Submission received 02 Jul 2024
Submission passed technical check 03 Jul 2024
Editor assigned 03 Jul 2024
1st Revision requested 28 Jul 2024
1st Revision received 21 Aug 2024
2nd Revision requested 23 Sep 2024
2nd Revision received 29 Sep 2024
Submission accepted 19 Nov 2024
Submission is in publishing and rights 19 Nov 2024

(0) 讚！ | Baymax

After 10 months, it finally ended.
2024.1.25 Submitted for review
2024.2.21 First revision
2024.2.22 Submitted revised draft
2024.8.14 Second revision
2024.9.02 Submitted revised draft
2024.10.02 Third revision
2024.10.14 Submitted revised draft
2024.11.20 Accepted for publication, preparing for proofreading!

(0) 讚！ | kelekelekele

On September 15, 2024, the manuscript was submitted. On September 19, it passed the technical inspection without any modifications. The first reviewer provided over thirty comments, and currently, more than ten reviewers have been invited, with five accepting to review and one providing feedback. The editor has been urged for updates, but the manuscript is still with the reviewers. The first round of review was quick, but now it is progressing very slowly.

(0) 讚！ | elias

Hello classmate, I would like to ask how many reviewers are there for your second review, or is it the same reviewer as the first review?

(0) 讚！ | chenchen

I submitted in mid-October and received a template response a week later, requesting revisions to reduce the submission to 10 pages. It quickly entered peer review, with over 10 reviewers invited and two agreeing to review. On November 18th, I received a rejection notice without specific reasons given, along with the feedback from the two reviewers, indicating one rejection and one recommendation for major revisions.

(0) 讚！ | 一粒金丹一粒果

Timeline of rejection for reference:
2024.06.07 Submission
08.14 First revision, no review comments, format is fine, submitted directly
09.20 Second revision, still no review comments, probably no one reviewed and didn't want you to rush
10.07 Third revision, this time there was a reviewer, three comments, submitted after modifications
11.19 Received reviewer comments, rejected
It's too bad, can't they just reject it directly after the first review? Why drag it out for so long and return it multiple times without any review comments, beware of this.

(0) 讚！ | 有雨

Does this journal have to be 10 pages? The template font is so large, I have seen publications that are fifteen or sixteen pages long.

(0) 讚！ | Amdpw

Do we really need 10 pages? The template font is so large, I've already filled up 19 pages in two columns.

(0) 讚！ | Amdpw

The previous invitations to the reviewers were all very fast, but this time it has been a week since the technical check passed and still no invitation. It's frustrating and disgusting.

(0) 讚！ | 块发

Well, the official from Springer who is responsible for publishing this journal replied to me, if I remember correctly, a French woman named Elizabeth Cervini. However, I checked and found that articles have been published in the other journals she is in charge of in November.

(0) 讚！ | NAMOD

Excuse me, is this the one you asked, and is it the official reply to you?

(0) 讚！ | moon2

It has been over a month and I have not received any contract or proof emails. I guess there won't be any chance this year.

(0) 讚！ | NAMOD

Thank you for your message. Congratulations on your acceptance to SIVP.

Currently, we are switching production systems, so there is a delay in receiving proofs. Please bear with us, you should be receiving them over the next few weeks.

(0) 讚！ | NAMOD

How much longer do I have to wait? It took two months to invite reviewers to update their status, so it looks like it's not going to happen this year. It's been already a month since submission, and it's definitely a bit slow.

(0) 讚！ | 神鹰哥

Brother, what suggestions did the reviewers give for your article at that time?

(0) 讚！ | Welly

Can we have a conversation?

(0) 讚！ | Welly

No, it's been a month and I haven't received any copyrights or proofs. The official website hasn't updated any articles for a month either. In the past, Lethub would usually send proofs within a month at most, but I guess they are not planning to release any new articles this year. The worst case scenario is that we may have to wait until February next year. Please refer to the time it takes for an article to be accepted and published in this journal.

(0) 讚！ | NAMOD

Update: Received reviewer comments for the 11.1 edition, the current status remains unchanged as "under review." Should we continue to invite reviewers in the future or what should we do next?

(0) 讚！ | hellosci1

The withdrawal of the submission has been requested.

(0) 讚！ | berk阿泉

Don't submit!
Don't submit!
I submitted in March, asked for it to be revised into double-sided in July, and waited another 4 months and still haven't found a reviewer.
Damn it, it's been delayed for 8 months.
Whoever submits is just asking for trouble for themselves.

(0) 讚！ | berk阿泉

Do you have any proof?

(0) 讚！ | moon2

How to handle it if the text is too long? My LaTeX compilation results in exactly 10 pages.

(0) 讚！ | Sumr

"How is your paper coming along, are you making progress?"

(0) 讚！ | Sumr

What does this mean? After the first round of revisions, it was rejected by the editor again? Wasn't it already approved by the editor before peer review? Why was it rejected by the editor after revising according to the reviewer's comments?

(0) 讚！ | smli10

Objectively speaking, if you have just submitted to this journal, I would not recommend it. I have been submitting to it since last year, and it took over a year for a reviewer to finally accept. During this time, there were several instances where reviewers did not provide feedback for revisions, and when asked, they simply requested a shorter manuscript. However, my manuscript already met the journal's requirement of being under 10 pages.

(0) 讚！ | zh...