There is no comparison, jmca has long been out of touch

(0) 讚！ | mimi111

Have the eyes of other non-blind reviewers been covered? Have the eyes of non-blind peer reviewers been covered? JEC reviews over 4000 submissions a year. Where are all these so-called large groups coming from? The reason some papers are not sent for review is simply because they are of poor quality

(0) 讚！ | 123456789112

Did you blind the editor's eyes when submitting your manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 2023wdx

JEC double-blind review, reviewers and authors do not know each other, which ensures the quality of the manuscripts and eliminates any bias. Editors decide whether to send a manuscript for review solely based on the quality of the paper, using reviewers' comments as the criteria without considering the authors' identities. Speaking of JEC, the journal has seen rapid development in recent years and aims to reach an impact factor of 20. The results can be seen in as short as three years or as long as five years. JEC is striving to align its influence with ACS Energy Letters and Advanced Energy Materials. Submissions are welcome

(0) 讚！ | 123456789112

2024.03.25 submit
2024.03.26 under review
2024.04.02 rrc
2024.04.04 rrc
2024.04.09 rrc
2024.04.10 major 
2024.05.18 revision submitted to journal
2024.05.19 sent back to author 
2024.05.19 under review
2024.05.23 accept

Thank you to the editor and reviewers for their prompt and responsible review process. Although the revision was painful, the outcome was positive. Wishing the journal continued success!

(0) 讚！ | Hoop

Five reviewers, after revisions, have been accepted

(0) 讚！ | 云白！

Hello classmate, I also feel the same way, have you moved on to the next step?

(0) 讚！ | 心心胡吃瓜

After taking a look, everyone seems to have a relatively fast turnaround time for their submissions. The official website even mentions that the first processing results (whether it will be sent for review) will be available in two days. However, my submission has been "with editor" for 4 days already, and it seems like it's not moving very quickly either (laughing and crying emoji

(0) 讚！ | 伊芙利特之祭

At home, everyone pays attention to schools and teachers. It is very difficult for regular groups. At least in foreign countries, they don't understand domestic schools, such as the 211 Project and double non-degree universities, are seen as the same in the eyes of others

(0) 讚！ | 2023wdx

The current jmca is in the 2nd zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. At least in China, it is not inferior to this. If we don't consider the zoning, I personally feel that the level is about the same. jmca covers a wider range of fields

(0) 讚！ | 花火夜空

Went to the wrong floor, let's reset. This journal is pretty good, I'll submit the next one to this

(0) 讚！ | 花火夜空

Which one has higher quality and influence, this journal or JMCA?

(0) 讚！ | 2023wdx

Submission at the end of January
Major revisions in February
Accepted at the end of March
Online in early April
The journal processing speed was very fast, very grateful for the help of the editors and reviewers, wishing JEC continued success, always being among the top in the field

(0) 讚！ | 打工森

2024.04.11 Paper Revision

(0) 讚！ | 云白！

4.10 Required reviewers completed

(0) 讚！ | 云白！

The submission has been rejected, citing lack of originality

(0) 讚！ | dfrefrfg

2024.04.07 required reviews completed

(0) 讚！ | 云白！

This is too fast, how many reviewers have been assigned?

(0) 讚！ | dfrefrfg

2024.04.01 Submitted
2024.04.02 With Editor
2024.04.02 Reviewers invited
2024.04.03 Under Review
2024.04.05 Required Reviews Completed

(0) 讚！ | 云白！

Hi everyone, I would like to ask if the current issue of this journal is accepting submissions related to lithium battery testing and control. I do not have a background in materials or chemistry, as I specialize in control, specifically in lithium battery modeling and predictive algorithms

(0) 讚！ | dfrefrfg

2023.9.9 submitted
2023.9.10 under review
2023.9.26 major revision (7 reviewers, 3 reviewers considered lack of innovation and rejected)
2023.10.29 submitted revision
2023.11.4 accepted. Three reviewers agreed to accept, editor did not wait and accepted directly.
Thanks to Editor Qiang Zhang for the opportunity to revise and for handling the manuscript at lightning speed! Reviewers' questions were very professional, and the quality of the paper greatly improved after revisions. The process of revision was painful, but very rewarding. Wishing the domestic journals better and better!

(0) 讚！ | Matters

A very happy submission experience, Editor Qiang Zhang's handling of the manuscript is truly fast. Sincerely wish the journal will continue to develop better and believe that journals willing to conduct double-blind reviews have the potential and opportunity to develop better

(2) 讚！ | 小小小明

0205 reject

(0) 讚！ | 已注销

How do you get the copyright stamp on this Chinese version? Can I use the college stamp?

(0) 讚！ | 咫尺天涯110

Day 1 submitted
Day 2 with editor/under review
Day 16 major revision Over 20 comments from three reviewers, questions are very professional, conducted many detailed experiments, very helpful in improving the quality of the manuscript. Requested a one-month extension
Day 47 submitted revision
Day 61 major revision About 10 comments from three reviewers
Day 75 submitted revision
Day 89 major revision Two reviewers agreed, one reviewer provided two suggestions
Day 90 submitted revision
Day 96 accepted
Very impressed with the Journal of Energy Chemistry, the editors handle the manuscripts quickly, the reviewers are very professional, the review process is generally fast, and there is news within two weeks for each round of review. Most importantly, the journal adopts a double-blind review system (for the first time) and has high requirements for the quality of the manuscript. The formatting editor also suggests modifications and formatting suggestions for the article. A dedicated journal, worth praising! Will submit again next time!

(7) 讚！ | spliuyou