Envy. I submitted to another journal with a similar name before, and the first round of reviews was acceptance + minor revisions (but with many comments, the reviewers were very thorough). However, it went through two more rounds of reviews: in the second round, the reviewers provided many new comments; in the third round, the associate editor couldn't take it anymore and said to just let them know if the reviewers' comments had been addressed, and if they had, the paper would be accepted directly.

(0) 讚！ | Hydro-Man

I submitted my paper in September last year, and it is still under review. I have sent three emails, the first two received official responses, but the third one was ignored. Be cautious when submitting.

(0) 讚！ | 独为

The old-established journal in the field of water resources, I was lucky to have a very fast review speed this time, and all three reviewers were very friendly. Originally, it could have been returned for revisions within a month, but due to various reasons, it was delayed for half a year. However, it can also be considered a blessing in disguise. Finally, I wish everyone to achieve more results!

(1) 讚！ | Simon0990

There is no need to delete at all, these are all email templates. I didn't even bother with more than 10,000 English words and still received them.

(0) 讚！ | Rainmoon

The prestigious journal in the field of environmental science and water resources undoubtedly. After the first submission, it took over a month to receive the revisions. One reviewer suggested acceptance directly, while the other two provided a total of over ten comments. The editor-in-chief expressed great interest and ultimately approved the revisions. It was a bit unusual for the revisions to be accepted without further review after just one week, but it was a smooth process. This is the first time encountering such a journal.

(0) 讚！ | Rainmoon

How long does it take from submission to acceptance?

(0) 讚！ | momo_l

Very good, and also fast.

(1) 讚！ | wnx

I have submitted two articles to this journal, and both times the first review took over a year. Please be cautious when submitting your manuscript

(0) 讚！ | wxmqhz

Just wait, my submission will be on August 3, 2022 with number 500+, the first revision will be at the end of September 2023, and the final acceptance date is at the end of December 2023

(0) 讚！ | wxmqhz

This journal is very luck-based. It mainly depends on whether reviewers accept the manuscripts. Once it goes to external review, it really becomes a matter of luck. If reviewers don't accept the manuscripts, we can only keep inviting. (Right now, the status jumps every two months. I am afraid that they will only invite reviewers every two months, crying.jpg). I have submitted over a thousand manuscripts, and it is still under review. Recently, this journal invited my senior to review the manuscripts twice, with the serial numbers around 1,200 and 1,500. I don't know if I can still wait for the feedback later. I won't even ask for revisions, I just hope they can return them to me

(0) 讚！ | 白

It has been a whole year, and it is still under review

(0) 讚！ | 科研小88

Submitted in early August, it has been a month for external review. It has been seventy days, and the UR status has not changed at all... The reminders only get very official replies. I don't know if it's because the word count is too high, but it feels so slow, frustrating

(0) 讚！ | 白

This requirement is not absolutely strict. I recorded two articles, both of which had more charts and exceeded the word count by several hundred words. I explained this to the editor and did not mention this issue again.

(0) 讚！ | Banana姣

I want to ask, what happened in the end? How long did it take to invite the reviewers? Were you finally accepted?

(0) 讚！ | emoon

Under review is good enough, I am still waiting for the reviewer to be invited.

(0) 讚！ | emoon

I submitted an article to this journal in 19, and the review process was very slow. However, this time it was super fast, I absolutely love it! I submitted on September 5th, received minor revisions on October 12th, and it was accepted on November 8th. It was incredibly swift! Excellent, I recommend everyone to give it a try!

(0) 讚！ | Banana

Is "editor assigned" the next step after "under review"? It has been in the "under review" status for over a month. Is it still necessary to persist?

(0) 讚！ | LL

I want to ask, if a form counts as 300 characters, should the number of characters in the form itself be counted separately?

(0) 讚！ | Achilles0223

My invitation to be a reviewer came two months later, and then it was sent for review after a few days. This journal works in such a way that it is relatively slow in the initial stages, but there is still hope once it reaches the review stage.

(0) 讚！ | ysw_water

After a full two months, it suddenly changed from "editor assigned" to "reviewers invited". Could this be an automatic change in the system status? How long does this state usually last? Is the editor still alive? They don't even respond to emails! This journal is really frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | emoon

Oh my god, this is too much of a rip-off.

(0) 讚！ | liu congmin

I have been on a diet for a week.

(0) 讚！ | liu congmin

It has been over two months in the hands of the editor before being sent for review, and the external review has also been almost a month. There is still no result.

(0) 讚！ | HAHA

How long have you been waiting? Mine has been 18 days already.

(0) 讚！ | emoon

How long does it usually take to be assigned an editor? What factors can affect this time? Does a longer time mean that the journal receives a lot of submissions?

(0) 讚！ | liu congmin