2024.8.11 Submission to journals
2024.8.11 with editor

(2) 讚！ | AroundSeeYou

After the peer review process has been completed, have you seen "Decision in Process" on your end, teacher?

(0) 讚！ | 奋斗000

After the review by the BS is completed, have you seen "Decision in Process" yet, teacher?

(0) 讚！ | 奋斗000

Has your Decision in Process appeared after the completion of the BS review, teacher??????

(0) 讚！ | 奋斗000

Has the decision been made after the completion of the BS review, teacher??????

(0) 讚！ | 奋斗000

Has the decision in process appeared after the BS review is completed, teacher???

(0) 讚！ | 奋斗000

Has the decision been made after the peer review of the BS manuscript, teacher?

(0) 讚！ | 奋斗000

After the peer review process is completed, have you received a "Decision in Process" notification, teacher?

(0) 讚！ | 奋斗000

Has the decision been made after the completion of the peer review process?

(0) 讚！ | 奋斗000

After the review is completed, have you seen "Decision in Process" yet, teacher?

(0) 讚！ | 奋斗000

Building Simulation.

(0) 讚！ | 奋斗000

Sharing the timeline from submission to acceptance for reference:
2023-08-09 submit
08-16 with editor
08-21 under review
09-03 required reviews completed
09-04 after the RRC here, it was sent for review again. Later, combining the feedback from reviewers, it was speculated that the editor felt the feedback was lacking and may have added another reviewer, resulting in a delay.
10-16 decision in process & major
10-25 revision submitted urgently, with a response letter of two to three pages
10-26 we
10-30 under review
11-08 RRC, the editor might have been too busy to handle it, or it could be that feedback from two reviewers automatically changed it to RRC
11-21 dip & minor, at that time, all feedback was replied to in detail, thinking it could be accepted directly, but with just one feedback, the timeline was extended
11-22 revision submit
11-25 with editor, with  feedback returning quickly, thinking it wouldn't be sent for review again
12-12 under review, sent for review again, very agonizing, more waiting
12-20 dip & Accept, once again, thank you to the reviewers, thank you to the editor! Hoping for the journal to continue to improve and reach the top soon!

(3) 讚！ | 用户505

The editing efficiency is very high, and the opinions of the two rounds of four reviewers are both pertinent and professional. The main reason for the speed of review is that I am a bit slow in making my own changes. I sincerely hope that BS can continue to improve

(2) 讚！ | aawsw

How is your paper coming along?

(0) 讚！ | sunguoxin

2023.09.24 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | Docter A

2023.09.23 Submitted to Journal

(0) 讚！ | Docter A

This comment is great.

(1) 讚！ | 动物世界

The initial review takes one month, the secondary review takes half a month, and the editing efficiency is particularly high! I hope that domestic journals will continue to improve!

(1) 讚！ | QingZh

Posted on October 8th, minor revisions on October 28th, and accepted on November 7th!

(1) 讚！ | GOBIAS

Excuse me, when you submitted your contribution, did you choose OA or non-OA? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 小强君

May I ask, when you submitted your work, did you choose non-OA or OA? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 小强君

Received: 18 May 2021 
Revised: 29 August 2021 
Accepted: 30 August 2021

It can be said that it was very fast; the editorial department was very efficient. Usually, they directly send it to the reviewers. They gave a major revision after about a month, and after making the changes, it was resubmitted after 19 days. Then, in less than a month, they gave a minor revision, and about 10 days later, it was accepted. The evaluations from the three reviewers were also very detailed and fair. They provided suggestions for improvement and helped me refine the article. It's my first SCI publication, and I'm very happy. I will continue to work hard.

(1) 讚！ | Yixin@

2021-03-17 submit
2021-03-18 with editor
03-21 under review
04-15 required reviews completed
04-25 decision in process & major revise need
05-15 revised submit
First review, second review both took over a month, and the minor revisions in the third review took less than a month. Finally accepted on 07-26.
There were quite a few reviewers, and they were quite professional, providing some in-depth research suggestions. However, the editor seemed busy, sometimes taking two weeks to process the revised submission.
Overall, the speed was fast. This was my first SCI paper, so there were inevitably some irregularities in the process of revision, response, and manuscript submission. However, as long as I answered carefully, made every effort to revise, and used appropriate wording, I believe that articles with opportunities for revision have a high success rate. I hope that my colleagues can all gain something from this experience, and I hope that your journal will continue to improve.

(0) 讚！ | romankk

2020-9-16 Submission
2020-2-21 Reception
Three months after submission, I received revision comments. The experts were very responsible, patient, and provided valuable revision suggestions, as well as some new research ideas. I am very grateful. After completing the revisions, I received an acceptance notice in about a month.

(0) 讚！ | cathay

Submitted on May 24, received the comments on June 24, revision submitted on July 3, and got accepted on July 12.

(2) 讚！ | xiaoyi