Refused in 6 days due to lack of model and theory.

(0) 讚！ | dzgcxzndx

Submitted 2 papers, both of which received external reviews and results were released after 2 months. One paper was rejected, while the other required major revisions. The revised paper was accepted for publication one month after resubmission, which was considered relatively fast.

(0) 讚！ | 水环境菜鸡

Two months' time, one reviewer criticized my English proficiency, while the other claimed lack of originality and rejected the submission outright. Is this all the feedback I get after two months? It's simply a waste of time. Why not just submit the good ones?

(1) 讚！ | TimeFrezzer

The reviewer's opinion is very objective.

(2) 讚！ | Vicky

6.29 Submission; 8.14 Rejection. The comments given by both reviewers were rejections, but the comments were very far-fetched.

(0) 讚！ | lope

There are some problems with the previous one. It was submitted on February 10, 2018, and rejected on March 20, 2019.

(0) 讚！ | 大鱼的猫

It was submitted on February 26, 2018, and rejected on March 29, 2019.

(0) 讚！ | 大鱼的猫

Good journals, many of the big cattle in the field of environmental chemistry were submitted in 2017.

(2) 讚！ | beika

1 month to return to minor repair, received after 3 days, very fast, of course, the article can not be too bad, and one is directly rejected.A little unpopular, not many people know

(1) 讚！ | tjh

This journal is quite good, very fast. It is a publication of the Royal Society of Chemistry. This is their new name, so It should have an impact factor starting from next year. The impact factor was 2.1 before the name change.

(1) 讚！ | 查无此人