As the specialization of academic disciplines increases, it is becoming increasingly difficult for journals to find appropriate peer reviewers. Therefore, requesting authors to recommend reviewers is a mutually beneficial practice: journals can find suitable reviewers and save time in searching for them, while authors can provide support through their networks and recommend scholars who are most able to understand the submitted papers

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Most journals require submissions in Word format, but there are also some that require submissions in PDF format

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Should I upload the article in Word or PDF format?

(0) 讚！ | 北国博达

What is a recommended reviewer/expert/peer?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄彦露

How long did it take you?

(0) 讚！ | 东风志青

Where can I see that an editor is assigned?

(0) 讚！ | 努力啊大可昕

Is this journal no longer accepting notes on chloroplast genomes?

(0) 讚！ | Jocelyn Stone

As long as we can maintain the SCI indexed journals, it will be fine. If the school adopts CiteScore for evaluation in the future, there is no need to worry. On one hand, CiteScore includes a wider range of journals, so this journal will definitely be included. On the other hand, it benefits smaller journals, reducing the differences between journals. I hope the school will adopt CiteScore

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 75.0 Experience Sharing: Received: 29 December 2016 Accepted: 17 February 2017 First Online: 1 March 2017 Submitted in the last few days of the year, the byproduct of transcriptome and genomics resequencing analysis laid the groundwork for some subsequent analyses. As a result, the complete mitochondrial genome of the species was assembled and submitted in the format of a technical note. It wasn't as fast as expected, with the editorial board sending an email on January 29th requesting revisions to some language and providing only one chance to do so. The revisions were sent back on February 10th and were accepted directly, with the overall speed being average and easily acceptable

(0) 讚！ | 无妄侠骞

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: 0.458

(0) 讚！ | 丽贝卡福勒

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Sharing experience: Damn it, the SSR development I accepted last year was merged with others' and published as one article. The author has merged at least hundreds of people, how can I cite it in the future?

(0) 讚！ | Page Adelaide

Submitted on December 21st, it has been over a month now, why is it still showing "Editor assigned"? Seeking advice

(0) 讚！ | 一只俊之呀

It has been over a month since the submission was made on December 21st, why is it still showing as "Editor assigned"? Need advice

(0) 讚！ | 绵掌冷玉

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: It is now required to have at least 20 different polymorphic markers, with at least 20 samples tested for each marker. Super fast speed, submitted on October 29th and accepted on November 1st!

(0) 讚！ | 深渊安青

Planning to submit an article, just wondering how much is the page fee? Do you charge any review fees?
No review fees. This magazine focuses on the protection of biodiversity

(0) 讚！ | 千斤诗岚

I plan to submit an article. I want to ask everyone, is the layout fee expensive? Is there no reviewing fee?

(0) 讚！ | 四风涵忍

Planning to submit an article, just wondering, is the page fee expensive? No review fees, right?

(0) 讚！ | 四风涵忍

Will species listed as data deficient in the IUCN Red List be accepted?
kun 2015-06-19 replied: It seems that there is no step for under review

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

It seems like there is no "under review" step

(0) 讚！ | 一只俊之呀

Editor assigned on February 27th, it's now March 11th and the paper is still not under review. Does this journal not have this process? Please help, submission ID 28474257. Anyone who has submitted to this journal, please share your experience

(0) 讚！ | 无冬学军

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 75.0
Experience Sharing: 1.4
Submission 1.6 Return by Language Editing 1.16 Resubmit after Editing 1.17 Editor Assigned 2.2 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 一只俊之呀