I would like to know how long it generally takes from the completion of the review to the editor's decision

(0) 讚！ | 月亮是我嘚

This journal is really speechless. My article is about reinforcement learning of multi-agent reasoning prediction. The previous one said it was widely interested by the AIJ audience, but this time it was rejected for not being of widely reader interest. The journal clearly stated that it accepts articles on reasoning, planning, constraints, and the literature it accepts includes autonomous driving reasoning prediction, safe reinforcement learning. I also emailed the AE and the editor to appeal separately. The former said he wouldn't discuss this issue with the author, and the latter still said the reason for rejection was not a judgment on the quality of the paper, but a judgment based on the types of papers not being of widely reader interest. He himself is doing multi-agent reasoning, and is just talking nonsense. So speechless

(3) 讚！ | cjm

Why choose the Chinese Academy of Sciences Zone Two?

(0) 讚！ | cjm

In 2022, only 96 papers are accepted, which is a rare occurrence in the top journals of artificial intelligence, with higher theoretical requirements for articles

(0) 讚！ | cs_Mark

The main journal has about 200 articles per year, while PAMI reached over 600 articles last year

(61) 讚！ | 灌水

What's wrong with the templates in Aisville? The titles cannot be displayed correctly.

(0) 讚！ | cjm

Hello, may I ask how long did your first trial take?

(0) 讚！ | 熊x

It feels like there are more and more domestic units of this in the past two years.

(0) 讚！ | lpxzk

I have submitted twice. The deputy editor-in-chief asked some questions about the previous manuscript, but it was rejected without being sent for review! After half a year of serious revision, I submitted again. Now half a month has passed. Yesterday the status changed to decision in press. It feels bad! And I am prepared for another tragedy. I’m so tired! Is it so difficult to enter the mainstream of artificial intelligence?

(3) 讚！ | 润萱

The editor’s opinion is: AIJ is the top journal, your research field is XXXX, which has a small research audience. Besides the experiment description is unclear, so the manuscript was rejected directly. The rejection is inexplicable.

(1) 讚！ | 龙中鸟

It's too slow. The level of papers is much lower than PAMI and IJCV. It feels like it is no longer the top journal as before.

(5) 讚！ | 匿名1223

The quality has dropped significantly, and the hope is getting better and better.

(1) 讚！ | Anonymous

This is a traditional journal that fails to keep up with the pace of contemporary artificial intelligence. The main focus of this journal is still the original theoretical algorithm. Many of the published articles are to difficult to understand; thus, the IF plunged this year.

(0) 讚！ | sxc

This year's impact factor is estimated to plummet, I hope not to become 3 District

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

How to say it, this journal used to be a very old journal. It was a cow in the past few years, and it is not so top now.Most of the articles in the article are IJCAI, an extension of AAAI, but these two will soon become a water club.So the level is now significantly lower, but it is still very good for traditional artificial intelligence disciplines, and it is general for machine learning.

(4) 讚！ | Anonymous

Editing and processing manuscripts is faster, the paper focuses on innovation (innovativeStrong papers, even if the work is not perfect, there are opportunities to be modified.) However, the publication seems to only give a chance to overhaul. That is, after the overhaul, there are generally only two results: accept or reject.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

The old top journals in the field of artificial intelligence, but there are not many people contributing domestically, only more in Nanjing University.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

One of the top publications in the field of artificial intelligence seems to be a bit of a theory.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名