It has been 50 days since submission, and it is still awaiting reviewer scores.

(0) 讚！ | 奥德修斯

6.2 awaiting review's selection: Waiting for the selection of reviews.
6.3 awaiting reviews scores: Waiting for review scores.

Hope everything goes smoothly!

(0) 讚！ | 奥德修斯

5.28 Awaiting Editorial Office Processing

The editor invited my submission and I requested for prompt processing. It has been in this state for a while now. I am eagerly anticipating a quick resolution! The online reviews for this journal are not very positive, so I hope for a favorable outcome.

(0) 讚！ | 奥德修斯

What happened later, bro?

(0) 讚！ | pscutber

It has been a week since the submission, but it has not been assigned to an editor yet. Does it mean it's already a lost cause? Can you please give me a quick response! The vacation is approaching, I want to quickly change my journal submission. Any fellow comrades who have experienced the same situation, please come and vent with me.

(18) 讚！ | pscutber

What kind of group is it? Three articles about AEM? It's not that I don't believe the original poster, I also want to know. Can you provide a link to the article for me to study?

(0) 讚！ | 川大小刘文博

The quality of the magazine has improved now, and the difficulty has also increased. Last year, I submitted an article and felt that the review process was the most rigorous (last year, we submitted 4 articles and only one was accepted, but the other two were published in higher-level journals such as ACS and RSC). The reviewers' comments were not particularly professional, and it was easy to pass. It seems that as long as the editor is willing to review, there shouldn't be any problems.

Unfortunately, domestic journals are rarely noticed by foreign scholars, and the citations in the magazine are also rarely from overseas researchers' research groups. I hope the magazine will continue to improve.

In the early years, the impact factor of the magazine did not increase, so we privately sought citations from others, and there was a reward for each citation. Now that the impact factor of the magazine has increased, I hope this phenomenon will not occur again, as it has a negative impact.

(42) 讚！ | 小琪

I don't know how to evaluate it. It has been more than 10 days since submission, and no editor has been assigned. That's just how domestic journals are.

(45) 讚！ | ikown

Just asking, how many days does it take for the older brother to reject the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | ikown

3 papers as first author in AEM? Small research group? Don't brag.

(0) 讚！ | companyYS

8.17 submitted
9.2 major revision
9.17 revision submitted
10.8 accepted
I am from a small research group, those sour and bragging comments in the comment section, please tone it down.

(426) 讚！ | companyYS

AM sent for review, encountered a peer in a small field, rejected. In the spirit of supporting domestic journals, I submitted to nano micro letters, waited for the editor's handling for 7 days, and then the editor directly rejected it, stating that they had too many submissions and could only select high-quality manuscripts that they believed would have a wide readership. Well, I guess I don't deserve it, even though I have been accepted in 3 AEM papers. This is the most innovative paper I think, otherwise, I wouldn't dare to submit to AM. Now it seems like they look down on domestic papers. With such a low submission rate, you promote yourself everywhere on social media asking everyone to pay attention, but when a small research group submits to you, you look down on it, and you publish whatever rubbish the big groups submit. It's truly ridiculous.

(74) 讚！ | 科研2狗

Which one did you finally submit to Wiley?

(0) 讚！ | AY

May I ask how long it takes to receive the results after submitting your contribution?

(0) 讚！ | Mokia-Lee

After reading the articles inside, I found them to be mediocre. Thinking of supporting domestic journals, I submitted my most promising work, but it was rejected without review. Then I submitted it to Wiley's material field journal, and it was accepted after minor revisions. I really hope that domestic journals can create a fair academic dissemination environment.

(78) 讚！ | 润成

The tragedy has already been submitted, but it hasn't been reviewed yet. The time for assigning the chief editor has exceeded 7 days, which is confusing. Is it really that slow? I won't comment on it since it hasn't been submitted for review after all. PS: Is worldsheeper an internal staff member of the journal?

(52) 讚！ | 双色球真刺激

The opinion upstairs is biased. NML, as an outstanding representative of domestic journals, has put in a great effort to manage the journal well. During the 2020 pandemic, the journal organized online forums with participation from thousands of international scholars. In addition to an international editorial team and a strict review system, its influence is built on the support of a large number of research teams. NML has been established for many years and has not implemented a charging system in open-access journals, striving to provide a platform for showcasing excellent works to researchers. It is not easy, and I hope NML can continue to improve, and more friends can support the development of NML journal.

(0) 讚！ | worldsheeper

Representatives in domestic journals, with editorial members who have a global perspective and a professional and stable review team. The review process is fast, and currently there are no charges, possessing the advantages of open-access journals. They will continue to receive strong support. Currently, domestic open-access journals have been diligently and earnestly working, and all papers are free. It is not easy, and we look forward to NML Journal providing more opportunities for excellent domestic submissions in the future.

(0) 讚！ | worldsheeper

Notice of results will be given within three weeks, and acceptance will be made within two months. A professional team will conduct an international review. The language will be improved by the editorial department before publication. Images will be published as vector graphics. The magazine is very dedicated and hopes to improve continuously.

(73) 讚！ | refrewf

So far, no page fees have been charged, even though it is open-access publishing.

(0) 讚！ | 985

This journal has been open-access since its establishment until now, but it has never charged any author publication fees.

(0) 讚！ | 985

I have reviewed an article, and I am not very clear about the positioning of this journal. I reviewed it based on Small's positioning and gave the other party a major revision.

(116) 讚！ | Strawberry1126

March 1st - Submitted
Then, continuously awaiting edit office processing
March 5th - Awaiting reviewer assignment
March 6th - Awaiting Reviewer Scores
March 22nd - Reject

There were two reviewers, one with friendly comments, and the other wrote a lengthy 1251-word rejection letter. The reviewer repeatedly emphasized that they couldn't understand what they were reading and claimed that the article lacked logical coherence and had poor English. This is my 8th SCI paper, and I don't believe my English is that poor. Personally, I think the logic is clear. They intentionally rejected it because based on their comments, I could tell that they are part of a prestigious research group in the field (abroad) and my findings contradicted their assumptions. I hope to have smooth submissions to other journals and have listed them as opposed reviewers.

(2) 讚！ | 希望666

2021.1.25 submit to journal (Submitted to the journal on January 25, 2021)
2021.2.9 major revise 共4个审稿人 (Major revision completed on February 9, 2021, with a total of 4 reviewers)
2021.2.17 修回 (Revised on February 17, 2021)
2021.3.22 接收 (Accepted on March 22, 2021)
The overall efficiency of the journal is very high, and the speed is fast!

(0) 讚！ | 秋夕

Just want to ask, how is the review speed of nano-micro letters? Do we need to pay a publication fee?

(0) 讚！ | 霜天