After being employed, when confirming the layout agreement, why can't the corresponding author's email receive the link request email?

(0) 讚！ | butsci

Submission in June 2022
Accepted in September 2023
The review comments during the period were actually not bad. I thought the whole process could be completed quickly, but it has been delayed for so long. It's already November, and there is still no sign of being online. When I emailed to inquire, the other party said they had forwarded the issue to the relevant department.
Negative review! How can an open-access journal be so slow? If I had known, why did I spend so much money? Regular journals are faster than you!
Blacklist all Korean journals!

(0) 讚！ | sissi_letpub

Really disgusting, rejected directly after four months, no important comments. It's truly disgusting, infuriating, infuriating, infuriating. I don't understand why this trash journal is still alive, publishing over 100 articles a year!!! Disgusting.

(2) 讚！ | ssssssaaa

How much is the layout fee for this journal?

(0) 讚！ | Syal111

From submission to receiving the reviewer's comments took 40 days. The minor revisions suggested were reasonable, and I felt the speed of the review process was acceptable. Although it is an open-access journal, the number of articles published annually is not high, so the quality should still be good.

(1) 讚！ | Bruce Chen

Bad journal with bad review process. Wait 4 month for first-round and plus 3 month for the second round. Reviewers almost accept but Editor say no because of English grammar errors which have not been checked by a native Speaker. 3er round with a editor and ...reject with a stupid reason.

(0) 讚！ | Anonym

I had a bad experience with this journal. Waited 4 month for the first round and then 3 months for the second round. Reviewers almost accepted the paper but the editor said no because the English grammar errors had not been checked by a native Speaker. 3rd round with an editor and ...rejected due to a stupid reason.

(0) 讚！ | Anonym

selectd for 3 months without review, and later reviewed 6The month returned two dispensable opinions, and the editor gave the re-submitment after the change.No confidence, so bad journal requirements are so high, decided to change to ASCE

(1) 讚！ | xx.He