X
    學術可視化工作室RC   登錄   提交文稿
學術英文編修

PeerJ

期刊標題檢索 PEERJ 最新評論: What money do you want to pay? (2025-03-28)


期刊名稱:   ISSN:   主題領域:   影響因子範圍: -
索引:   類別:   開放訪問:   排序方式:

[PeerJ]您好,您是該頁面的第 697800 位訪客。

期刊簡介
期刊名稱PeerJ PeerJ
LetPub Score
6.7
56 ratings
Rate

Reputation
7.0

Influence
5.9

Speed
7.9

期刊簡稱PEERJ
ISSN2167-8359
h-index45
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
4.700.6230.799
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Q149 / 221
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Q283 / 221
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: General Neuroscience
Q364 / 113

自引率 (2023-2024)4.30%自引率趨勢
掲載範囲
PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
官方網站https://peerj.com/
在線稿件提交https://peerj.com/login
開放訪問Yes
出版商PeerJ Inc.
主題領域MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
出版國/地區ENGLAND
發行頻率
創刊年0
每年文章數2142每年文章數趨勢
黃金OA百分比98.63%
OA Related Info
APC: Yes( USD1395; )
APC waiver:Check Notes
Other charges: No
Keywords: biomedical、health、genetics、ecology、biology
Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardAnonymous peer review
Web of Science 四分位
2023-2024
WOS Quartile: Q2

CategoryEditionJIF QuartileJIF RankingJIF Percentage
MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCESSCIEQ248/134
索引 (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2167-8359%5BISSN%5D
平均審稿時間 *來自出版商的數據:
來自作者的數據: 10 Weeks
競爭力 *來自作者的數據:
參考鏈接
相關期刊 【PeerJ】CiteScore趨勢
自引率趨勢 每年文章數趨勢
作者評論
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。
  • 同一學科的期刊
  • CiteScore趨勢
  • 自引率趨勢
  • 每年文章數趨勢
  •  
    學科內的可信期刊 影響因子
    NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGYH-index: 386

    CiteScore: 173.60
    NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGYH-index: 250

    CiteScore: 74.00
    CELLH-index: 705

    CiteScore: 110.00
    NATURE REVIEWS GENETICSH-index: 320

    CiteScore: 57.40
    NATURE METHODSH-index: 257

    CiteScore: 58.70
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGYH-index: 399

    CiteScore: 63.00
    NATURE GENETICSH-index: 527

    CiteScore: 43.00
    CELL RESEARCHH-index: 143

    CiteScore: 53.90
    Cell MetabolismH-index: 219

    CiteScore: 48.60
    FUNGAL DIVERSITYH-index: 80

    CiteScore: 44.80
    學科內最受檢索的期刊 頁面查看次數
    Frontiers in Plant Science888046
    Frontiers in Microbiology817440
    BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS706956
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY646017
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS612706
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY592526
    FASEB JOURNAL531301
    BMC GENOMICS481989
    APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY417002
    ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY404998
  •  

    PeerJ PeerJ
    明年預測:
    穩步上升 無變化 逐步下降  刷新
  •  

     
  •  

     


首頁    上一頁    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/34)
  [PeerJ] 的評論撰寫評論
作者: LXD and XDL


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2025-03-28 15:19:52 評論於
What money do you want to pay?
(0) 讚! | LXD and XDL

作者: 闻言


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 6.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2025-03-26 10:47:07 評論於
Payment must be made before proceeding to the next step.
(0) 讚! | 闻言

作者: 闻言


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 6.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2025-03-26 10:46:15 評論於
The gel image and blot image both need to be uncut.
(0) 讚! | 闻言

作者: tulala


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2025-03-25 22:04:28 評論於
Do I need to pay a fee after submitting a contribution in order for it to be reviewed?
(0) 讚! | tulala

作者: moshiqi


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2025-03-06 11:30:09 評論於
Organizing raw data, various tables, checklists, and making databases public took almost a month, only to be rejected in seconds... directly deemed unsuitable. Couldn't this have been communicated earlier to save time? Submitted for the first time on 2.10; required to modify information + raw data on 2.14; resubmitted on 2.18; author confirmed on 2.22; required to provide ARRIVE2.0 form and make the database public on 2.28; resubmitted on 3.5; rejected on 3.6 (unsuitable).
(0) 讚! | moshiqi

作者: nicaia


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2025-02-17 21:02:19 評論於
How were everyone's agreements resolved, submitted several times but still rejected? Can you provide more details on this?
(0) 讚! | nicaia

作者: LXD and XDL


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2025-01-14 09:07:38 評論於
How about it? Do all authors have to confirm?
(0) 讚! | LXD and XDL

作者: kua


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2025-01-06 09:52:55 評論於
Are the three co-authors yet to be confirmed going to affect the article's progression from checking to Under review stage?
(0) 讚! | kua

作者: kua


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2025-01-06 09:51:52 評論於
Are there several co-authors who have not been confirmed yet, will this affect the article from moving from checking to under review?
(0) 讚! | kua

作者: 暴风琦珍


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-10-29 12:25:58 評論於
Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Emphasis on research direction: pancreatic cancer; Meta-analysis sharing experience: I am now writing my experience. Currently in the fourth year, the first SCI paper in the third year, which was really poorly written at the time, I didn't understand a lot, I was feeling my way across the river, and my supervisor had never done a meta-analysis, so he could only provide me with support for publication fees (but I was already very grateful). The editor and reviewers probably realized that I had no experience, and in the first round, I received nearly 80 major revision comments. After working on it for nearly a month, I couldn't understand many of the review comments, and I asked for a long time. The reviewers and editors were very patient, and even a whole paragraph of results was incorrectly stated, which reviewer 1 directly told me how to change. After the major revisions, reviewers 1 and 2 had no further comments, and reviewer 3 added a few minor issues. After minor revisions, it was accepted a month later. I now have a filter for this journal hhh, reviewers 1 and 2 gave me a lot of comments on writing style and expression, and now I am quite proficient. After the fourth year, both the core journals of Peking University and SCI have been accepted very smoothly, and even the core journal of Peking University was accepted in just one month. I really want to thank these two reviewers for helping me break through the barriers!
(0) 讚! | 暴风琦珍

作者: 闻言


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 6.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-10-15 10:14:16 評論於
May I ask if PeerJ will provide a unit reimbursement receipt or relevant payment voucher after paying the layout fee with Alipay? If not, who should I inquire with?
(0) 讚! | 闻言

作者: 闻言


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 6.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2024-10-15 09:55:04 評論於
May I ask if PeerJ will provide a unit receipt or relevant payment voucher after paying the submission fee through Alipay? Thank you.
(0) 讚! | 闻言

作者: letpubodradek


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-10-05 12:11:28 評論於
The longer the time in review, the higher the probability of being sent for approval.
(0) 讚! | letpubodradek

作者: letpubodradek


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-10-05 12:10:28 評論於
Try sending an email to the head of the company, Pete. You can find his email on the official website, and he usually replies quickly.
(0) 讚! | letpubodradek

作者: letpubodradek


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-10-05 12:09:43 評論於
Try sending an email to ask the head of the department, Pete.
(0) 讚! | letpubodradek

作者: sunzilin


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 10.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-09-26 20:27:07 評論於
After registering, I can't log in, and I also didn't receive the confirmation email. It's really weird. And when I ask for technical support, they don't reply.
(0) 讚! | sunzilin

作者: 华山晴文


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-09-18 15:00:20 評論於
Has your article been published? How long did it take for the second review to send you an email? It's been about two and a half months since my second review, and I still haven't received a reply. I don't dare to follow up either.
(0) 讚! | 华山晴文

作者: 筒学长


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2024-09-17 17:54:57 評論於
Animal basic experiments. Before submission, I heard that this journal has high requirements for original data and various checklists need to be filled out. After spending a long time preparing psychologically and organizing data for a month, packaging it, filling out various forms required by the journal, the result was an instant rejection. The experiment was approved by the ethics of the school and hospital, but the journal said it did not meet the ethics of the journal. After arguing with the editor, it was still rejected.
(0) 讚! | 筒学长

作者: 回风念南


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-09-12 16:21:05 評論於
It has been 3 weeks since submission for review.
(0) 讚! | 回风念南

作者: 回风念南


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-09-01 20:20:51 評論於
Please translate the following passage into English: 2 weeks
(0) 讚! | 回风念南

作者: 回风念南


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-08-30 18:01:14 評論於
My submission is due in 2 weeks, and it is currently the 9th day of the submission.
(0) 讚! | 回风念南

作者: Audrey Doherty


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-08-18 19:57:40 評論於
The format review has been dragging on for half a month... If you are in a hurry, please submit with caution, it's just too frustrating.
(0) 讚! | Audrey Doherty

作者: chifan


領域: 农林科学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-08-16 19:17:50 評論於
I'm too lazy to talk about this magazine. The level of the editors and reviewers almost made me laugh to tears. The reviewers don't understand at all, and reviewers 2 and 3 just copied the opinions of reviewer 1, it's a mess. They're talking about things that don't even need to be explained in undergraduate papers. Did they hire a bunch of freshmen as reviewers? And the formatting requirements of this magazine, catering to colorblind individuals, the color scheme must meet their requirements before submission, otherwise it will be continuously rejected. Such inhumane requirements? If the audience for plant-related articles is colorblind, why are you writing about plants? Do you think you're publishing in Nature? Such a ridiculous magazine. For a simple qPCR, you have to provide an excessive amount of information. You should just stop publishing this magazine and focus on educating elementary school students.
(0) 讚! | chifan

作者: Audrey Doherty


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-08-16 08:23:34 評論於
Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Oh my god, the formatting requirements of this journal are too troublesome. Data uploading and checking are particularly strict, they need to be placed in a public database and provide a link. During checking, the original data uploaded will be checked one by one, requiring detailed explanations, which is very time-consuming...
(0) 讚! | Audrey Doherty

作者: 留云曼凝


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-08-12 16:29:42 評論於
Please resubmit in an email.
(0) 讚! | 留云曼凝

首頁    上一頁    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/34)

開始撰寫 [PeerJ] 的評論:





Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*