Does this journal cost money?

(0) 讚！ | 小兔子

Hello, could you give me an editing email address? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | QearJing

Could you please provide me with a reminder email address?

(0) 讚！ | QearJing

Hello, could you please provide me with an edited email? I need to rush a submission, but I found out that the original editor has resigned, and I can't find the email now. Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | QearJing

The review comments were provided within 40 days of submission, which was quite fast. The two reviewers were very professional, and their questions and suggestions for revisions were also very professional. The feedback on wind engineering aspect was quite good, despite the low score

(0) 讚！ | gentleman006

How long does it usually take to receive feedback on a manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 小兔子

It has been almost 4 months since I submitted my work, and I have not received any response. No one has replied to my emails requesting an update on the status of my submission

(0) 讚！ | 小兔子

The original text is already in English.

(0) 讚！ | elrie

Try adding a "D" after the number and see.

(0) 讚！ | Acc123

In the first month of submission, I was asked to modify the format. After making the changes and resubmitting, I waited for two months but the submission information disappeared. I couldn't find the paper information even after entering the password. I wrote three emails but got no response, and I made a phone call but nobody answered. It was a waste of four months.

(0) 讚！ | zhaodesheng

The speed of the review is neither fast nor slow. When encountering good reviewers, their opinions are sharp and directly address the key points. However, it took a long time to find reviewers. After three and a half months, feedback was received from three reviewers, but only one had comments. They provided two weeks to make revisions, and after a serious response, the reviewer agreed to accept the submission the next day. The editor-in-chief agreed to accept it a week later.

(7) 讚！ | Acc123

There are too few reviewers. I have inquired about the status several times, and they all said they couldn't find any reviewers. They can't recommend domestic reviewers, and the process is slow. The feedback is average, but it is easier to get published.

(1) 讚！ | devil

It is a non-mainstream journal, the article quality is relatively average, the review cycle is too long, and the review comments are too simple, with only a few perfunctory words. It is not recommended to submit.

(0) 讚！ | energy1122

I tried submitting to this journal once, but the editor rejected it after five days, saying that the language was not good. Later I polished the language, and submitted to the Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics. It was accepted after three rounds. Https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19942060.2017.1281845. Maybe because my information is in the WAS system from that submission, WAS has invited me to review their papers. I have reviewed two papers so far. Overall, the quality of the papers is good.

(0) 讚！ | 齐德隆东墙

The journal is good, and it is quite professional in terms of wind resistance.It is the publishing house that is too small, resulting in a low review of the paper.Welcome QQ group 785268896

(0) 讚！ | Snowman

风沙支挡工程

(0) 讚！ | 擦擦擦擦擦

Research on wind and sand problem, the review speed is very fast, and the recruitment is fast.

(3) 讚！ | cj

Research on wind and sand problem, the speed of review is very fast, and the application is fast.

(2) 讚！ | cj