Are the revisions recommended in this journal made by the academic editor's comments to the authors? I only found one issue in my paper marked as major revisions, but I couldn't find any other comments for changes in other parts

(0) 讚！ | SSSaaaaa

I submitted it on March 23rd, received a notification for minor revisions on April 6th, made the revisions on April 11th, and received acceptance on April 12th.

(0) 讚！ | panpan1234

Two months from submission to acceptance 123.

(0) 讚！ | Mark_David

You can contact me by email, thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 魏王

May I ask how much is the fee for this layout?

(0) 讚！ | cyyyyyyyy

Recently, I have been responsible for a special issue of the Catalysts (IF: 4.501) journal, focusing on the design and synthesis of heterogeneous catalysts with no specific application limitations. I am in charge of applying for a discount on publication fees for everyone. Submissions are welcome at https://www.mdpi.com/journal/catalysts/special_issues/82QZ6C6RX3. Contact email: weizhzhe@zjut.edu.cn.

(3) 讚！ | 魏王

Do we need to pay taxes in addition to the layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | ctbud

Submission experience:
2021.12.27 submitted
2021.12.27 under review
2022.01.23 major revision Three reviewers: 3 major revisions. There were many problems raised by the reviewers during the major revision, and they were very professional.
2022.01.31 resubmitted
2022.02.09 major revision After the major revision, two reviewers were not satisfied with the modifications.
2021.02.15 resubmitted
2021.02.15 under review
2021.02.16 accept
Overall, the review process was fast and the reviewers were very professional. We hope that the impact factor will continue to increase and the paper will be included in the second tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences soon.

(5) 讚！ | dye124

2022.1.13 submission
2022.1.24 major revision (10 days) Two reviewers, one major revision, one minor revision
2022.2.1 resubmit the revision
2022.2.4 minor revision (2 days) Dissatisfaction with the response to the major revision from one reviewer
2022.2.6 accept
The whole process from submission to acceptance took a total of 25 days. Both the editor and the reviewers were very professional with their questions. It is recommended to conduct solid experiments before submitting, and ensure that the overall logical structure of the paper is clear. Otherwise, it may be rejected and it is advised to resubmit after making the necessary modifications. Additionally, the issues raised during the major revision were all very professional. The given 7-10 days were not sufficient if the relevant data and characterization were not prepared beforehand. This is just my personal opinion, and should be taken as a reference.

(4) 讚！ | Holly

2021.11.5 submitted
2021.11.5 under review
2021.11.13 major revision Four reviewers: 1 acceptance, 2 minor revisions, 1 major revision. The reviewer for the major revision had many professional questions.
2021.11.19 resubmitted
2021.11.19 major revision The reviewer for the major revision was not satisfied with the modifications.
2021.11.26 resubmitted
2021.11.27 accept
Overall, the review process was fast, and the reviewers were very professional. We hope that the impact factor continues to rise and that we can be included in the second zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences soon.

(1) 讚！ | 小浩

The manuscript review is very professional and responsible. If you're in a hurry, you can submit it, as the process is fast.

(1) 讚！ | Amyjiong

Although it is an open-source journal, it is a special issue, and the recommended reviewers are all experts in the field of catalysis. The opinions provided are relatively professional and not as perfunctory as imagined.

(0) 讚！ | 催化新手

The speed is super fast. It takes less than two weeks from submission to acceptance. The article is innovative, but the process of concrete verification actually has flaws, and I don't want to conduct experiments to make up for it. In the end, it was changed to a weak mechanism biased towards application, mainly focusing on format, images, and attention to detail. The fee is indeed high.
Those in a rush to graduate can submit, and those who want to have a paper to rely on can also do so. If a master's thesis is submitted, there may even be a chance to receive a scholarship. Regardless of the quality of the journal, having a paper in hand reduces anxiety, and one can then focus on the rest.

(3) 讚！ | 九天揽月

The acceptance time of articles is short, and the acceptance rate is 70% announced in the official website. It is really suitable for people who are in a hurry to graduate to submit. There were two reviewers, who both agreed to accept it after major revision for the first review, with a 7-day time for revision; it then was accepted directly after revision. The assistant editor is super good, he followed up every process in real time. Awesome! Credit card is recommended for payment. I used a bank wire transfer. I personally find it more troublesome. I have not returned to school, and I live in a county. The staff in the bank was not that familiar with the overseas remittance business and I even worried that the transfer may not be successful. During that time, I was very anxious, and browsed the submission experience everywhere, and now I would like to give you some feedback.

(5) 讚！ | 顺利

Advantages: fast review speed and high editing efficiency. It took 2 weeks from submission to acceptance. There were four reviewers in total, all of them were relatively professional, two of them accepted the manuscript directly, and two of them gave me three days for minor revision. I submitted the revised manuscript the next day, and it was accepted within 2 hours. Disadvantages: It was an open journal and charged a high publication fee.

(5) 讚！ | Marilyn

Received: 1 February 2019; Revised: 18 February 2019; Accepted: 18 February 2019; Published: 26 February 2019. Three reviewers; professional and fast! Those who are anxious to graduate are recommended to submit.

(1) 讚！ | 北极狼

Received Date 6 August 2018Revised Date 25 August 2018Accepted Date 3 September 2018Published Date 7 September 2018Overall, although this journal is an open journal, it is still relatively professional.

(2) 讚！ | Charles Hao

My paper is a draft.August 29, contributionSeptember 13th, review comments returned (overhaul)September 18, submitted revised draftNoon on the afternoon of September 22nd, comments minor repairOn the evening of September 23, submit the revised draft again.September 24th, waiting for the editor's opinion

(9) 讚！ | 王二小勇斗SCI

June 11, submission; June 22nd, review comments returned (major revision); June 30, revised paper submitted; morning of July 1, comments of minor revision received; evening of July 1st, revised paper submitted again; and July 2, accepted. The review is fast, and the reviewers and editors are very professional and responsible. But the editing service fee is quite expensive.

(1) 讚！ | daisy

The review speed is super fast.The three review comments are relatively friendly, one of them knows what we are doing, and the comments are helpful to improve the quality of the article.The layout fee is expensive, and there will be a reminder of the layout fee when submitting the manuscript.

(1) 讚！ | Hello

Reviewing speed is fast, two weeks for review resultsOne of the four reviewers, I understand a lot of meaningful questions.Received two weeks after modificationOpen journals

(7) 讚！ | 立天下