May I ask how many reviewers are there?

(0) 讚！ | 重走青春

The submission was made on December 12, and received major revisions on January 2nd. The revised manuscript was resubmitted on January 25th and accepted on January 29th, the first day of the Chinese New Year. The second review process was really fast. Unfortunately, it was downgraded to the third district. Professor Yu Chengzhong, as the editor-in-chief, handled it very quickly.

(0) 讚！ | 油焖小龙虾

Hello, may I ask how to choose whether to use OA?

(0) 讚！ | SCI好难中

It's been over a week with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | ArRn Ge

It's a great magazine. Submitted in July, revised in August, made changes for 3 days and submitted again. Accepted in September, the whole process took 2 months, and it's non-OA. The speed is quite fast. Hope the impact factor won't drop, UP UP!

(0) 讚！ | 豆子

7.22 accepted
7.26 licensed

(1) 讚！ | laogai

Hello, did you use a template when submitting your manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | Xiaohe He

The efficiency feels low.
Submitted on 1.26.
Editor requested full-length non-trimmed Western Blot on 1.28.
Provided original data on 2.15, assistant editor acknowledged receipt, but no further communication, still with editor.
Emailed by end of March to inquire about status, editor replied requesting non-trimmed WB or deletion of that data.
WB data deleted and submitted for review on 4.16.
Major revision on 5.28, with 24 comments from three reviewers.
Revised on 6.9.
Editor replied on 6.24 accepting minor revisions, with just one issue.
Revised on the same day and still with editor one day later.
Still with editor to this day.
The editor's requirements seem very strict, especially for WB, must be full-length non-trimmed, and the efficiency is very low and dragging.
Publishing editor Francesca Jacklin.

(0) 讚！ | laogai

Friend, how long after receiving do you usually proofread?

(0) 讚！ | Gulugulu water

2.6 checking submission and flies
2.7 initial assessment
2.8 with editor
Because of the slow submission during the Lunar New Year
2.18 in peer review
3.22 major revision by two reviewers
4.4 checking submission and files
4.5 with editor
4.7 in peer review
4.10 accept

(0) 讚！ | Gulugulu water

12.6 checking submission and flies
12.6 initial assessment
12.11 with editor
12.16 in peer review
The first review is slow, probably due to the Christmas and New Year period, and the status has been switching between with editor and in peer review.
2.7 major resivion with two reviewers, one of whom is more picky with questions and the other is friendlier, mainly dealing with some detailed formatting issues, taking a long time to conduct experiments.
3.6 checking submission and flies
3.6 with editor
3.7 in peer review
3.20 accept

(0) 讚！ | 难得糊涂1324

Where can I see the review progress?

(0) 讚！ | 古萌萌

Mine didn't mention a specific time, when did yours return to Jimei?

(0) 讚！ | hhhh努力向上

How long did it take for you to return for additional repairs after the major overhaul?

(0) 讚！ | hhhh努力向上

JMCB is not doing well, but maintaining an impact factor of 7 is already good. It's the Chinese Academy of Sciences' zone classification that is a mess, creating a super transcendence factor that no one can understand

(0) 讚！ | AChE-Abeta

It's been over 2 weeks, why is it so slow? Where can I see the new progress?

(0) 讚！ | 李嘉敏

I just received a paper that I submitted in early November, it took two months, but I found out it has been upgraded to a third-tier journal. What a joke, the Chinese Academy of Sciences journal ranking

(0) 讚！ | 四川路行军总管

JMCA suggests to transfer
10.15 checking submission and files
10.15 Initial assessment
10.21 with editor, in peer review
11.14 major revision
11.16 checking submission and flies
11.16 with editor
11.16 in peer review
1.2 major revision (Second review, two reviewers, one accepted, one rejected due to misunderstanding of corresponding concentration. Another reviewer was found and suggested acceptance)
1.3 checking submission and files
1.4 with editor
1.4 in peer review
1.10 with editor
1.10 in peer review
1.16 accept and sign license
Thanks to Clara Humann's editing, the processing efficiency is very high, but the reviewers are slow. The journal was even downgraded to Tier 3, hoping for improvement in the future

(8) 讚！ | easymint

Do you need to use the submission template of this journal when submitting your manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 李嘉敏

From being in the top 2% of engineering technology in 2022 to being in the top 3% of medicine in 2023, it is estimated that this is to create a new battleground for doctors to publish articles and evaluate professional titles

(0) 讚！ | guoguo0901

Submitted 15 Jul 2023
Accepted 03 Dec 2023
First published 06 Dec 2023
I proofread it two days after receiving it

(0) 讚！ | guoguo0901

How long after being hired can I see the publication? It's been over a month and still no news

(0) 讚！ | 高产的神

In 2023, it directly became three districts, changing from the top of District 2 in 2022 to District 3. Ah, why are we so unreliable? How can we still invest in the future?

(18) 讚！ | 随风的人

The first trial is slow, but the second trial is fast

(0) 讚！ | guoguo0901

No news yet in peer review

(0) 讚！ | sunnybitc