Submitted on January 2nd, 2024
Under review on January 9th, 2024
First review returned on February 29th, 2024, with two reviewers, one provided 5 comments, not many changes were made, the other reviewer provided 18 comments, resulting in many changes, very detailed review.
Revised on March 13th, 2024
Accepted on March 18th, 2024

The overall process was very fast, focusing on AI + weld defect detection task, hoping to improve further

(0) 讚！ | Wanglaoban

Posted on April 23rd, it took more than twenty days in the editor's hands before being sent for review. 
On July 5th, the review comments were received. 
On July 17th, the revised manuscript was submitted. 
On September 7th, the second review comments were received, with minor revisions required. 
On September 8th, the revised manuscript was submitted. 
On September 9th, it was accepted.

(0) 讚！ | sdprince

I have submitted to many journals, and this is the first time I can't help but comment.
It's really terrible!
Firstly, it's slow! There has been no news for about four or five months.
After waiting for almost 5 months, it got rejected. The rejection letter only had one sentence: "The reviewer's comments do not recommend publication."
I even sent an email specifically requesting the reviewer's comments so that I could make improvements based on them.
No one responded. I even suspect if it was actually under review or if the editor just made it up.
I will never submit to this garbage journal again. It's just a waste of time.

(2) 讚！ | mseabcdefg

November 10, 2021 Post
March 31, 2022 under review
Almost 5 months already.

(0) 讚！ | Hegh

Does this journal charge a submission fee?

(0) 讚！ | 陌上吟歸雪

5.20: submission; 9.14: major revision required (14 days). A total of two reviewers, one reviewer almost raised all language problems, and the other one raised two professional questions; 9.28: revised submission; 11.26: Minor revision required. There was one reviewer, the main problem he raised was about language, asking us to modify the title of the paper and the usage of abbreviations in the paper; 11.30: Revised submission; 12.10: 8:40 in the evening, the email notifying the acceptance was received. The whole process lasted for more than 6 months, which was not short, but the reviewers and editors were very serious, and every grammatical error could be pointed out. A very pleasant submission experience!

(1) 讚！ | 我与春风皆过客

The direction is welding, the review speed is average, and it underwent a revision in the middle. The editors and reviewers were still very serious and responsible, and the review opinions are professional and in-depth. The relevant experiments need to be aligned with ASME and ASTM standards.

(0) 讚！ | 太叔余商

Half a year or with editor

(0) 讚！ | 小猪

A journal that is super slow, I have been submitting it for 6 months now. After the period of major repairs and minor repairs, the minor repairs have been returned for 15 days, and the editors are invited to graduate.哎, special slow

(0) 讚！ | qian

Welding in the World publishes a range of topics in the field of welding. I attended the IIW International Conference and presented at one of its sessions, and then my paper was recommended to Welding in the World. The next step was the normal submission process: uploaded the manuscript online, with the main text and the figures uploaded separately; I was asked to revise the paper after 2 months; after revision it was published by Springer. The speed of review and publication is acceptable.

(2) 讚！ | qidan0903@126.com