Sharing a timeline of a recently published article for reference:
2023.1.29 Submission
2023.2.6 Inviting reviewers
2023.5.15 Decision
2023.5.29 Revision
2023.6.10 Resubmission
2023.6.24 One review received, waiting for the other reviewer's feedback
2023.8.6 Editor couldn't wait any longer, Accept
2023.8.17 Online

(68) 讚！ | PatrickPei

High efficiency, replies are generally processed within one day

(100) 讚！ | 白衣飘飘

The journal's efficiency is extremely low, reviews complete can't stand for two weeks

(3) 讚！ | 123

Editor believes that the content of this article can not be of interest to readers, directly refused.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

I gave a minor repair and then published it directly online. It was quite smooth, and I swept the other journals to be rejected.

(2) 讚！ | wnn201289@sina.cn

world journal of microbiology & biotechnology Reviewer generally 2-3 months, about 1.5 before throwing two journals rejected, close to graduation, the instructor has been worried about my graduation problemWas stuck in the SCI article, encouraged to change the other places according to the opinions of the rejected journals, and changed to the journal. The speed is very fast. The first-instance is one month. The opinions are overhauled, but there are not many opinions on the review comments. The tutor does not want toI was eager to make changes and changed it for three weeks. After the revision, I accepted it in a few days. From submission to acceptance for about 2 months, I received it before I graduated. It was a lot easier.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

I submitted on January 31. I feel the quality of the papers in this journal is still good, so it’s a shame that it has been changed from SCI to SCIE. I received the review comments on April 5, major revision, completely unexpected. There was one reviewer, gave me 5 comments and 6 weeks for review, basically asking me to rewrite the whole paper. I resubmitted on May 14 and the comments were back on May 22, minor revision. The editor only took one week to reply, and didn’t list any major problems, mostly just asking for a more elaborated description of the results. I thought it would take at least half a month for the review, because the paper probably would be sent to the original reviewer as this was major revision. I did not expect that the editor actually made the decision directly, perhaps because he saw that I revised the paper very carefully. So when I saw the review comments, more than 2 weeks had passed. I was given 4 weeks for this minor revision. I resubmitted on June 12, after again carefully revising the entire paper.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

5.30 select, 6.3 is rejected, the reason is not given one, really depressed!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

and bio_apai selectd for the journal for the first time, selectd on May 24, rejected on May 28; no change of opinion, no death!I think I can write okay!Depressed in ing!But immediately let the change!Not wasting time is at least a comfort!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has only been used for 4 days from submission to rejection. It is recommended to select springer plus of springer, saying that it will not reject the draft; it is surprisingly quick, but it does not waste time, but it is not given.It is very uncomfortable to modify the comments.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

09 Two articles in the middle of the year, now the review speed is fast, and IF is going up, continue to select!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The journal is really fast, and it will be revised in two months. The revised period of 6 weeks will be received soon after the repair.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.springer.com/chemistry/biotechnology/journal/11274

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Editing is very responsible

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Oh, it’s very fast, so happy, I edited the reply very quickly when I selectd, and the draft was very fast.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I feel that the editor is not responsible.Three opinions: Two clearly agreed to publish, one apparently did not read the original text and directly commented a few words, and the result was rejected.Looking for the editor rebuttal, directly refused a sentence.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名