delayed time, very speechless, refused to give such a good round of opinion.

(2) 讚！ | zhangboupc@126.com

Congratulations, the influence factor has risen greatly under the super high self-introduction rate, but be careful how to reduce the number of journals by

(2) 讚！ | PED

I really don’t know how this journal got in SCI. Other SCI journals all give detailed review comments when rejecting paper. At this journal, there were detailed comments during the first review. But when rejecting a paper during the second round of review, it was just “According to the review of external experts and discussion by the editorial office, your paper will not be accepted for publication.” There are no comments for the second round; this is typical black-box operation. Academic anti-counterfeiting should investigate such journals. How did the articles from their own institution get accepted? How many papers were rejected without giving comments?

(8) 讚！ | xiao yi

two months, there is no movement, I do not know what is the situation, there is no way to query, the submission system needs to be improved!

(0) 讚！ | anmy186@sohu.com

The review is fast, and there are not many professional opinions.

(1) 讚！ | zhangboupc@126.com