Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Focused research direction: lung cancer; experience sharing in bioinformatics analysis: Submitted on 20230913, under review on 20230914, first review returned on 20231012, major revision required according to two reviewers on 20231211, resubmitted to journal on 20231224, second review returned with minor revision required on 20240103, resubmitted to journal on 20240118, accepted on 202402. Overall, the speed of review is considered relatively fast. The articles accepted have a combination of bioinformatics and simple validation (immunohistochemistry + clinical cohorts). Considering other comments on slow review speed, it can be boldly speculated that the efficiency of handling manuscripts by different editors varies greatly

(0) 讚！ | 东京婉奕

Hello, I want to ask how to successfully register for this journal's submission account? I cannot receive the registration email at all, so I can't complete the login

(0) 讚！ | 北海仙仪

Hello, I want to ask how to successfully register for the submission account of this journal? I can't receive the registration email at all, so I can't complete the login

(0) 讚！ | 北海仙仪

Hello, did you submit the article in the end? I can't receive the verification email when I go to the magazine's official website, so I don't know where to start submitting

(0) 讚！ | 北海仙仪

Hello, I would like to ask how to successfully register for the submission account of this journal. I haven't received the registration email at all, so I can't complete the login

(0) 讚！ | 北海仙仪

Is the editor assigned still waiting to be reviewed by the reviewer? Will rushing the paper leave a bad impression?

(0) 讚！ | 蓬莱山咏思

How are you doing, my friend?

(0) 讚！ | 蓬莱山咏思

Is the editor assigned not yet in the hands of the reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 蓬莱山咏思

Friend, how are you doing?

(0) 讚！ | 蓬莱山咏思

Have you accepted it? Has the assigned editor not reached the reviewer yet? Would a deadline reminder result in rejection?

(0) 讚！ | 蓬莱山咏思

Is the editor assigned still not in the hands of the reviewer?

(0) 讚！ | 蓬莱山咏思

I am also like this, how do you change behind?

(0) 讚！ | 东京振安

I used Word to put the table inside, and the Figure separately

(0) 讚！ | 气甲娅童

Hello, I would like to ask how to submit an article to this magazine. I am having trouble uploading it. Is a LaTex document required?

(0) 讚！ | 晏然来了

Exciting comments, you need to log in to view

(0) 讚！ | 晏然来了

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 50.0 Emphasized Research Direction: Lung Adenocarcinoma Experience Sharing: Initially submitted to this journal, only checked the comments after submission, thinking it would take a long time... But overall the speed was still okay 12.22.14 Received 12.15 Submitted for review 1.24 First review returned, minor revisions 2.2 Revised 2.18 Second review returned 2.19 Accepted 2.25 Published #lung cancer#

(0) 讚！ | 气甲娅童

Could you please tell me how things have changed since then?

(0) 讚！ | 七星同方

Could you please tell me what changes have occurred in the meantime?

(0) 讚！ | 七星同方

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Emphasis on research direction: Pulmonary cysts Experience sharing: It took 4 months from submission to the first review, and only one reviewer's comments were received. It has been three months since the second review, despite multiple reminders. Just now, another reviewer has been assigned. The efficiency of this journal is really low, so be cautious when submitting articles

(0) 讚！ | 黑沙箫笛

Help me, please!

(0) 讚！ | 风神文宣

Regretting it, it's better not to switch to this

(0) 讚！ | 风神文宣

Recommended by other magazines to republish in this magazine. BMC is notoriously slow, and now I regret it a little

(0) 讚！ | 风神文宣

It took me a total of 13 months

(0) 讚！ | 北马美美

Brothers, is it still so slow now?? It’s been 5 days and the editor hasn’t been assigned yet

(0) 讚！ | 海白来了

Submitted for nine months and finally rejected. In the first round of review, two reviewers provided friendly comments. The editor requested a major revision. After revisions were made, the editor could not locate the original reviewers. Therefore, a new reviewer was invited, who seemed to be Chinese. The questions raised by this new reviewer were extremely harsh and somewhat amateurish. It seems that Chinese people tend to make things difficult for other Chinese. Since the previous two reviewers could not be found, the editor rejected the submission based on the new reviewer's comments. It's all about luck when submitting papers. If you encounter reviewers who are not competent and provide random comments, it's just bad luck

(0) 讚！ | 爱景小郎君