It has been 19 days since I submitted my manuscript, and it is still with the editor. I am so worried

(0) 讚！ | 东风富贵

Good luck

(0) 讚！ | 东风富贵

Submitted 15 days ago, still with editor. It's really frustrating, no news yet

(0) 讚！ | 珉林天春

Are they still on vacation?

(0) 讚！ | 珉林天春

Submitted 7 days ago, still with editor

(0) 讚！ | 珉林天春

Please check the email address of the corresponding author. If the co-authors are not receiving these emails, it may be because there is a missing word in the copyright agreement

(0) 讚！ | QQQQQQ

Please translate the following passage into English

(0) 讚！ | 削月泰平

Can I ask what to do if the message "waiting for author approval of converted files" appears after submitting an article to the magazine? Will the corresponding author receive an email?

(0) 讚！ | 嘀哩哩

Could you please advise on what to do if the message "Waiting for Author Approval of Converted Files" appears after submitting an article to this magazine? Will the corresponding author receive an email notification? I have submitted twice and encountered the same situation both times, and I am at a loss on how to proceed

(0) 讚！ | 嘀哩哩

mbio is the flagship of ASM, while microbiome is BMC's. Of course, the former has a better reputation. The latter has a high impact factor because it mainly publishes hot topics like gut microbiota and other popular pseudoscience

(0) 讚！ | 首龚

After my brother, did you receive it?

(0) 讚！ | pubpubCNS

Zheng XX, the scum of the academic community! Reviewing so many papers in a year, everyone should think about it carefully! Can only laugh!

(0) 讚！ | 德云小生

Zheng XX, a disgrace in the academic community! He parades as a top scientist and goes on tours across the country all day long! This person is quite bizarre! Please take a closer look at the many articles he reviews in a year. It's just laughable!

(89) 讚！ | 德云小生

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Research focus: Virology sharing experience: Finally got a top in Zone 1, sharing the timeline: submitted on 3.13, with editor on the same day, under review on 3.20, with editor on 4.12, rejected on the same day, encouraged to resubmit and conduct additional experiments, dragging on for more than half a year, European efficiency haha, resubmitted on 12.7, directly accepted on 12.15

(0) 讚！ | 四风香山

If it's in the direction of microbial ecology, give Microbiome a try first; if it's in the molecular or non-physiological direction, mBio is the first choice

(0) 讚！ | 平原冬莲

Research focus: Microbial experience sharing: Which is better, Mbio or microbiome? If submitting a paper on environmental microbiology, which journal should be considered first?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄以儿

Do we need to write a response letter to the reviewer for resubmission?

(0) 讚！ | 璃月雨石

Do we need to write a response letter to the reviewer for resubmission?

(0) 讚！ | 璃月雨石

Regarding the investment

(0) 讚！ | 水月若枫

Good magazine. High-quality research rejected by PLOS can try MBio. Our laboratory has two cases of PLOS rejection published in MBio.

(34) 讚！ | David zhou

I have the same experience as you... but I am not the first author, just a co-author. PLOS is indeed a bit more difficult.

(0) 讚！ | 安迪.孟菲斯

"Plos pathogens and mBio are indeed often regarded as articles of the same level. We cannot submit to Plos pathogens in our field. In terms of article quality, Plos pathogens is indeed more solid!"

(54) 讚！ | 安迪.孟菲斯

This person is quite crazy. I looked up his resume and he has been bragging about his success all the way.

(0) 讚！ | song

Agree. Both Mibio and PLOS Pathogens are good. They are often compared. But if I have to choose one, I would still choose PLOS. I often hear about cases where papers rejected by PLOS are published in Mibio. But I haven't seen any successful cases of the reverse happening.

(0) 讚！ | song

Research Focus: Innate Immunity
Sharing Experience: Submitting with Editor
Is it necessary to reject the submission on Friday if it coincidentally falls on a Saturday?

(0) 讚！ | 无影东帅