期刊簡介 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | PHYSICS ESSAYS (According to the latest JCR data, this journal is not indexed in the JCR.) LetPub Score 3.8
51 ratings
Rate
Reputation 4.4 Influence 2.6 Speed 7.1 | |||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | PHYS ESSAYS | |||||||||||
ISSN | 0836-1398 | |||||||||||
h-index | 13 | |||||||||||
CiteScore | N.A. | |||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 83.30%自引率趨勢 | |||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| |||||||||||
官方網站 | http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/pe/pe | |||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | ||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | |||||||||||
出版商 | ||||||||||||
主題領域 | PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY | |||||||||||
出版國/地區 | CANADA | |||||||||||
發行頻率 | ||||||||||||
創刊年 | 0 | |||||||||||
每年文章數 | 60每年文章數趨勢 | |||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 0.00% | |||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q4
| |||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | ||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0836-1398%5BISSN%5D | |||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: Slow, 6-12 Week(s) | |||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Easy | |||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| |||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[PHYSICS ESSAYS] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: 单程光速不可测是伪科学 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-10-25 15:49:26 評論於 Congratulations! Your article "A Euclidean geometric model that has a maximum speed c" has recently been published in the online version of the journal you submitted to (publication link). LetPub is pleased to convey this good news to you and wishes you to publish more innovative ideas in more influential SCI journals to share your outstanding work with your peers!(2) 讚! | 单程光速不可测是伪科学 |
作者: zhutou 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2021-06-24 15:34:14 評論於 Li Zifeng denies the long-standing existence of relativity theory. Sadly, the editorial department could not provide strong review comments and rejected Li's paper. You have to make the author convinced. Even more unfortunate is that after Li Zifeng's paper was publicly published, no one in the international community was capable of writing a comment to refute Li Zifeng's paper. Where did those reviewers who talked big and mocked Li Zifeng go? Li Zifeng has provided you with such a great opportunity to publish academic papers, so come out and publish your own academic papers to refute it. The reviewers arrogantly rejected the paper, but when the article was published elsewhere, they lost their power. It can be seen that the original evaluation of the reviewers was completely irresponsible, and they dared to make random evaluations without understanding. The editors also did not fulfill their responsibilities. The purpose of conducting experiments is to obtain theoretical knowledge, but the current international academic community is obsessed with experiments, and no one is interested in theory. Even prestigious scientific journals like SCI cannot find reviewers for theoretical articles related to undergraduate knowledge. This shows the extent to which the international scientific community has deteriorated.(1) 讚! | zhutou |
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us