How is it going now? It's been over two weeks since I submitted it and the editor's date has been changed twice, but the status hasn't changed

(0) 讚！ | 洞洞幺

The chief editor passed it to the deputy editor, and next is with editor, under review

(0) 讚！ | tzxxyk

It's already the 18th. Is the editor invited?

(0) 讚！ | ZJUTYYY

The final paper of the master's degree is submitted to this possibly slower journal, with real-time updates on the submission progress.
Submitted: 12th April
With editor: 13th April
Editor invited: 14th April
I'd like to ask, is the next step to send for review? Or is this step about inviting a new editor?

(0) 讚！ | ZJUTYYY

How long does this dip usually take? Feeling anxious now that the reviewer has finished the dip phase

(0) 讚！ | 接accept

It's been many days since I was invited to edit for the deity, but nothing has happened. What should I do?

(0) 讚！ | Thross

Can this journal only have one first author and one corresponding author? Can't they be co-first authors or co-corresponding authors?

(0) 讚！ | cyt160

In mid-2020, it was still a first-tier journal. The review process was very fast, as if five reviewers were found, and their opinions were quite professional. The paper submitted by Reviewer 1 was accepted by the editor directly. If you haven't submitted to them in four years, you will be downgraded. Can you give me some advice?

(3) 讚！ | Bingwen

Submitted on December 10th, the status has not changed. Submitted to Journal, how long does it usually take?

(0) 讚！ | 小草999

Character limit, Submitted Revision process details are added in the following comments for reference

(0) 讚！ | Drr. deng

6. 26 Submitted to Journal
6. 30 With Editor
7. 08 Under Review
9. 12 Required Reviews Completed
10. 03 Decision in Process
10. 04 Significant Revision
10. 30 Submitted Revision
10. 30 With Editor
11. 02 Editor Invited
11. 06 With Editor
11. 13 Under Review
11. 23 Review Complete
11. 23 Decision in Process
11. 25 With Editor
11. 27 Minor Revision
12. 04 Submitted Revision
12. 04 With Editor
12. 05 Editor Invited
12. 09 With Editor
12. 10 Decision in Process
12. 10 With Editor
12. 11 Accept

(0) 讚！ | Drr. deng

Submitted to Journal: 6.26
With Editor: 6.30
Under Review: 7.08
Required Reviews Completed: 9.12
Decision in Process: 10.03
Significant Revision: 10.04
With Editor: 10.30
Editor Invited: 11.02
With Editor: 11.06
Under Review: 11.13
Review Complete: 11.23
Decision in Process: 11.23
With Editor: 11.25
Minor Revision: 11.27
With Editor: 12.04
Editor Invited: 12.05
With Editor: 12.09
Decision in Process: 12.10
With Editor: 12.10
Accept: 12.11

(5) 讚！ | Drr. deng

I used a three-line table format, which I found to be quite good, and I have consistently used this format for subsequent revisions

(0) 讚！ | Queen's University

All charts are placed at the end

(0) 讚！ | Queen's University

This journal has a small number of articles, but it has a good reputation. The formatting requirements are high, and it took two or three rounds of formatting changes before being with the editor after submission. Then it took about two and a half months for the initial review? That's really unreasonable, right? After submitting the revised manuscript, it became under review for about a month, and then was accepted directly.
Submitted in early January, accepted at the end of August, a total of eight months, too slow, causing delays.
It is recommended to be cautious. Especially for those in a hurry for awards or graduation, consider other journals

(0) 讚！ | Queen's University

I would like to ask, is it necessary to submit the revised manuscript in Word format? Can it be in LaTeX?

(0) 讚！ | liyangke

Also, I would like to ask: Does this journal send confirmation emails to every collaborating author? If some authors do not click on confirmation, will the system send a reminder email to the corresponding author?

(0) 讚！ | liyangke

OP, I would like to ask a question: (1) When submitting a revised manuscript, should all the figures and tables be placed at the end of the references, rather than in the main text? (2) Is it necessary to submit three separate tables with the Response Letter? Can a traditional text-based response be accepted? Thank you!!!

(0) 讚！ | liyangke

Sorry to bother you, OP, I have a question to ask: when submitting a revised manuscript, should all the figures be placed after the reference list? Instead of being in the main text? Also, is it necessary for the Response Letter to be in the form of three tables? Can a traditional textual response be acceptable? Thank you!!!

(0) 讚！ | liyangke

Hi, OP! I'd like to ask, when submitting a revised manuscript, should all figures be placed after the references rather than in the main text? Also, is it necessary to have three columns for the Response Letter? Can a traditional text response be acceptable? Thank you!!!

(0) 讚！ | liyangke

I would like to ask: When submitting revised manuscripts to this journal, should all figures be placed after the reference section rather than within the main text?

(0) 讚！ | liyangke

What's wrong with this journal? Why haven't the editors processed the submissions?

(2) 讚！ | zaozaojue

What's going on with the editor? Why isn't the article being processed?

(0) 讚！ | Chao Yang

People are all numb. I am also an editor invited

(0) 讚！ | zaozaojue

Sharing Recent Progress
10.24 submitted to journal
10.25 with editor
10.27 Returned for formatting changes
10.27 Resubmit
10.29 with editor
10.30 with editor
11.01 Editor invited
Is there hope for review now? Several of my previous submissions were rejected outright. Why did it change from "with editor" to "editor invited" in this journal? First time submitting to SCI

(41) 讚！ | zaozaojue