This journal is really risky to submit to, it's way out of line. The review process takes forever. After major revisions on the first round, the reviewers requested minor revisions, including changes to figures and formulas. It took 3 months to hear back with their feedback. Then, there was no response for two months after resubmission. The entire manuscript processing time has already been 1.5 years. When inquired via email, it was explained that the original reviewers declined to review again, so new reviewers need to be invited. Do the editors have no judgment at all?

(0) 讚！ | alpha2020

The review period is approximately one and a half months
Submitted on July 16, 23
Major revisions on August 30
Revision on October 12
Returned on November 19, stated as major revisions, but most of the review has been agreed upon, with the editor giving 5 review comments
Revised on January 11, 24
Accepted on January 22, published on February 29
Both the review experts and the editor are very professional
The provided revision time is very ample, ranging from 2-3 months, even if the issue could be resolved in one day

(0) 讚！ | 惘然子期

It is either an external review, or the journal is looking for reviewers. I waited for 9 months during the first phase. And into the second phase, it has been another 6 months and still no news

(0) 讚！ | zchn12

It must be very slow. I submitted an article 22 years ago, and each time the revision period is basically eight or nine months. Those in a hurry should be cautious about submitting. The reviewers are indeed very professional

(0) 讚！ | zchn12

Hello, how long does the "peer review in process" stage usually take? Has it already entered the external review stage? No changes after three months...graduating students are very anxious

(0) 讚！ | 章鱼chen儿920

Submitted on January 18th, 23.
Revised on September 7.
Resubmitted on September 28.
Still no news.
The reviewers are very professional, but they are really slow

(0) 讚！ | alpha2020

Hello senior, may I ask how long did you wait during the Peer review in process stage? Is this in the external review status? I am a bit anxious, it has been two and a half months and still no news

(0) 讚！ | 章鱼chen儿920

Not very fast, it takes about four months from submission to receiving feedback. The revision time would also take at least one or two months, which may not be suitable for those who are in a hurry to graduate. The journal reviewers are quite professional and their questions are accurate, requiring a certain level of innovation.

(0) 讚！ | zchn12

Is the review speed fast?

(0) 讚！ | piepie

May I ask how long is the review period for senior editors? Is there a high requirement for innovation?

(0) 讚！ | piepie

How long is the submission period? Is the requirement for content and algorithm innovation high?

(0) 讚！ | piepie

Is this journal article demanding a lot of innovation, including algorithms and content?

(0) 讚！ | piepie

2022.8.10 Delivery
2022.9.21 Major repair
2022.10.31 Return of manuscript
Received one week later

(3) 讚！ | miracle666

Yes, please wait a moment longer.

(0) 讚！ | zchn12

It has been approximately half a month.

(0) 讚！ | zchn12

May I ask how long after returning from the major revision you uploaded the modified draft?

(0) 讚！ | zchn12

May I ask how long after returning from the overhaul did you upload the revised draft?

(0) 讚！ | zchn12

This journal is too slow.
Submitted on 4.19.
Reviewed on 4.20.
It's already 8.5 and it's still under review. Unbelievable, the peer review process is also too slow.

(2) 讚！ | 贺啦啦啦

2021.11.3 Submission
2022.3.25 Feedback for revision, major revision
2022.5.13 Submission of revised version
2022.7.18 Acceptance

The reviewers and editors were both very good!

(3) 讚！ | 麦子粉

Submitted in mid-February.
Received feedback for revision at the end of March, requiring major revisions.
Received feedback for revision in mid-May, requiring minor revisions.
Accepted on July 11th.
Two reviewers provided many constructive comments.
The editor was very diligent and reliable. The feedback was provided promptly. It is worth submitting.

(12) 讚！ | Feng77

Excuse me, senior, for this journal submission, it is currently in the peer review process. Is it under external review?

(0) 讚！ | 爱祖国

Submitted on August 2, 2019; and received comments on April 21, 2020 requiring for major revision; revision submitted on May 10; accepted on the May 16. There are few journals in the field of reliability, and the quality of this journal is still good. Algorithm innovation is required.

(4) 讚！ | Andy234

The intersection of mechanical engineering disciplines, the quality of journals is very good, hope to be able to!!

(6) 讚！ | WW

I have published several articles here. Qingqing Zhai, Rui Peng*, L. Xing, and Jun Yang, 2013. "BDD-based Reliability Evaluation of k-out-of-(n k) Warm Standby Systems Subject to Fault-Level Coverage," Journal of Risk and Reliability,227(5): 540-548. Xiao Hui, Peng R.*, Wang, WB, Zhao, F., 2015. Optimal Element Loading for Linear Sliding Window Systems. Journal of Risk and Reliability 230 (1), 75-84.

(1) 讚！ | 笨猫

The quality of the journal is OK, the editor is more serious, the journal impact factor has been rising, and it has a certain influence on system reliability and risk.

(4) 讚！ | ABS