The editor-in-chief of this journal has reviewed three articles, and the reviewers' opinions suggest that even minor revisions can result in rejection and resubmission. The journal has high standards for image formats, only accepting black and white images. The number of reviewers and review rounds depends entirely on the editor's ability to invite willing reviewers. If lucky, three reviewers and the editor's personal feedback can result in completion within 2-3 rounds. However, if unlucky, revisions may experience up to 5 rounds, involving 8 reviewers and lasting over half a year. In successful cases, completion can be achieved in 2 months. This journal prefers articles on metallurgy or the metallurgy-selective combination, with few options for pure ore dressing studies

(0) 讚！ | Dr.丁

Really? Is this for real? It's so disappointing.

(0) 讚！ | 我不是研究生

This journal is really unreliable. You can check relevant articles. The articles written by the editor-in-chief or the deputy editor-in-chief have the highest acceptance rate. The reasons for rejection are often offensive. I really don't understand where the impact factor comes from.

(1) 讚！ | 学术菜鸟23

Great journal, reviews very rapidly.

(0) 讚！ | skkawatr@yahoo.com

The speed of processing manuscripts of this journal was very fast. The result was basically given in a day after submission. It was rejected in the external review. It took about one month for the review. There were 4 articles submitted by research group, and two of them were accepted. There should be requirements for the research direction of the articles.

(0) 讚！ | MINE