Research Focus: Sharing Experience in Wound Healing: Surprisingly slow, submitted in May, revised twice, still Under review

(0) 讚！ | 博文少爷

Write a letter to the editor requesting an extension

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The time for major revisions of SCI papers, due to the need to conduct additional experiments, generally takes no less than two weeks and can last up to the specified time limit of 90 days. Minor revisions typically take 10-20 days. The deadline can be extended based on individual circumstances

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to apply for an extension?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

When is the deadline for my submission? Can the deadline be changed? Is the deadline the actual date that the journal requires?

(0) 讚！ | 破戒阳平

3 point edge, hoping to remain stable, a slight increase is also good

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0 experience sharing: Submitted on August 11, 2014, rejected on September 11, I feel the speed is very fast, with two reviewers, one reviewer gave very good comments. The other one disagreed, he thought the disadvantages of NPWT outweighed the benefits, and asked me to read two meta-analyses and reviews proving this point (is he one of the authors of these two articles???). Overall, I feel the efficiency of the journal is quite high

(0) 讚！ | 东海邦威

The review period is very long, about 3 and a half months. I originally felt hopeless and thought about submitting to another journal, but then I received some news. Three reviewers raised many questions, and after a long 3-month revision process, it was finally accepted. However, the follow-up work is still very slow. Students who are in a hurry to graduate are not suitable for submitting to this journal

(0) 讚！ | 伏魔绮晴

The review process is slightly longer, so please be cautious when submitting!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

2012:2.75

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Can we make it to the top three next year? Let's discuss

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Bullish, if it rises again tomorrow, it is expected to break through 3 points

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

It's difficult

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁