Is wetland restoration really effective in speeding up the recovery process?

(0) 讚！ | 谢猪猪

Submitted on August 20th, accepted on December 15th, and published on January 17th of the following year. Non-OA (Open Access) was chosen. The revision process included major revisions, minor revisions, and acceptance.

(129) 讚！ | 科研小石头

I reviewed some manuscripts for this journal. Judging from the number of submitted articles each year and the number of final acceptances, the acceptance rate fluctuates around 35%. The turnaround time depends on the processing efficiency of editors and reviewers. The status of with editor lasts short for the editors, who make the process fast and make a decision within 2–7 days. However, for the slow editors, it could be as long as two months. The duration of under review depends on the speed of reviewers, rejection-redistribution speed and so on. This journal has a large number of editors, and the assignment of articles to efficient editors determines the publication cycle. As authors, we have limited ways to control the turnaround time, but it is not impossible. For example, the wetland conservation, wetland restoration, and constructed wetland columns of this journal are very efficient and have a short cycle. You can prioritize these columns based on the content of the article. However, Wetlands in the developing world may be a column with a long cycle and a small number of papers. But the opinion is for reference only, it should depend on your own article~! When a thing is scarce, it is precious. Finally, the review system of this journal is still very strict, and the editors are also quite professional. It is possible acceptance in first review, minor revisions sent for second review, changing reviewers in the second review... Anyway, such a thing as submission of papers is like shooting a basket in NBA that just shoot and let it go with the wind whether you can make it or not.

(11) 讚！ | cyrccc1226

The editor of this journal is super junk. From the changes in the impact factors of this journal in recent years, you can know that no one will pay attention to it. Doctors don’t select. Masters don’t fall into this trap. I hope everyoneSee, don't waste everyone's time!

(6) 讚！ | 书生

This journal is more junk, and it is not recommended for everyone to contribute.Below the average impact factor, the doctor is not enough, the master's degree, and it will delay you a lot of time.The review is more complicated, and the impact factor of 1.8 afflicts you for more than 6 months. It is too unworthy, so it is not recommended!

(6) 讚！ | 书生

submitted a model article, sent to the external audit about 1 week after the submitment, 5 reviewers in the external audit, 3 rejected, 2 comments, and 3 external auditsmonth.More than 20 comments, the editor asked for overhaul, and the overhaul reply wrote 10 pages.Recruited directly after 7 days of repair.It took 5 months from submission to submission.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Reviewing speed is slightly slow

(0) 讚！ | hxfan

The review period is slightly longer. After all, it is a bimonthly journal. There are not many publications in a year. The estimate of irrigation is enough.The #ISS of the

(0) 讚！ | wetland

It is too slow, and the editors for more than two months are not sent for review. I don’t know why... I have to refuse it!

(0) 讚！ | wetland

Journal Homepage: http://www.bioone.org/page/wetl/aims

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

read the comments on the Internet soon, the draft is submittedNow two months have not yet been submitted for review, the status is still with editor!It’s speechless, and I’ve sent an email to the editorial department and I haven’t heard back!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The speed of reviewing the journal is still ok, and I have about one and a half months to review the results.Only the writing ideas, data, etc. that appear in the article are similar to the articles already published by the instructor, so they are rejected!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

About the article on wetland plants purifying water bodies, selectd, and now 33 days after the review comments are revised, the feeling is ok.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Specialized wetland journal. Any paper related to wetland biology can be submitted here. The journal likes studies on wetland birds and has published many related articles. Generally, the review comments are returned 3 to 6 months after submission. A lab member has submitted for this journal. The journal has many papers reporting large-scale field surveys. The impact factor is around 1.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名