2021.7.12   Submitted
2021.10.8   Major revision
2022.1.6    Revised
2022.2.10   Rejected
Both reviewers in the second round suggested minor revisions, but the editor-in-chief rejected it outright. The power of the editor-in-chief is indeed significant. I should promptly submit it to another journal.

(1) 讚！ | ice90

It took about 2 months for the first review (from May 21 to July 16); It took 1 month for the minor revision (From July 31 to August 31); It was accepted after the third review (there was no external comments) (from September 10 to September 19).

(0) 讚！ | xiang1989yu

is modified three times. Finally, I have not modified the patience and wrote the editor.The letter means that you can send it, don't even send it, don't want to waste time, and accept it in a few days.No face fee is charged.

(2) 讚！ | 冯裕

The review period is OK; our recent publication it took five months to be accepted (we had two rounds of revisions to complete).

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is the most demanding and fastest in the article, but the editor is very good; it is also a small number of free journals.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The impact factor is a bit low, the review speed is a bit slow, three round trips, and finally insist on the author's own point of view, the editor is fairly kind, and finally received.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The first trial and the second trial are basically one month, the second trial is rejected, the sad reminder is very

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

reviewing slowerAfter half a year of my select, I was urged twice to be rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Reviewing is too slow, about 26 articles a year, quarterly, low impact factor, high demand, 3 trialsThe rejected example.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名