The magazine belongs to the authoritative magazine in the industry, and its impact factor is also increasing year by year. Reviewers are also very responsible. The questions they raise are very helpful in improving the quality of the articles. The editors take great care in typesetting in the later stage, and they also pay attention to various details

(4) 讚！ | Diligence_ok

Top authoritative journals in the industry, and the expected impact factor is expected to continue to rise; 
The editor is very professional. When I submitted my paper, I was a junior colleague. One reviewer asked nearly two hundred questions twice. Perhaps because I was the first to do similar research on waterfowl, the reviewer was very professional, and I learned a lot from it. 
It took four and a half months from submission to acceptance. I was busy with other things and applied for two 2-week extensions. With high efficiency, it could be 3-4 months

(2) 讚！ | guanglianggaocq

Is this review fast?

(0) 讚！ | wmomo

It is indeed related to the magazine. I didn't believe it at first. Our research group submitted N papers and they were all rejected directly. Other research groups have done similar or even inferior work with less data, but because they are from big research groups, their papers are accepted and published! 
Can't it be fair? Clearly the topics match your interests, but you reject them for no reason. Every time it's the same copy and paste decision letter. If the reviewers reject our paper, then we accept it. But this...I don't want to say much more. JDS accepted related articles, what a big difference!

(230) 讚！ | 爆富爆文章

@zyyssdsd speaks loudly

(0) 讚！ | 黄天不负

With a curious mindset, I searched and briefly browsed through this article. To be honest, considering its data volume, innovativeness, and impact on the industry, it is unlikely that the Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine would accept it.

(0) 讚！ | pupupupupu

There's nothing much to criticize. It's still necessary to organize the experimental ideas clearly and have a certain level of innovative ability to publish in this journal, which shouldn't be a problem. Personally, I think it's better than AN. I had previously submitted this article to five or six journals and got rejected, with AN taking the longest, rejecting it after almost half a year. After spending more than three months reorganizing the ideas and conducting additional experiments, my supervisor suggested submitting to Redox Biology. However, it was rejected after review, proving that high-quality articles are indeed difficult to publish. After a few months of reformatting and resubmitting to JASB, it was quickly sent for review. After two months, I received the reviewer's comments, which mainly focused on formatting issues and lack of rigor in the materials and methods description. After making the necessary revisions, it took about three weeks to receive the second-round review comments. After addressing a few minor issues, the article was accepted about three weeks after resubmission.

(0) 讚！ | 科研咸鱼

This magazine judges by appearance!!!! It has to be the face of an academician!!!!

(16) 讚！ | 见龙卸甲

I think you can focus on the journal itself, but there is no need to target someone's paper. What criteria do you use to evaluate the quality of a paper? On what basis do you claim that someone cannot even publish in the Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine? How many papers have you published? Is it considered high quality just because it involves cell studies, model creation, or multiple omics analysis?

(0) 讚！ | zyyssdsd

We submitted two papers, but both were rejected with the reason of not being interested, senior sister.

(0) 讚！ | 白月牙

Pure relationship magazine, let them have fun on their own~~

(45) 讚！ | xiaoyuyuo

Not submitted for review and rejected. Previously I didn't believe it was a personal journal, but now I do. However, if it were the same content from a foreign scholar, I believe the manuscript would have a high probability of being reviewed.

(7) 讚！ | zyyssdsd

May I ask if an email notification will be sent to inform me about the assigned editor after allocation and editing?

(0) 讚！ | Scofield

In the past two years, the magazine has finally moved up to a higher tier, but it has become even harder to submit articles. I don't know why, but it seems that regular research groups just can't get accepted, and they don't even go through the peer review process. I hope the magazine can become more fair and give each of us a chance. If possible, please consider sending it for review, even if it gets rejected, I would be willing to accept it. It's really disappointing to be directly rejected in the initial review. I really want to support the development of domestic journals and hope that domestic journals can give us ordinary researchers a chance.

(21) 讚！ | 哈哈投稿真难

He is a joke... This kind of magazine should be reorganized...

(100) 讚！ | 0.0-992229

Supplementation with sodium butyrate improves growth and antioxidant function in dairy calves before weaning. The quality of JASB articles varies greatly, and some may not even meet the standards for publication in the Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology.

(658) 讚！ | 天上飞

Doing the same thing, some laboratories can publish it, while others cannot even submit it for review. It depends on the preference of the editor-in-chief. Those who are familiar with it know that it applies to the journal of China Agricultural University.

(173) 讚！ | alex_2020