I have been waiting for the editor for almost a month and a half, the associate editor expressed apologies for the delay, and today asked me to submit to Materials Science & Engineering A.

(0) 讚！ | hucuexue

Met with the kind-hearted editor and reviewers, let's share the process together.
Submitted on 9.1, with editor on 9.4, under review on 9.14.
Major revision on 10.17, received feedback on 10.26, under review again on 10.28, accepted on 11.6.

(0) 讚！ | 星辰

不动地站在原地。

(0) 讚！ | Gavin2017

How are you doing now? Have you submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | hucuexue

People who are in a hurry to publish should never submit to this journal, as it has been almost a month since the editor received the manuscript and there is still no response. It would be better to reject it early for me, it's really annoying.

(0) 讚！ | hucuexue

Sure, thank you!

(0) 讚！ | Gavin2017

I have canceled the upload anyway, so it doesn't matter much.

(1) 讚！ | hucuexue

Hello everyone, I would like to ask for some advice. During the technical review, the editor mentioned that images and tables should not be placed at the beginning or end of the manuscript, but instead should be embedded within the manuscript. Does this mean that we do not need to upload images and tables separately? Thank you for your help.

(0) 讚！ | Gavin2017

How are you doing, OP? How many reviewers have you got now? The second reviewer for me has been over 30 days and still hasn't reviewed the manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | 7k7k

Wear journal is a well-established classic publication with high requirements for articles. I have tried several times before, but all ended in failure. Fortunately, this time the research work was done thoroughly, and some small innovations were added. One special feature of this journal is self-audit by the editors. Initially, it went through less than ten days of review with the editor before being sent for peer review. When I received the reviewer's comments, the editor raised a pointed question which required two rounds of revisions. The process was relatively fast.

Timeline: May 9th, submitted to the journal; May 19th, under review; June 12th, major revision (20 days for revision); June 25th, submitted to the journal (with editor); June 28th, major revision (the editor may have found the answers to his questions unsatisfactory and requested further revisions, 15 days for revision); July 11th, submitted to the journal (with editor); July 21st, accepted.

(0) 讚！ | w

Does anyone know how long the journal gives reviewers to review the manuscript? Why hasn't the second reviewer reviewed it even after 30 days?

(0) 讚！ | 7k7k

Have you received any news in these past two days?

(0) 讚！ | zyyy03

Submitted on the 14th, no response yet, with aditor.

(0) 讚！ | ppu4140109

Has anyone recently invested in wear? Why has it been almost a week at the editorial department and the status has not been updated?

(0) 讚！ | zyyy03

My article has been published online for 2 months and has not been indexed by SCI. Has anyone encountered this situation before? How can I solve the indexing issue? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | rockrider

QQ, 961664675

(0) 讚！ | ppu4140109

Today, finally, it's under review! It's really not easy. 
I hope for good luck, to have a chance for revision. 
On April 10, 2024, the first submission was made, after nearly 2 months of pre-review by the (Japanese) associate editor, it was rejected for resubmission; revised on June 27, 2024, and finally entered the under review stage on August 4, 2024.

(0) 讚！ | lffzyr

Finally received, total time spent 11 months.

(0) 讚！ | 麦田里的汤姆猫

Finally received, it took a total of 11 months, but the reviewers have not reviewed the manuscript yet.

(0) 讚！ | 麦田里的汤姆猫

It has been 7 months since the revision was sent back for review. After the major revisions were made and submitted to the journal, it has been 7 months and it is still under review. Did the reviewers really have unexpected events? The editor is also not taking any action, despite being reminded three times, they only know how to say sorry~

(0) 讚！ | 麦田里的汤姆猫

It's still early, we basically start in 2-3 months.

(0) 讚！ | 麦田里的汤姆猫

So slow, it's been a month already, still with editor.

(0) 讚！ | yinlo

w.e. generally two months or longer

(1) 讚！ | 麦田里的汤姆猫

This morning (06.23), I received an email from the associate editor, who gave the suggestion of "reject and resubmit" (although the system shows Reject). I need to revise the manuscript and resubmit it as a new submission, explaining the revisions in the new Cover letter.

I feel that the editor is quite good, and the tone of the email is polite and gentle, especially the first paragraph of the feedback on the revisions (a total of 8 suggestions) which apologizes for the delay in the pre-review process. It seems that the editor is considerate of the authors.

I appreciate the editor for giving me a chance to resubmit, and I will do my best to make the necessary revisions in order to hopefully pass the external review and be accepted (after revisions).

(0) 讚！ | lffzyr

Still pending review to date! It is still in "with editor" status, from 04.19 until now! However, after seeing the comment on the 67th floor mentioning the possibility of self-review by the editor, I hope that after waiting for over a month, it can finally be successfully submitted for review through editor self-review!

(0) 讚！ | lffzyr