I am currently major-major-minor-minor. It has been almost 2 months since I submitted my minor, but I still haven't heard back

(0) 讚！ | Echo11111

Do you have a specific timeline? Thank you! I have been waiting for a long time too

(0) 讚！ | Echo11111

This journal really feels top-notch in terms of peer review standards (even slower..). For my paper, it went through two reviewers for major revisions, then another two reviewers for minor revisions and back to major revisions, and then more reviewers for major revisions again.. It feels like resubmission is basically starting the review process all over again, from submission to acceptance it took over two years

(0) 讚！ | virter

May I ask how many reviewers generally there are for this journal? After submitting for a long time (almost a year), I received feedback asking me to revise and resubmit, with only two reviewers' comments. I want to ask, will there be additional reviewers after resubmission? Will the process take as long as before after resubmission?

(0) 讚！ | 小宝bei

Hello, so does that mean additional reviewers will be added after the journal is revised?

(0) 讚！ | 小宝bei

Sent, and even the first minor revision was turned into major revision after adding reviewers

(0) 讚！ | virter

Has the minor repair been sent for external review?

(0) 讚！ | Echo11111

Submitted an article, took a total of 25 months from submission to acceptance, with the following process: Submit-Major-Minor-Major-Major-Minor-Accept. The number of reviewers increased from 4 at the beginning to approximately 10, for reference

(4) 讚！ | virter

The reviewers are very professional, but the review process is quite long, lasting almost a year, of course, there are also reasons for my own delays. It is a prestigious journal in the field of AI, and it is still worth submitting if the topic is relevant

(0) 讚！ | ddd98

Is the repair opinion detailed?

(1) 讚！ | stalt

Too slow, rejected after 10 months. It is recommended to modify and reapply, but it is also too slow, not recommended.

(16) 讚！ | ydyq

Hello, may I ask what the result of your first review is? How long does it take to receive news after the first review is returned for correction?

(0) 讚！ | Echo11111

It took 14 months to be published, it was not because the article was poorly written, nor the revision time was too long, it was simply the efficiency of the whole journal was low and the editor was not so responsible. No reviewer was found and the article was shelved there. It took 6 months for the first review, and then various decisions was made. There had been no problems of the review comments. It took associate editor and editor-in-chief a month to make decisions, until then, it was dealt with low efficiency. I checked it and found that not only me, but most of those whose articles were accepted had the same situation similar to me. Overall, the journal’s price/performance ratio is too low.

(5) 讚！ | SwedishLittleBaby

It took one year and a half from submission to acceptance, those with short review time take 8 to 10 months, and the most of them took one year for acceptance. It is said that this journal intends to raise the review speed, but it means stricter. I carefully searched the acceptance time of this journal and found that those being accepted in more than 2 years were also available in each issue. If there is something (significant) in the article and you are not in a hurry, you can have a try. However, if you want to publish something valueless, then it is not recommended.

(8) 讚！ | jason623

A bimonthly journal. The journal’s goal is to have reviews completed within 10 weeks, but considering the time of looking for reviewers before that, the decision-making about that, you are lucky if you get the first review comments in 4 to 5 months. Many articles are published after more than a year. Reviewers are critical.

(10) 讚！ | 小w同学