Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Emphasis on research direction: pancreatic cancer; Meta-analysis sharing experience: I am now writing my experience. Currently in the fourth year, the first SCI paper in the third year, which was really poorly written at the time, I didn't understand a lot, I was feeling my way across the river, and my supervisor had never done a meta-analysis, so he could only provide me with support for publication fees (but I was already very grateful). The editor and reviewers probably realized that I had no experience, and in the first round, I received nearly 80 major revision comments. After working on it for nearly a month, I couldn't understand many of the review comments, and I asked for a long time. The reviewers and editors were very patient, and even a whole paragraph of results was incorrectly stated, which reviewer 1 directly told me how to change. After the major revisions, reviewers 1 and 2 had no further comments, and reviewer 3 added a few minor issues. After minor revisions, it was accepted a month later. I now have a filter for this journal hhh, reviewers 1 and 2 gave me a lot of comments on writing style and expression, and now I am quite proficient. After the fourth year, both the core journals of Peking University and SCI have been accepted very smoothly, and even the core journal of Peking University was accepted in just one month. I really want to thank these two reviewers for helping me break through the barriers!

(0) 讚！ | 暴风琦珍

May I ask if PeerJ will provide a unit reimbursement receipt or relevant payment voucher after paying the layout fee with Alipay? If not, who should I inquire with?

(0) 讚！ | 闻言

May I ask if PeerJ will provide a unit receipt or relevant payment voucher after paying the submission fee through Alipay? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 闻言

The longer the time in review, the higher the probability of being sent for approval.

(0) 讚！ | letpubodradek

Try sending an email to the head of the company, Pete. You can find his email on the official website, and he usually replies quickly.

(0) 讚！ | letpubodradek

Try sending an email to ask the head of the department, Pete.

(0) 讚！ | letpubodradek

After registering, I can't log in, and I also didn't receive the confirmation email. It's really weird. And when I ask for technical support, they don't reply.

(0) 讚！ | sunzilin

Has your article been published? How long did it take for the second review to send you an email? It's been about two and a half months since my second review, and I still haven't received a reply. I don't dare to follow up either.

(0) 讚！ | 华山晴文

Animal basic experiments. Before submission, I heard that this journal has high requirements for original data and various checklists need to be filled out. After spending a long time preparing psychologically and organizing data for a month, packaging it, filling out various forms required by the journal, the result was an instant rejection. The experiment was approved by the ethics of the school and hospital, but the journal said it did not meet the ethics of the journal. After arguing with the editor, it was still rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 筒学长

It has been 3 weeks since submission for review.

(0) 讚！ | 回风念南

Please translate the following passage into English: 2 weeks

(0) 讚！ | 回风念南

My submission is due in 2 weeks, and it is currently the 9th day of the submission.

(0) 讚！ | 回风念南

The format review has been dragging on for half a month... If you are in a hurry, please submit with caution, it's just too frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | Audrey Doherty

I'm too lazy to talk about this magazine. The level of the editors and reviewers almost made me laugh to tears. The reviewers don't understand at all, and reviewers 2 and 3 just copied the opinions of reviewer 1, it's a mess. They're talking about things that don't even need to be explained in undergraduate papers. Did they hire a bunch of freshmen as reviewers? And the formatting requirements of this magazine, catering to colorblind individuals, the color scheme must meet their requirements before submission, otherwise it will be continuously rejected. Such inhumane requirements? If the audience for plant-related articles is colorblind, why are you writing about plants? Do you think you're publishing in Nature? Such a ridiculous magazine. For a simple qPCR, you have to provide an excessive amount of information. You should just stop publishing this magazine and focus on educating elementary school students.

(0) 讚！ | chifan

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Oh my god, the formatting requirements of this journal are too troublesome. Data uploading and checking are particularly strict, they need to be placed in a public database and provide a link. During checking, the original data uploaded will be checked one by one, requiring detailed explanations, which is very time-consuming...

(0) 讚！ | Audrey Doherty

Please resubmit in an email.

(0) 讚！ | 留云曼凝

Please resubmit at the bottom of the email when making revisions.

(0) 讚！ | 留云曼凝

How is the progress? Is the review going quickly?

(0) 讚！ | shuikanshangan

All four reviews are very good, it's just a language issue. It's been a month since the second review and there has been no progress.

(0) 讚！ | 天震三岁啦

It has been a week since I submitted my contribution. Why is it still in the "Checking" status? What's going on?

(0) 讚！ | fekka

Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 六阳夜绿

You can contact them through this email (authors@peerj.com), or for a quicker response, you can contact their CEO, Dr. Pete Binfield (pete@peerj.com).

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞慕丹

May I ask where to send a letter to inquire about the status of the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 六阳夜绿

May I ask which email should I write to inquire about the status of the article? ?

(0) 讚！ | 六阳夜绿

In this case, the opinions of the two reviewers who have submitted suggestions may be positive and negative, the opinion of the third reviewer who is not good may be returned, and if the opinion is positive, it may require major revisions. If revisions are needed, the negative opinions of the reviewers can be replied to without making changes, as the revised manuscript will only be sent to the two positive reviewers for a second round of review.

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞慕丹