Non-OA doesn't seem to be necessary, OA is $4590

(0) 讚！ | 极乐俊誉

Non-OA seems unnecessary, OA is 4590 dollars

(0) 讚！ | 极乐俊誉

Hey, has there been any update on the layout fee news? I just submitted this magazine

(0) 讚！ | 北陆振凯

Boss, has there been any update on the layout fee issue? Just submitted this magazine

(0) 讚！ | 北陆振凯

How is the page charge for electronic publishing calculated if it is not open access?

(0) 讚！ | fuwa81

How much is the page fee for this magazine if it is not published electronically under OA conditions?

(0) 讚！ | 冰可小仙女

It's been a week and I'm still editing there... The soft-hearted editing reviewer accept... I may be rubbish, but you're only a 3-point journal... Please accept me

(0) 讚！ | 月河初灵

Even arranging the editing takes 17 days for this lousy magazine

(0) 讚！ | 努力啊大和怡

How long do I generally need to wait?

(0) 讚！ | 妙珍少女

Statistics generally report the p-value obtained from significance testing methods as P

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC, or Pearson's r) is a widely used measure of linear correlation

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and respectively title them as ":" and ":"

(0) 讚！ | Darlene Pepys

How do we calculate correlation?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄彦露

A few years ago, I submitted my first article in March and it was accepted. It has been over four months since I submitted this time, but it is still under review. It's a little frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | zqgdreamer

Is the layout fee for this magazine really expensive?

(0) 讚！ | 珉林诗筠

After all, the reviewers of German journals are still very rigorous, although the scores have dropped significantly this year

(0) 讚！ | Isaac McCarthy

Although the impact factor for this journal has dropped this year, the reviewer’s comments are rigorous, constructive and helpful.

(0) 讚！ | Landry

There has been an increase, looking forward to the future, what do you all think?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

This journal is now 2.5 points, much higher than last year. Is there any hope of reaching 3 points?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

German work style is very rigorous. Reviewers are very capable, one of them gave me 19 questions with incisive criticism. German magazines, not recommended

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

This journal is quite good, especially the opinions of the reviewers are very professional, rigorous, and nice. Submitted 3 papers, 2 were accepted

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Better not submit it. Germans are too rigorous

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

My heart is waiting!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

This reviewer is an idiot!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

It was not easy to receive feedback, and the result was rejection, the reviewer is completely crazy! A series of questions that are just insane, and many of them are unreasonable. Here is a small excerpt: Two candidate genes were sequenced to identify SNPs. Why was it necessary to sequence if those are known SNPs? How many individuals were sequenced and why this number? How were they chosen? Which parts of the genes were sequenced, the whole genes? Which percentage was covered? The authors state that the 5 SNPs in IL-20 gene are tagging SNPs. How do they know? Do they correspond to tagging SNPs from the HapMap data? This is not mentioned in the manuscript. Why was the case control cohort only tested for putative tagging SNPs of one candidate gene and for only a single SNP of the other gene?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁