It's been 18 days, why is it still "with editor"

(0) 讚！ | kaijie

I am also this editor

(0) 讚！ | 熙熙攘攘xi

Weiguo Song edits very quickly and efficiently

(0) 讚！ | vairwei

2024.3.5 Submit
2024.3.10 Review
2024.3.26 Major revision
2024.4.6 Revise
2024.4.9 Accept

(1) 讚！ | vairwei

2023.10.4 submitted
2023.11.17 in peer review
2023.12.12 minor revision
2023.12.26 revision submitted
2023.1.03 with editor
2024.01.15 with editor
It feels really slow, it takes a month and a half from submission to sending to peer review. Now it's been resubmitted for revision, and I really don't know how long this editor will take to send it for review again. I strongly do not recommend the editor Antonia Praetorius. The peer review is fast, the slow part is the editor. If you need the article urgently, I do not recommend submitting to this journal

(0) 讚！ | kb 毛某人

The article submitted at the beginning of November is still in the hands of the editor and has not been sent for review. What is going on

(0) 讚！ | 简单的

The review speed is very fast, from the first review to acceptance of revisions, it only took about a month and a half. The efficiency is very high, and ESN is well recognized in the industry. I hope the journal will continue to improve!

(18) 讚！ | Leon_Leo

It's relatively fast, and the content is about nano pesticides.
12.06 Submitted.
12.12 Assigned editor.
12.13 Sent for review (instant review).
1.22 During the Chinese New Year period, four weeks were given for revisions. A reviewer was assigned, major revisions were made. The editor may have felt it was not enough, so another reviewer was assigned. No objections were raised.
2.9 Major revisions completed, sent for second review.
2.24 Minor revisions.
2.25 Minor revisions completed.
2.28 Accepted.
From submission to acceptance, it took three months, which is neither fast nor slow. It was relatively lucky, and the editor, Susana Loureiro, was relatively fast in processing.

(6) 讚！ | 育东

Brother, don't joke around. You have only been with the editor for 10 days, while I have been with them for four months and haven't received a reply even after sending two follow-up letters.

(0) 讚！ | Accepted2015

May I ask how long it took for your paper to go from the initial review to the editing stage? It has been 10 days for me... and there has been no progress at all.

(12) 讚！ | chenyizhi

I am also this editor, I am really drunk, indeed European people's work efficiency is low, it seems like articles related to nanotoxicology are always assigned to this editor.

(0) 讚！ | 青鸡

The first review took a total of four months (including more than 3 months in the "with editor" status, as the editor stated that the reviewers did not submit their comments within the deadline and they had to find new reviewers). The manuscript was given major revisions and it has been 9 days since resubmission, and it is still in the review process. Is everyone here working in the field of toxicology? I was assigned to this editor automatically, and their efficiency is indeed low. All we can do is patiently wait and hope for a positive outcome for everyone.

(0) 讚！ | ghhiyy

peer review has changed to with editor for 10 days now, and there has been no progress. It is still the same editor.

(0) 讚！ | Calvina

The review speed is too slow. The assassins in the SCI journal have not reached the hands of the editor since the initial review on July 5th.

(1) 讚！ | 皮蛋瘦肉周周

Is the speed this slow? I just submitted it almost two weeks ago and it's still in the initial review.

(0) 讚！ | 皮蛋瘦肉周周

Rejected after submission.
Initial review status for 15 days.
With editor for 15 days.
Rejected, reason not suitable...
It's considered normal, I guess.

(0) 讚！ | 风生水起静

I am also this editor, it is really too slow...

(0) 讚！ | 向往有你一方

May I ask who your editor is? I submitted mine on May 26, 2022, and it's been with the editor for about a month now, still in progress as of June 28.

(0) 讚！ | 向往有你一方

May I ask who your editor is? I submitted mine on May 26, 2022, and it is still "with editor" as of June 28. The editor is Iseult Lynch from the University of Birmingham, UK. I sincerely do not recommend.

(0) 讚！ | 向往有你一方

Done, I am also this editor.

(0) 讚！ | Accepted2015

Ah, I am also an editor for this, and it's really slow to a surprising extent. It has already been over three months now, with the status "with editor" possibly lasting for as long as two and a half months. Sending reminders doesn't help either. Each time the attitude is quite good, but there is no progress. It has been almost a month since the last change from "in peer review" to "with editor" status, and there has been no news at all. I wonder what the editor is busy with...

(0) 讚！ | ghhiyy

It took more than 5 months, and I would also like to share the submission process:
December 28, 2021: Submitted
February 22, 2022: Rejected & Resubmitted
March 17, 2022: Resubmitted after modification
May 12, 2022: Major revision
May 28, 2022: Returned after modification
June 4, 2022: Accepted
It feels quite difficult to get accepted, thanks to the editor and reviewers~ I hope the journal continues to improve!

(1) 讚！ | IWantMoreAcceptedPapers

2021.12.2 Submission
2022.2.6 Major overhaul
2022.2.22 Return
2022.3.16 Minor overhaul
2022.3.17 Acceptance
The process took over three months, with most of the time spent on external review. However, the editing process was quite fast.

(0) 讚！ | eeeye

11.11 Submission
11.22 Editing and allocation
11.24 Submission for review
12.12 First round of review feedback received, given three weeks for major revisions
1.4 Major revisions completed, submission for second round of review
1.24 Acceptance
It took two months from submission to acceptance, which is quite fast.

(1) 讚！ | sxliy

The journal has a high quality control, with a small number of articles accepted each year, which is still very good.

(2) 讚！ | GG疯狂豆沙包