All questions must be answered in detail, without skipping any

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

It is not necessary to supplement, but there should be convincing reasons for the judges and editors

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Should we also respond to reviewers' positive comments?

(0) 讚！ | 深渊兴业

Reviewers and journal editors asked me to add experiments. Do I have to add them, or is it non-negotiable?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

2020-6-12 submitted; 2020-7-2 comments for the first review received; 2020-7-14, revised submission, with no experiment supplemented; 2020-7-31 comments for the second review received; 2020-8-5, revised submission; 2020-8-26 accepted.

(1) 讚！ | be accepted

Is the editor who communicates with you each time friendly? Do you think it's one editor or several editors that you're communicating with? Have you found everyone to be friendly? It's been almost two weeks since the major revisions were sent back, so I wanted to ask if it's appropriate to send a reminder for the manuscript

(0) 讚！ | 中原曜坤

Review speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: Just a note, submitted on 2020-6-12

(0) 讚！ | 四风玉泽

The first review took almost two months, and I almost collapsed after waiting. I thought it was failed. However, the result was a major revision. The review comments were quite objective, requiring supplementing the experiment. I have made up all the experiments that can be made up, and explained why others cannot be made up due to limited conditions. At the same time, I cited the literatures for supplementary explanation. It was accepted one month after the second review! The whole process is not as fast as in the legend, so be careful if you are in a hurry!

(0) 讚！ | 欧尼Su

The first review took almost two months, making me almost lose patience, thinking that it was over. But the result was a major revision, and the review comments were still relatively fair and objective. Supplementary experiments were required, and I completed all the experiments that could be conducted. For experiments that could not be conducted due to constraints, I provided explanations, as well as additional references. The second review was accepted one month after submission. The entire process was not as quick as rumored, so it is still advisable to be cautious when pressed for time

(0) 讚！ | 四象惜玉

It's been almost two months since I submitted my manuscript, but I haven't heard anything yet. Can anyone tell me what's going on?

(0) 讚！ | Hyman Jefferson

Why are there issues from 2015 and 2016 in a magazine that has only been established for 2-3 months?

(0) 讚！ | 锦锦公子

Hello, may I ask if it takes less than two months from submission to publication for you? I searched on PubMed and found that recent journal articles are taking 3-6 months to publish

(0) 讚！ | Sharon Lizzie

I submitted my paper through the biorxiv system, but I haven't received any updates. What should I do?

(0) 讚！ | 上清易容

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 75.0
Experience Sharing: Just a simple sharing of experiences
1. The journal is very fast, from submission to online in less than two months.
2. The editors are also very friendly. Every time I have a question, the editor can patiently and quickly reply within half a day. I am very touched by this, which is completely different from other editors who seem indifferent!
3. Two reviewers, professional and friendly, provided very good suggestions.
4. Submission timeline: Submitted on 27th February 2019, received minor revisions on 2nd April 2019, had about half a month to make revisions without needing to conduct additional experiments, resubmitted on 10th April 2019, article was accepted on 23rd April 2019, and online on 28th April 2019

(0) 讚！ | 书生依凝

I submitted a manuscript through the bioRXiv system, but there’s no reply. What’s going on?

(0) 讚！ | 沈

The starting impact factor is 2 points or more, medical articles account for a large proportion, and language correction is also accepted after acceptance, very careful.The number of articles in the year is about 200.The final impact factor is estimated to be stable at 3-4 points.

(1) 讚！ | qqwang1998@126.com

New journal, the impact factor is kept above 2 points, and there is a possibility of 3 points next year.

(3) 讚！ | wangqi@sina.com

Overall, the review speed is OK, usually within one month. Although the journal requests reviewers to focus on the reliability of the technology and conclusions, the published papers generally have some novelty. If the journal keeps receiving about 200 submissions each year, the impact factor is likely to go up.

(2) 讚！ | liuyan@163.com

Yeah, how long has it been since you replied? What's the result?

(0) 讚！ | 天际映冬

Have you encountered any issues with ORCID not being found when submitting your work? It always seems unresponsive. How can this be resolved?

(0) 讚！ | 星熊德兰

I sent out my package on the 8th, but still haven't heard anything as of the 28th... Wasn't it supposed to arrive within three weeks?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄水秋

Have you encountered any problems with ORCID not being found when submitting manuscripts, always without any response?

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞春荣

The first trial was about three weeks soon, but the second trial also took about three weeks for the first trial. It was enough for two months.The quicker one is that the second trial is slow.The sensory impact factor is low.I don't know if it will go high in recent years. I hope that

(2) 讚！ | greenblood

A good magazine with fast reviewing speed and constructive feedback

(0) 讚！ | 又莲小哥哥