X
    學術可視化工作室RC   登錄   提交文稿
學術英文編修

Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience

期刊標題檢索 FRONT CELL NEUR 最新評論: Another one, received the editorial comments today, minor revision (2023-07-11)


期刊名稱:   ISSN:   主題領域:   影響因子範圍: -
索引:   類別:   開放訪問:   排序方式:

[Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience]您好,您是該頁面的第 64919 位訪客。

期刊簡介
期刊名稱Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
LetPub Score
7.2
50 ratings
Rate

Reputation
7.9

Influence
6.3

Speed
8.9

期刊簡稱FRONT CELL NEUROSCI
ISSN1662-5102
h-index64
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.901.4710.956
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Neuroscience
Subcategory: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
Q227 / 97

自引率 (2023-2024)2.40%自引率趨勢
掲載範囲
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the cellular mechanisms underlying cell function in the nervous system across all species. Specialty Chief Editors Egidio D‘Angelo at the University of Pavia and Christian Hansel at the University of Chicago are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
官方網站http://journal.frontiersin.org/journal/cellular-neuroscience
在線稿件提交http://www.frontiersin.org/submissioninfo
開放訪問Yes
出版商Frontiers Media S.A.
主題領域NEUROSCIENCES
出版國/地區SWITZERLAND
發行頻率
創刊年2007
每年文章數444每年文章數趨勢
黃金OA百分比99.75%
OA Related Info
APC: Yes( USD3295; )
APC waiver:Check Notes
Other charges: No
Keywords: neurobiology、cellular、neural、neurochemistry、neuroanatomy
Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardAnonymous peer review
Web of Science 四分位
2023-2024
WOS Quartile: Q2

CategoryEditionJIF QuartileJIF RankingJIF Percentage
NEUROSCIENCESSCIEQ278/310
索引 (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1662-5102%5BISSN%5D
平均審稿時間 *來自出版商的數據:
來自作者的數據: Slow, 6-12 Week(s)
競爭力 *來自作者的數據:
參考鏈接
相關期刊 【Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience】CiteScore趨勢
自引率趨勢 每年文章數趨勢
作者評論
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。
  • 同一學科的期刊
  • CiteScore趨勢
  • 自引率趨勢
  • 每年文章數趨勢
  •  
    學科內的可信期刊 影響因子
    CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANSH-index: 144

    CiteScore: 873.20
    NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERYH-index: 289

    CiteScore: 137.40
    LANCETH-index: 700

    CiteScore: 148.10
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINEH-index: 933

    CiteScore: 145.40
    Nature Reviews Clinical OncologyH-index: 127

    CiteScore: 99.40
    Nature Reviews Disease PrimersH-index: 48

    CiteScore: 76.70
    NATURE REVIEWS CANCERH-index: 396

    CiteScore: 111.90
    NATURE REVIEWS IMMUNOLOGYH-index: 351

    CiteScore: 93.40
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONH-index: 622

    CiteScore: 48.20
    World PsychiatryH-index: 70

    CiteScore: 64.10
    學科內最受檢索的期刊 頁面查看次數
    MEDICINE640711
    BIOMATERIALS569721
    BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY498329
    Frontiers in Pharmacology486602
    Journal of Materials Chemistry B476057
    JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY475831
    Frontiers in Immunology457853
    COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES419210
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE416280
    Frontiers in Oncology413360
  •  

    Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
    明年預測:
    穩步上升 無變化 逐步下降  刷新
  •  

     
  •  

     


首頁    上一頁    1    2    3    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/3)
  [Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience] 的評論撰寫評論
作者: 一吃就胖小尔卉


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-07-11 20:46:14 評論於
Another one, received the editorial comments today, minor revision
(0) 讚! | 一吃就胖小尔卉

作者: 一吃就胖小尔卉


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-07-08 23:09:50 評論於
I replied to one myself, and now there is another "review is ongoing" today. What's going on?
(0) 讚! | 一吃就胖小尔卉

作者: 一吃就胖小尔卉


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-07-05 23:07:29 評論於
Research focus: Neurosciences
Experience sharing: Has everyone been experiencing long review times recently? I have been stuck on an independent review for over a month now and have not heard back
(0) 讚! | 一吃就胖小尔卉

作者: wangrfv56


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 11.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2023-06-13 10:49:18 評論於
The quality of the article has improved.
(0) 讚! | wangrfv56

作者: 雾都丹秋


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-05-07 10:49:42 評論於
I am the same, now, what is the end like, OP?
(0) 讚! | 雾都丹秋

作者: bear2022


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 4.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2023-05-05 18:06:19 評論於
Indeed, the reviewers all agreed, but the editorial department rejected it.
(0) 讚! | bear2022

作者: shjwhg


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2023-04-10 09:52:06 評論於
Currently, Frontiers is facing a public opinion battle. They reject you for any reason, template rejection, without giving you any clear explanation. Be cautious before investing!
(0) 讚! | shjwhg

作者: XIAO油菜花


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2023-02-03 15:09:27 評論於
221202 submission, 230131 acceptance. There were 4 reviewers: 1 reject, 1 acceptance, and the other 2 requested minor revisions. After answering the reviewers' questions regarding the minor revisions, the paper was accepted. The initial reject reviewer did not respond. After another week, the editor decided to publish the paper. The overall efficiency was fast!
(0) 讚! | XIAO油菜花

作者: Elva Ackermann


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2022-11-18 13:42:01 評論於
Hello, may I ask how long it will take to be assigned an editor?
(0) 讚! | Elva Ackermann

作者: 神古景苑


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2022-09-05 11:56:00 評論於
This process is really speechless
(0) 讚! | 神古景苑

作者: ATime233


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 2.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2022-07-31 18:29:16 評論於
The following text translates to English as: "Demands for innovation are necessary; the reviewers and editors are very efficient. After making the necessary revisions, it only took 2 days for them to accept the submission."
(0) 讚! | ATime233

作者: zz


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2022-06-27 05:45:53 評論於
An article on cell regeneration has been accepted for submission. Currently, I am revising another article related to single-cell sequencing. The suggestions from the two reviewers are acceptable this time. The first one is particularly professional and provided many useful suggestions. The second one seems to have less understanding of single-cell sequencing, but still gave some helpful advice. It will probably take two weeks to make the revisions. I haven't returned to my home country yet, so I'm not sure why people in China think Frontiers is not very reputable. Is it because there are too many Chinese researchers? However, I see very few comments on Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience here.
(0) 讚! | zz

作者: 邻家元枫


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2022-02-24 13:26:13 評論於
Review speed: 3.0 | Acceptance rate: 75.0
Research focus: Neurons
Experience sharing: Submitted on October 13 last year, accepted yesterday, $2950
(0) 讚! | 邻家元枫

作者: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2021-12-30 16:34:34 評論於
Issues related to experiments and article writing
(0) 讚! | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

作者: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2021-12-30 15:36:44 評論於
If possible, try to supplement the experiment. If not, carefully consider reasons for defense, but a modest and cautious tone is essential. After all, there is a certain rejection rate even for major revisions
(0) 讚! | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

作者: 八坂篷蔚


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2021-12-28 09:13:15 評論於
What questions do reviewers and journal editors typically ask?
(0) 讚! | 八坂篷蔚

作者: 陶宜三岁啦


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2021-12-25 09:28:45 評論於
The reviewers requested me to conduct additional experiments, but my samples have already been used up or the experiment has ended. Will my paper be rejected if I directly state that my samples have been used up?
(0) 讚! | 陶宜三岁啦

作者: 弹腿碧巧


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2021-12-18 18:05:28 評論於
Could you please confirm if the odds ratio is significant in this journal's clinical retrospective study?
(0) 讚! | 弹腿碧巧

作者: 骏燕三岁啦


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2021-11-08 17:09:00 評論於
Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: Be cautious about submitting. The first review took nearly 2 months, with three reviewers. One of them did not take it seriously and the editor cancelled their review. The other two gave scores of 3-5. However, one of them was hinting at citing a specific review, possibly their own article. The other one provided some irrelevant comments. It seemed like minor revisions were needed and felt okay at the time. After revising, waited for another month, and suddenly both reviewers' attitudes changed drastically, with only a simple rejection saying that it did not meet their expectations. Impression: The review period is too long, reviewers' levels and attitudes are inconsistent, and there may be potential conflicts of interest
(0) 讚! | 骏燕三岁啦

作者: Sandy Bellamy


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2021-06-05 23:09:23 評論於
How long does a typical data review take?
(0) 讚! | Sandy Bellamy

作者: 拂柳紫安


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2020-12-06 11:09:14 評論於
Almost the same, that's how I am, at first I didn't reject, gave two small edits, one edit was returned and the other was marked as inactive, it's a trap, not recommended to invest, wasted 4 months
(0) 讚! | 拂柳紫安

作者: 拂柳紫安


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2020-12-06 10:47:55 評論於
Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 5.0 Experience sharing: Be cautious when submitting to this journal. If you have enough time, feel free to submit. I submitted in August and was not rejected at first. I received minor revisions on October 20th, made the revisions, but then one of the reviewers became inactive. Similar to what others have shared before, it wasn't until December 6th that I was rejected directly. This journal is very unprofessional
(0) 讚! | 拂柳紫安

作者: 璃月香琴


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2020-10-16 17:55:06 評論於
How long does it take from initial validation to editorial assignment? It's been 10 days and there's still no progress
(0) 讚! | 璃月香琴

作者: 平原啸天


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2020-04-26 08:19:53 評論於
Rogue journals charge high publication fees
(0) 讚! | 平原啸天

作者: Carl Lyly


領域: 医学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2019-11-13 22:43:42 評論於
4.3                                                                                                                                157****1993   2018-06-21 post::How many IFs were there in 2017? Thank you all!!!
(0) 讚! | Carl Lyly

首頁    上一頁    1    2    3    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/3)

開始撰寫 [Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience] 的評論:





Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*