I submitted in August 23 years ago, now it has come back for minor revisions, and I have been invited from editor to with editor. I don't know if the editor has changed

(0) 讚！ | wuu

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" as the title

(0) 讚！ | xzh

After the minor edit, it changed back to "with editor" from "editor invited". I hope they won't change to a new editor again

(0) 讚！ | wuu

May I ask about the progress? It has been 17 days since my first-instance DIP. Do I need to give up?

(0) 讚！ | xiao

Last July, I submitted my work for review, but the first round of review has not been completed yet. The progress has been stuck since mid-October. I have reminded them several times, but the editor completely ignores it and does not inquire about it.

(0) 讚！ | paperplusplus

Hello. I want to ask if the magazine template of this journal is as simple as the one provided on the official website? Is there a specific website?

(0) 讚！ | Yan_jialele

Classmate, I want to ask if the initial draft template of this magazine journal is really that simple? It felt so easy to download from the official website.

(0) 讚！ | Yan_jialele

It seems that I encountered a very impatient reviewer who returned their feedback without even finishing reading the preliminary version. Furthermore, the editor rejected my submission based on this unfinished feedback from the reviewer.

I am curious as to why it took three months to find only one reviewer. There are many experts who publish in this journal, so why did they only choose a reviewer who couldn't even finish reading the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 衡芜君

To choose an editor, I chose a Chinese person.

(0) 讚！ | geordie

Hello, may I ask if I still need to choose an editor when submitting to this journal? Which editor would be better? The content is related to deep learning prediction.

(0) 讚！ | malemale

The speed is acceptable, but the level of review is uneven. Due to the limited number of experts in the relevant field, there was only one reviewer who provided comments on the text and suggested minor revisions. After submitting the revised version, it took more than 2 months to receive a response, presumably because they were looking for another reviewer. After sending a reminder email, the article was accepted for publication after 1 week, which was considered lucky.

Received at Editorial Office 8 Jun 2022
Article revised 18 Aug 2022
Article accepted for publication 4 Nov 2022

(0) 讚！ | geordie

6.28: submit
10.10: accept

(0) 讚！ | Enperorzyp

The speed is relatively fast, with minor revisions after major revisions, finally taking about 3 months. The journal's quality is also quite good, and the reviewers' comments are relatively fair. I don't know if it can retain its position in the second district of the Chinese Academy of Sciences this time, although the categorization of CAS journals is a bit of a black box. In the end, I still hope the journal will continue to improve.

(0) 讚！ | Enperorzyp

Reply to the previous comment, confirming agreement does not need to be confirmed by every author. Then, "with editor" should be changed to "editor invited". The process should be inviting the associate editor after the main editor has reviewed it.

(2) 讚！ | 一之濑夜

May I ask what happened after the minor revision? Within two weeks, "with editor" changed to "editor invited." What is the situation?

(0) 讚！ | geordie

I remember that we don't need to confirm all.

(0) 讚！ | 一之濑夜

Hello, may I ask if the "confirm your agreement by clicking on this link" link needs to be confirmed by every author after submission? The journal has sent this email three times.

(0) 讚！ | 杜杜早日毕业

Reply to the above, this journal feels average in difficulty. You can also tell from the manuscripts in this journal that it is of a standard intermediate level. However, for individual contributors, the difficulty may also vary depending on the differences between reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 一之濑夜

Hello, may I ask how difficult this journal is?

(0) 讚！ | 放羊的猩猩1

10.26 Submitted
10.3 with Editor
11.23 under review
12.02 under review
12.24 Required Reviews Completed
2.07 major revision
2.23 Revised Manuscript Submitted
3.7 under review
4.4 Review Complete
4.11 Review Complete
4.24 minor revision
5.2 Revised Manuscript Submitted
5.4 Editor invited
5.19 accepted
The first round of review took about 3 and a half months, with a total of three reviewers. From personal experience, the reviewers were relatively prompt, but the editorial handling was slow, and finding reviewers for the first round added to the overall slowness. Perhaps some people encountered editors who were efficient, so the speed was relatively good. This journal's impact factor may decrease this year, and it's uncertain if it can remain in the second quartile. Hopefully, it will continue to improve.

(2) 讚！ | 一之濑夜

Hello, the submission was made in January 2021, and it has been 5 months until June 2021. It is still with the editor. I have inquired twice but have not received any response. Does anyone know what's going on?

(0) 讚！ | lindaguan

Submitted, 25 Mar 2019; Minor revised, 13 Jun 2019; Article revised, 12 Jul 2019; Article accepted for publication, 25 Jul 2019. It took exactly 4 months from submission to acceptance. It took about 2 months for the first review, two reviewers agreed to accept it in about a week after revision. The editor and reviewers’ processing speed was quite fast.

(32) 讚！ | Ryanlys