5.11 submit revision/with editor
5.16 under review

(0) 讚！ | MellowD

First Submission: 24.3.27
Under review: 24.4.8
Feedback: 24.4.20
I will get back soon when I resubmit the manuscript

(0) 讚！ | MellowD

Submitted on November 18, 2023 - under review until now. Why is it taking so long? Please, I beg you, let me pass

(0) 讚！ | 小wang

Update: 10.8 invited editor for review, 10.30 major revisions, 11.21 submission, 12.3 acceptance. It takes a long time in the early stage, so please be patient. The opinions of the editors and reviewers are very professional. It went smoothly in the later stage

(0) 讚！ | 是癸未吖

How many times has the latest paper been reviewed? Will the reviewers have a chance to review it again after the major revision?

(0) 讚！ | cookies123

During my doctoral studies, I published three papers in Algal Research, around 21. The whole process was quite quick, approximately three months. However, the most recent paper submitted in January 22 was not published until 23. This journal is indeed good, with many people in our field submitting to it. I hope AR continues to improve, and for those of us who will be future reviewers, let's try to speed up the process together

(0) 讚！ | Seaweed1

Update: 8.20 with editor; 8.28 Editor Invited; 10.3 Editor Declined Invitation; hoping to invite the editor soon

(0) 讚！ | 是癸未吖

After submitting the manuscript, it first went through "with editor", and then suddenly two weeks later it changed to "editor invited". It has been another two weeks since then, and it is still in this status. Has anyone encountered this situation before? Has the editor sent it out for review, or is it just sitting there with no one taking action?

(0) 讚！ | cookies123

Any recent submissions? It's been 3 weeks and we're still waiting for an editor invitation, is this normal?

(0) 讚！ | 是癸未吖

It is quite normal. If you are not sure, you can contact the editor

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

Why did the status change from "with editor" to "Editor Invited"?

(0) 讚！ | 是癸未吖

Usually it is because the editor has been invited to review your manuscript

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

Heavy research focus: Lipid metabolism sharing experience: 2023.8.17 Submitted to Journalmark. Updates will be notified later

(0) 讚！ | 是癸未吖

Posted in early May, rejected at the end of July, two reviewers, one agreed, one disagreed, rejected by the editor.
After revising in early October, submitted again.
Three reviewers, two of them remain unchanged in their opinions, the third one delayed for a long time and said there was no innovation, directly rejected; rejected by the editor.
Overall, the quality of the journal is okay, most of the reviewers' opinions are acceptable, but it is very slow and also acts as a gatekeeper for Q1 journals, always in Q2, the cost-effectiveness is not high. I will not submit to this journal again.

(0) 讚！ | Jackiiiie

The text translates to: "It's just that the review speed is relatively slow, and the partition has dropped to Zone 3."

(4) 讚！ | 墨子文

Posted on January 3rd, reviewed one month later, major revisions on March 2nd, delayed after revisions until March 29th for external review, approximately received the initial results on May 26th with the status changed to "required reviews completed," finally accepted on July 8th.

Overall, the experience was good, and the reviewers were very professional, raising many important questions. The journal specializes in algae research and has average expectations for the quality of articles. It would be great if the process was a bit faster, but if you are willing to wait, this journal is a good choice.

(1) 讚！ | hema123

The speed is not very fast, and I still haven't made it to Q1.

(0) 讚！ | Jackiiiie

AR is considered a well-recognized journal in the industry, but its classification is somewhat precarious. The overall speed of handling manuscripts is really slow, it can't be praised. Recently, there should be two reviewers for each submission, and it takes a long time to wait for the revised manuscript to be returned to the editor. I submitted in September 2021 and went through major revisions and minor revisions. It probably stayed in the editor's hands for more than a month. Still, it's acceptable, which can be seen as a consolation. I hope to stand my ground in the second tier.

(3) 讚！ | yyy宫商角徵羽

It has been 5 days since submission and it is still in "Editor Invited" status. I feel that the journal's speed is a bit slow.

(0) 讚！ | PMon

Due to the many factors that can affect the efficacy of animal experiments or clinical treatments, unless the results clearly show a synergistic effect that significantly increases the effectiveness compared to the sum of each drug, it is generally referred to as an additive effect

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

ORCID is an open researcher and contributor identifier (Researcher and Contributor ID). ORCID ID is a unique and persistent academic identity for authors, which can distinguish them from other researchers and record all their related research activities at the same time. Authors need to log in to their account and then associate their ORCID ID in the account information settings

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to determine whether two drugs have a synergistic effect or an additive effect?

(0) 讚！ | 陶宜三岁啦

How to add ORCID iD if it is not provided when the article is published?

(0) 讚！ | 破戒阳平

10.06 Submission
10.13 Editing suggestions for improvement. After the 13th, the revised version will be returned to the editor on the 19th.
10.20 Editing suggests making some modifications to the article's details.
10.22 The revised document without markings was forgotten to be submitted, and it was resubmitted to the editor.
10.27 External review.
12.17 The first review is completed, and the reviewer requests answers to questions and some modifications and additions to certain parts of the article. The editor provided a major revision.
01.05 The revised version is returned to the editor, and it will be sent for external review again on the 8th.
02.07 The second review is completed, and the editor provided minor revisions and suggested further proofreading.
02.26 After the minor revisions, it is returned to the editor.
02.28 Acceptance.
03.10 Publication.

(152) 讚！ | 二槑小屁孩

Looking at the reviewers and editors, generally the editors are quite fast. They will find two reviewers, and if both reviewers reject, then it will be rejected directly. If one approves and one rejects, they will find a third reviewer. The speed is still acceptable! Usually 1-2 months.

(2) 讚！ | Alger