Hired after modification

(0) 讚！ | 卑微小王

The submission was made on December 3, 2024, and was rejected on December 30, 2024. Five reviewers provided feedback, three of which suggested minor revisions. The work was deemed interesting by the reviewers, but ultimately rejected by the editor. After making the revisions, the manuscript was resubmitted, but was rejected by the editor in March 2025.

(0) 讚！ | 江科大杨博士

Please also ask the original poster, how did things develop afterwards?

(0) 讚！ | 穷凶极恶

Is a journal with a 100% review ratio in Chemical Reviews also a garbage journal?

(0) 讚！ | 科研小瓦罐

After you finish your rating, will it show "under review" when you submit for approval?

(0) 讚！ | S.Tow

Can I ask, what is the status of your application? Mine has just entered the evaluation stage, is there a high chance of rejection?

(0) 讚！ | S.Tow

The processing speed is very fast, with a one-week review period, and feedback from the first round of review is returned within two weeks. All four reviewers are experts in the field, and the feedback is quickly accepted after it is received.

(0) 讚！ | 蝴蝶结和橡皮筋

Can't agree more. Trash journal.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名投稿

This is the same garbage as bioactive materials, both are niche journals, don't bother if no one cares.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名投稿

Please translate the following passage into English: 1

(0) 讚！ | SCI 不分区

The chief editor processes very quickly, which is commendable. Here is the submission timeline:
2025.1.11 awaiting editor processing
2025.1.15 awaiting reviewer selection
2025.1.17 awaiting reviewer assignment
2025.1.18 awaiting reviewer scores
2025.2.3 awaiting editor recommendation
2025.2.6 Rejected by three reviewers, two for minor revisions and one for rejection (reason given was lack of innovation, along with a few other minor issues, two of which were incorrect and two were common knowledge in the field). The chief editor ultimately decided to reject the submission. That same day, an appeal letter of 15 pages was written to the chief editor, but no response was received within a week (possibly due to us being an unknown small research group in China).

(0) 讚！ | SCI 不分区

Do you also say "nature" like this?

(0) 讚！ | 科研小瓦罐

Is the volume of articles published by EES high? Are foreign ones better, while domestic ones are worse?

(0) 讚！ | 科研小瓦罐

Submitted on October 20, 2024
Revised on November 19, 2024 (minor revisions from all three reviewers)
Returned for further revisions on December 5, 2024
Accepted on January 2, 2025
The submission process was not long, but the review process was relatively short, with reviewers providing feedback in about 10 days. The manuscript stayed with the editor for a longer period, possibly to control the publication volume. The article was initially rejected after being submitted to Angew, so the author decided to try a domestic journal. Hopefully, it will continue to improve!

(0) 讚！ | 米玉米233

26-Jul-2024 Submission
23-Sep-2024 Major revision
23-Oct-2024 Revise and resubmit
07-Nov-2024 Minor revision
18-Nov-2024 Revise and resubmit again
19-Nov-2024 Accepted
The initial review took two months, very slow, with a total of 30 comments from four reviewers.
One of the reviewers was still not satisfied after the resubmission, so a minor revision was requested.
The process from the second resubmission to acceptance was quick.
The first major revision exceeded the deadline, and the editor granted an extension. The second minor revision also exceeded the deadline, and the editor granted another extension. Thank you to the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 20241216

It seems like it's not a double-blind review, right? (Awkward)

(0) 讚！ | 酱两度

The small research group submitted this paper after submitting to AM, AFM, and ACS Nano. There were five reviewers in a double-blind review process, and they all requested revisions.

(0) 讚！ | 一眼倾城

This journal has a high impact factor, but the quality of the articles...is definitely much better than Nano Letters and ACS Nano, completely outclassing them.

(0) 讚！ | 已注销

May I ask how long the wait is?

(0) 讚！ | ~~byy

I wonder how great an article needs to be to be submitted for approval, haha

(0) 讚！ | 笨蛋水凝胶啊

Circle journal? The group gave it a try, but was indeed rejected; following this practice, the impact factor is estimated to increase

(0) 讚！ | d_hy

How long until we get the results?

(0) 讚！ | don

Definitely ACS Nano and Nano Letters are not on the same level

(0) 讚！ | 勤劳的小蜜蜂啊

I am also awaiting reviewer selection

(0) 讚！ | 浅川。

Which is better, this journal or ACS Nano and Nano Letters?

(0) 讚！ | 润成