Hello, may I ask if it is basic research or clinical research?

(0) 讚！ | 龙爪淑涵

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Focused research direction: basic research
Experience sharing: Submitted in late August, received first review comments after 50 days, revised and resubmitted by the end of November, with Christmas holiday in between. Received second review comments after over a month of revision, then submitted revisions for second review, and accepted one month later. The journal is very rigorous, requiring all protein figures

(0) 讚！ | 潜龙彦君

All uncut gel

(0) 讚！ | 残月智敏

Emphasis on research direction: basic research
Experience sharing: All the original data include all the protein maps, do they?

(0) 讚！ | 苍风子默

Research Focus: basic research
Experience Sharing: Submitted on 9.24, received feedback after a month. Revised on 12.24, another month passed. Finally, it took two weeks for statistical review. The process was very quick each time, but the journal has high requirements, especially for all original experimental data, including repetitive data. It's not an easy journal

(0) 讚！ | 残月智敏

How did it turn out later? How many days did it take to give feedback?

(0) 讚！ | Paul Shakespeare

I have been under review for 28 days

(0) 讚！ | 卫华来了

Anyone available to pick up?

(0) 讚！ | 金山燕伟

Submission is relatively difficult, requiring a high level of creativity

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞高朗

Is it difficult to submit articles to this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 是你的欣奥呀

How long have you been under review?

(0) 讚！ | 一吃就胖小高潮

Emphasis on research direction: basic research
Experience sharing: Submitted a paper on 12-12, under review for 25 days

(0) 讚！ | 血天树潼

If the main part has been completed, it is suggested to start with the results first; if the main results are still in progress, you can start with the methods and introduction

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

This varies from person to person. If the main results have been achieved, it is generally recommended to start with the results. If the main results are still in progress, it is possible to start with the methods and introduction

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Why is it recommended to write a research article starting from the results? Is it okay to start writing from the methods section?

(0) 讚！ | Darlene Pepys

What is the general writing order for a research article?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 
Research focus: cardiovascular disease 
Experience sharing: The review speed is very fast, with feedback received within one month from submission and four expert reviewers, including one statistical expert. After completing the experiment revisions, the review results can be returned within 2 weeks. The article has been accepted

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞高朗

How long did the first trial take, brother?

(0) 讚！ | 苍风凌翠

I have made several revisions back and forth. I submitted it at the end of 2019 and just received the acceptance notice now. The reviewers were very professional, and the journal was efficient. Due to my own reasons, it took a long time. The first major revision in 2020 was delayed for six months before being sent back for the first round of revisions. The second and third rounds were also given three months for revisions. Throughout the process, it was still very nice, and I am looking forward to the article being published online.

(2) 讚！ | 丽丽cherish

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission accuracy rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: The journal under AHA feels on the same level as hypertension, stroke, etc., just focusing on different diseases, the level is absolutely fine. I submitted on May 14th, the first review was very fast, totaling 18 days. The two reviewers and the editor asked a total of more than ten questions, and I spent a month doing experiments to make revisions. After revising, it was accepted directly in a month. Quite happy about it, ATVB is a journal that I often read literature from, and I have also published articles myself ?

(0) 讚！ | 鹰爪嘉树

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Submitted in early December, just in time for Christmas, but still received first-round comments on January 7th. Both external reviewers had very positive feedback, with one providing two experimental suggestions and the other pointing out a few minor text issues. After resubmitting on February 20th, I received an acceptance letter from the reviewers on March 5th, requesting a few formatting changes. Finally, the paper was officially accepted on March 19th, and I saw it online on April 9th, just over two weeks later. Overall, the process took a little over three months, depending on the first-round comments and the time needed for additional experiments. AHA's efficiency is commendable, and the journal staff are very responsive to emails

(0) 讚！ | Charles Kelsen

Do you accept case reports and reviews?

(0) 讚！ | 名轩三岁啦

Submit an article to Circulation, and once you receive feedback, please send it to ATVB for consideration as the first reviewer

(0) 讚！ | 七伤冰梦

The review speed is very fast, and the news are usually given in half a month. However, it is not easy to make articles published on this journal. There were three reviewers, two of them were relatively friendly, and the other one raised a lot of questions. After several revisions, it took more than a year from submission to acceptance. The impact factor is not high, but it is a journal in Q1 and it is difficult to publish on this journal.

(2) 讚！ | yjm1979

The review speed is quite fast

(0) 讚！ | Oliver Jerry