To be honest, it feels like this journal is going downhill. The most obvious sign is the decrease in impact factor. After waiting for several months, the editor completely ignored it, just dragging it along without rejecting or reviewing it. It's disgusting that when you inquire through email, they either ask you to withdraw the submission yourself or just wait. It seems like nobody is managing this journal anymore. I sincerely advise against submitting to this journal. You can try other journals, they all seem better than this one.

(17) 讚！ | wjf1569792000@163.com

Excuse me, those who have submitted the articles and said it was extremely slow: Who was your editor at that time?

(0) 讚！ | luckydog1994

Think carefully to submit!!!!!! Last year, I submitted an article on conversion material, 02/13/2019-Submitted to Journal, 02/10/2020-With Editor, during which I sent emails to urge it for many times.

(3) 讚！ | yangyu

It was with editor for seven months, and it took a month to be sent for review. It was finally accepted after a minor revision. The review speed should be faster.

(1) 讚！ | 853007793@qq.com

Submitted in January, the editor of August began to process the results in September, minor repairs, just repaired, but did not submit the response according to the reviewer's word problem, is it cold?....

(1) 讚！ | fff1abc

Submission 2017-10-16; still With Editor 20180-04-04. The Journal is too slow. We have inquired about the status twice but got the same reply both times: "We are in process of changing te editorial board. If you are in a hurry then you can withdraw your manuscript." I don't know why such a journal can still survive and why people submit papers to such journals

(4) 讚！ | 1507956596@qq.com

The review speed is really fast. I selectd in June last year, and now I have reviewed it.

(8) 讚！ | licl

This journal is very disgusting. From September last year to now, I waited for one and a half months to start UNDER REVIEW. After more than two months, I came back for the first instance and returned it for half a month.As a result, in January and a half months, there was no movement at all...I asked the editor for 5 months, the editor returned directly, or I retracted or waited...Heart tired ah

(2) 讚！ | cxr

This journal is very disgusting, from September last year to now, waiting for a month and a half to start UNDERREVIEW, after more than two months, the first-instance opinion came back, and it was repaired for half a month. The result was January and a half months, and there was no movement at all...I asked the editor for 5 months, and the editor returned directly, either retracting or waiting...Heart tired ah

(0) 讚！ | cxr

8.1 No.1, 9.31 mail is ready to be retracted, 10.7 is sent for review, one month's review comments are returned, one directly accepts, three minor repairs, one overhaul, 2 weeks change, changeAfter about 20 days, I accepted the

(0) 讚！ | gg

The opinion of the first-instance review has been repaired for half a month, and there is no reaction at all. What is the situation?Do you want to remind

(0) 讚！ | gg

has been submitted for a month and a half, have not been submitted for review, it is too disgusting

(0) 讚！ | gg

I have already selectd for 11 days, and the status is still with editor. How long does this journal send for review?

(0) 讚！ | gg

editing efficiencyLow, the reviewer's opinion is not very professional, suggest that the article urgently published people do not select this journal

(0) 讚！ | 好hh

Two months before and after three reviewers overhaul The comments given by the reviewers are very professional. Many grammatical errors are pointed out one by one.Received after one week of repair.Upstairs said that his article was rejected because the response file was not separated in the order of reviewers, but was placed in a document.This journal is clearly proposed (and mandatory) when sending back the review comments. For each reviewer's response, it needs to be placed in a separate word.If you don't follow the advice, you will be rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 123

If you don't want to find yourself, don't select for this disgusting journal. It's the most wonderful journal, no one, evenThe editor-in-chief can be two.First of all, the journal has a long time for submission. It seems that the editor only processes the manuscript on the weekend, so it is not known that it will be your turn to be a few weeks. Secondly, the journal has 5-6 reviewers, and my article has encountered5 reviewers (five people agreed to modify, in fact, it is already very difficult); in addition, the journal is strictly metamorphosis, our article was rejected because the response files are not separated in the order of reviewers,It is placed in a document (we respond to each reviewer's response we have already started another page), in this case the editor directly rejected the manuscript (reports of the five reviewers we wrote nearly 30 pages of word documents))!Therefore, the editor-in-chief does not respect the results of your labor. He only values ​​the so-called format. The journal hosted by this sb editor advises everyone not to select. It is really not easy for you!

(4) 讚！ | superxwolf

How long does it take to get an external trial upstairs?It seems very slow and slow??Submitted on September 14th, there is no movement at all!

(0) 讚！ | chemdraw

Carefully rewritten according to the reviewer's request, generally no problem.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous