Please bring good luck and let the child's paper be accepted smoothly, I beg you

(0) 讚！ | lgy11

Please bring good luck and give the child a chance to make amends, please

(0) 讚！ | lgy11

It shows under review, but I don't know if it's in the hands of the editor or if it has already been submitted for review

(0) 讚！ | momo

Has the status changed on your end? Mine has been "under review" since submission, it's been 3 weeks

(0) 讚！ | momo

It has been two weeks since I submitted my application, and the status has been under review. Does anyone know if this means it is being reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | beiwu

How long does it usually take for Light to decide whether to proceed with an external audit?

(0) 讚！ | beiwu

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and "

(0) 讚！ | TTSSSSS

The first review will be returned in about 40 days, and the experiment will be reviewed and resubmitted for about a month. The second review will be returned in about 50 days

(1) 讚！ | TTSSSSS

May I ask how long in advance you notify the review message? Is it around one week?

(0) 讚！ | scu流川枫

Submitted on November 1st, currently in the hands of the editor, will be reviewed soon.

(5) 讚！ | scu流川枫

投 means "to submit" or "to contribute", 结果 means "result", and 未知 means "unknown". Therefore, the translation of the given text "已投，结果未知" into English is "Submitted, result unknown."

(0) 讚！ | scu流川枫

Just submitted the manuscript and received the email indicating the start of the evaluation process, a prayer post, hoping it can be reviewed and accepted smoothly.

(0) 讚！ | YQAmber

Has Light sent the review email? After submission, it shows "under review". I can't tell if it has been sent for review. Thank you~

(0) 讚！ | YQAmber

Received: 23 February 2022
Revised: 03 May 2022
Accepted: 21 May 2022

At the final stage, one of the reviewers at NC rejected it for a ridiculous reason, and the appeal was unsuccessful. However, the subsequent submission went more smoothly.

(0) 讚！ | optics

Submitted for review, waiting for the outcome, first fulfill a wish.

(1) 讚！ | MWH

May I ask what is the change in the review status?

(0) 讚！ | WeiBai0822

If I can submit it for review, I will come back to fulfill my vow.

(67) 讚！ | MWH

The journal has a good reputation abroad, with a high impact factor, and the reviewers are very knowledgeable and strict. However, the speed is too slow, and each step takes a long time. Researchers who urgently need to publish articles and graduate should choose carefully...

(24) 讚！ | WGG

The editing process is very strict, and it is not easy to submit for review. The reviewers are extremely professional, with three of them being foreigners. They replied with over 10 pages of feedback, and after two rounds of revisions, including additional experiments and simulations, it took four months to get accepted. Wishing the journal continued success.

(2) 讚！ | 走过路过的我

Excuse me, boss, is there a page fee required? Would it be convenient to send a template?

(1) 讚！ | 小李CNS

Very quickly, I would like to express my gratitude to Chang Guangsuo and Light Editing Society for giving me an opportunity. The article I submitted is about the development of a broadband absorber for long and very long waves.

(8) 讚！ | Mr.Z星晨隐

Four months after the first submission, the result was returned. Two reviewers were very positive, one reviewer rejected it directly without giving any practical reasons, saying that our article is not worthy of Light. I was speechless! I appealed. The result was returned in two weeks, it was rejected directly. There were 2 reviewers, one accepted directly, and the second one said that the article lacked page numbers, and it was unprofessional. The introduction part was too much. Some parts of the content were lacking in references. It is not worthy of a journal with an impact factor of 14. The article was directly rejected. The reviewer avoided the heavy and took the light, and didn't mention the major achievements of innovation in the article. This is the standard of domestic journals. It took more than half a year.

(110) 讚！ | haha123

Second manuscript. Required a round of major revisions and then just minor revisions for the second round of review (on average each round was ~40 days to get the comments from the reviewers).This time the two reviewers combined had over 20 comments (difficulty 5/5). The revisions were brutal with simulations, more experimental data, and adding additional imaging modalities for confirmation. Our paper was rejected by Nat. Methods and Nat. Photonics before we submitted here.

(0) 讚！ | crazyOpticsKid2

Light is a great journal with a very strict requirement for novelty and impact. Manuscript required two rounds of major revisions (~3 weeks hear back from reviewers each time) which entailed adding an abundant amount of supplemental information (using data we already had) and rewriting several parts of the manuscript (difficulty 4/5).Was rejected by NatComm before submitting.

(0) 讚！ | crazyOpticsKid

Light

(0) 讚！ | crazyOpticsKid