1-29 Submission
2-14 Review feedback
2-20 Revision
3-8 Pre-acceptance
3-13 Formatting revision
3-14 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | dmj1998

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Focused research areas: Neuroscience; Aging; Memory
Timeline for submission: Submission by 1-29, Review feedback by 2-14, Revision by 3-8, Pre-acceptance by 3-13, Final acceptance after formatting revision by 3-14

(0) 讚！ | 震雷艺诺

What's your current status?

(0) 讚！ | 无妄摄提格

Research focus: Sharing of experiences with schizophrenia: It has been almost a week since submission, but the manuscript has not been assigned to an editor yet. I plan to use it for my graduation. Can any experts share their experiences with submissions? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 八荒建玲

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them ":" and ":":

需要？

(0) 讚！ | Ina Gregory

Do we need to provide the raw data for this journal in the later stage?

(0) 讚！ | 金蛇红运

Do you need to provide original data for this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 金蛇红运

The first full paper in life
Submitted in September 2021, results came out at the end of October, major revisions required.
Revised and resubmitted after one month, minor revisions completed by the end of December.
Received acceptance in mid-February, with even more additions than the first major revision.
Hope this journal continues to improve!

(1) 讚！ | henryhkust

I have the same question!

(0) 讚！ | 初柳超级甜

Do you need to upload the original image of WB?!

(0) 讚！ | Albert Morley

Choose the topic for in-depth discussion; discuss the selected topic from multiple perspectives in a structured manner, with logical reasoning, clear explanation, and thorough analysis

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Highlight the innovation of your research, demonstrate significant characteristics that differentiate from others. The magnitude of the difference is another issue, the key is to have a distinction, as long as there is a difference, it is innovation

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is a profound discussion? How to deepen the depth of discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞孝礼

How to highlight the innovation of the article in the discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

How is the progress of this magazine this year? Why has no editor been assigned for a week?

(0) 讚！ | Griselda Ingersoll

How is the progress of the magazine this year? Why hasn't an editor been assigned even after a week?

(0) 讚！ | Griselda Ingersoll

Do you charge a page fee?

(0) 讚！ | 铁头翠槐

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: When submitting in 2017, I felt that the review process was quite strict and the requirements were high. The review speed was about one month, slightly longer compared to what I found online. It took about three months from submission to acceptance, with repeated reminders for revisions. Without reminders, it would probably take four months, and publication would require nearly half a year. This journal is getting better now and may improve further

(0) 讚！ | 傲寒平卉

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 50.0 Experience Sharing: The Neuroscience Bulletin editorial office has opened a Rapid Publication Track. For eligible submissions, they will be arranged to enter the fast track to speed up the peer review process. Compared to regular submissions, manuscripts entering the Rapid Publication Track can complete the review process in 1-2 weeks; the time from acceptance to online publication can also be shortened to within 20 working days. Manuscripts eligible for the Rapid Publication Track should meet one of the following conditions: 1. Manuscripts rejected by top international journals (such as Science, Nature and its subsidiaries, Cell and its subsidiaries, PNAS, Brain, etc.); Analysis: It is estimated that few submissions meet this criterion. 2. Manuscripts that have entered the peer review stage of internationally recognized influential journals in the field of neuroscience (such as J Neurosci, Mol Neurobiol, Glia, etc.), and have received review comments, but were withdrawn due to time constraints or other reasons; Analysis: At least one article rejected by Cell reports was accepted within a week (as clearly informed by the editorial office). 3. Original research papers with significant breakthroughs or discoveries in this field, in competitive relationships with international peers, and in need of early publication. Such manuscripts require a recommendation letter from at least one internationally renowned neuroscientist. Authors wishing to use the Rapid Publication Track should contact the editorial office of this journal (nsb@sibs.ac.cn) before submission. The editorial office will quickly evaluate the article. After evaluation, authors can log into the journal's online submission system to submit the manuscript, and the editorial office will then arrange for entry into the Rapid Publication Track. When contacting the editorial office before submission, authors should provide the following materials: 1. Full text and figures of the manuscript; 2. Review comments from the previous journal and authors' responses; 3. Or expert recommendation letter. For regular submissions, Neuroscience Bulletin can accept within around 50 days!

(0) 讚！ | 中原兴思

May I ask if the magazine has high requirements for Western blot images? Many of the images in my results were left by senior students and do not have images with loading controls or marker images. Thank you. And the experimental results are mainly based on Western blot, it is difficult to redo

(0) 讚！ | 摩柯根辈

Hello, do I need to submit the original western blot images for the magazine? Or just the whole membrane and marker images? I have too many western blot images, and it's hard to redo them without the whole membrane. Thank you~

(0) 讚！ | 摩柯根辈

Has your article been received now? I also submitted in July

(0) 讚！ | 上清文龙

Two weeks have passed and we are still Awaiting Reviewer Selection

(0) 讚！ | Sharon Dalton

Review speed: 3.0 sharing experience: Submitted at the end of April; Reviewed in early July, major revisions, three review comments, with the third comment being the most detailed; Resubmitted in early August; Returned for minor revisions in early September, focusing on specific sentence structure and grammar issues; Returned one week later; Accepted two days later. Actually, the review speed is still acceptable. The main reason for the delay was that it took a long time to find reviewers for the initial review, plus the time spent on self-revision. Otherwise, it could have been accepted in three months

(0) 讚！ | 东京冰可

Review speed: 6.0 Experience sharing: The first review took 4 months with two reviewers. The reviewers seem to be very serious, and major revisions were made

(0) 讚！ | Mark Keppel