May I ask how many pages are allowed for the initial submission to this journal?

(0) 讚！ | KH666

2023.2.6 Paper submission
2024.4.6 First round of external review and revision
2024.6.10 Second round of external review and minor revisions
2024.10.6 Third round of external review and minor revisions
2024.10.28 Accepted after revisions

(0) 讚！ | Albert.Tsien

14th October 2024 Accept

(0) 讚！ | JoTy

2024.6.20 Submit
2024.8.21 Revise and Resubmit
2024.9.10 Submit

(0) 讚！ | olivermiaoerrrrrrrr

18-Apr-2024 Submitted
02-Jun-2024 Revise and Resubmit
30-Jul-2024 Resubmitted
02-Sep-2024 Revise and Resubmit 
10-Sep-2024 Submitted
7-Oct-2024 Awaiting AE Recommendation

(0) 讚！ | JoTy

2024.10.2 Submit initial draft
2024.10.5 EIC assigns manuscript to SE

(0) 讚！ | 噔噔噔噔噔

Time is so long!

(0) 讚！ | olivermiaoerrrrrrrr

I submitted once before, the status was "submit" at the beginning, then "EIC assign manuscript to SE"......

Now I want to submit again, the status at the beginning is "Manuscript received by admin".

Why is this?

(0) 讚！ | Pygmalion

Out of scope. I waited so long just to receive this.

(0) 讚！ | Chris

May I ask how the progress is going now? The processing speed in front of this publication is so slow.

(0) 讚！ | XX啊

2024.07.09 管理员收到手稿
2024.07.24 主编将手稿分配给副编辑

The manuscript was received by the admin on July 9, 2024.
The EIC assigned the manuscript to the SE on July 24, 2024.

(0) 讚！ | Chris

2024.07.08 管理员收到手稿
2024.07.18 编辑将手稿分配给编委

(0) 讚！ | Andyme

2023.6.1 First time submit initial draft
9.18 revise and resubmit
10.11 submit after revision
12.13 Awaiting SE Recommendation
12.16 revise and resubmit
12.19 submit after revision

2024.2.8 Accept Without Changes

(0) 讚！ | MelanchoLee

What field does the OP work in?

(0) 讚！ | MelanchoLee

2023.10.16 Manuscript received by admin
2023.10.19 EIC assign manuscript to SE
out of scope
This journal is really unbelievable, more than a week for this

(0) 讚！ | wizardwangjiang

2023.6.1 Submission of initial draft
2023.6.7 EIC assigns AE
2023.6.12 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
2023.7.31 Awaiting Reviewer Scores

The direction is relatively niche, and it may be difficult to find reviewers. From 6.12 to 7.31, almost two months were spent on assigning reviewers. Currently, waiting for the first review to come back (edited on 2023.8.31

(1) 讚！ | MelanchoLee

What did the original poster submit after getting rejected?

(0) 讚！ | 陈昱衡

The review speed is very fast, and the first review came back in less than two months. However, luck is not very good.

(0) 讚！ | 陈昱衡

Wave energy harvesting. There were three reviewers, and two of them had generally positive opinions with minor revisions. However, one of them completely dismissed my work, and it got rejected. It was a stroke of bad luck, so I decided to submit it to IEEE Transactions on Energy Conservation instead.

(0) 讚！ | 陈昱衡

2022.10.13 Submit
2022.12.19 First Review: Revise and Resubmit. One reviewer recommended acceptance directly, while the other two reviewers had mostly positive opinions but requested additional experiments.
2023.01.27 Revision
2023.03.06 Second Review: Revise and Resubmit. Two reviewers recommended acceptance, while the other reviewer had a minor issue.
2023.03.08 Revision
2023.04.14 Accept Without Changes
Previously, the paper was rejected once by this journal. Overall, I am satisfied with the reviewers' comments and find their expertise to be high.

(0) 讚！ | birdman

My job is purely simulation, and I have received it.

(0) 讚！ | 科研yy

Excuse me, would pure simulation be considered as insufficient workload and be rejected for publication?

(0) 讚！ | 电气小子

June 10th - Submit
August 13th - Revise and resubmit
September 14th - Revise
October 13th - Accept Without Changes
Overall, the journal review process is relatively fast. There were three reviewers in the first round of review, one suggesting major revisions, one suggesting minor revisions, and the last reviewer directly rejecting the paper due to insufficient innovation. The editor requested major revisions, which took one month to complete, and the revised version was accepted directly.

(17) 讚！ | 科研yy

Does this mean "submitted for review"?

(1) 讚！ | 石岐拉莫斯

Explain that the reason for the slow first submission is because Reviewer 3 always provided more comments each time, with the comments filled with exclamation marks. It took two months to receive their feedback, which was overwhelming. At that time, I even started looking for another journal because of this. That's why it took a long time to submit this time. I have submitted to this journal before and the review process was very fast, with the first review usually returned in less than a month. The Editor-in-Chief of this journal is also really nice, and their reminders are always effective, with a good attitude.

(0) 讚！ | 武器大师成龙