11.1 Awaiting AE Recommendation, estimated to wait for a frustrating 4 months.

(0) 讚！ | ggyyg

9.24 revised
There is still no news as of 10.14, the speed of processing the second instance is a bit slow.

(0) 讚！ | ggyyg

8.26 major revision

(0) 讚！ | ggyyg

The review process is relatively fast and the review comments are clear.

(0) 讚！ | zibozhou

7.15 submitted to journal
8.4 Awaiting Reviewer Scores

(0) 讚！ | ggyyg

Received: December 29, 2023
Accepted: March 19, 2024

(0) 讚！ | hyjzy

Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese and title it ":" and ":" respectively: Google Translate

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Subject: Submission column, article title, published pen name.
Content: The full content of the article.

Author information:

Your real contact address, postal code, name, email address, landline phone, mobile phone, QQ number (indicate QQ name), any other contact information you feel necessary to leave (such as a brief introduction

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The journal sent me a letter, but I can't understand it. What should I do?

(0) 讚！ | Darlene Pepys

What are the contents included in the journal sending email?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: 6.20 I submitted in September, rejected on August 20, and the reviewer's comments were very nice, with lots of constructive suggestions. The editor-in-chief decided to reject it, but encouraged me to resubmit, giving me two months to revise it. On September 23, I revised it according to the reviewer's comments and sent it back to the original two reviewers for reevaluation. On October 25, I received the reviews, and both reviewers were very satisfied; the editor-in-chief suggested major revisions. On November 10, I revised it according to the suggestions. On November 21, the editor-in-chief rejected it!!! After nearly 6 months, the article was completely revised as requested, the reviewers were very satisfied, yet it was inexplicably rejected!! I really feel that the editor-in-chief is being unfair. I do not recommend submitting to this journal

(0) 讚！ | 是你的海荣呀

The past was good, but falling so much now is scary. I want to get back to the level of scoring 3 points next year, but it might be really difficult

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Sharing of experience: This journal is not indexed in common databases, including NCBI pubmed, so it is rarely retrieved and the citation rate should be relatively low. However, the peer review process of the journal is still quite strict, and the editors are also very cautious. My article was initially rejected, but after major revisions and resubmission, there were still many opinions. I did everything I could to meet the requirements of the reviewers and editors. I carefully replied and it was accepted immediately. It took almost 1 year

(0) 讚！ | 无相嘉煊

Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: Do Chinese people not know about this magazine? Or are they not interested? Personally, I think the quality of the articles in this magazine is quite high!

(0) 讚！ | 德温贝儿

Maybe people in China don’t know about this journal? Or not interested? I think the quality of the manuscripts in this journal is quite high.

(12) 讚！ | 119004229@qq.com

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: I recently accepted a GWAS article and feel that the IF of this journal will increase in the future. After all, the articles are all based on big data analysis, the annual publication volume is small, and it is also an open-access journal with strong dissemination and high citation probability

(0) 讚！ | 螳螂芸溪

just accepted 1 article, I feel that this journal IF will go up.

(11) 讚！ | 119004229@qq.com

Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: Just received one submission, and I feel this journal is definitely on the rise

(0) 讚！ | 万花海凡

Commission 1.5-2 years

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁