Two editors, both providing positive feedback, have a fast review speed and are very meticulous in their review process. Their feedback is essential.

(0) 讚！ | syzz

4.11 submit
5.27 major revision
9.9 minor revision
9.13 acceptance
The overall speed of the journal is very fast, and the reviewers' comments are very professional.

(0) 讚！ | bunniesflyyy

Hello, I would like to ask if this journal requires both reviewers to reject the submission in order for it to be rejected by the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 李大山

Submit for review in about a week.

(0) 讚！ | Tallon

Hello, may I ask how long it will take for the submission to be reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | 李大山

Hello, I would like to ask how long have you been in the "with editor" status approximately?

(0) 讚！ | 李大山

I would like to ask, what is the situation when the date with the editor changes once?

(0) 讚！ | 李大山

Submitted on May 18
Major revision on June 21
Minor revision on July 19
Accepted on July 30
Accepted in less than two and a half months, one reviewer was positive and one was negative, the review process was fast and the editorial handling was also fast.

(0) 讚！ | Tallon

Hello, I would like to ask if this journal has strict word count requirements. I noticed that it states that the word count should not exceed 8000 words.

(0) 讚！ | 李大山

How long does it take for the review? It's been almost a month for me

(0) 讚！ | zgmm

I was hired right after writing a comment, so happy

(0) 讚！ | jay_j

11.27 Submission
1.1 Minor revision
3.23 Minor revision (really minor, just one reviewer asked me to add a sentence, waited for a month)
3.24 Submitted again
Quite lucky, the first draft was a minor revision, two reviewers in total, the second draft was a bit crazy, only one comment, the reviewer took almost one and a half months, hoping for a good result soon

(0) 讚！ | jay_j

2024-1-3 Submission
2024-1-6 with editor
2024-1-8 under review
2024-2-17 Required Reviews Completed
2024-2-20 Reject

(0) 讚！ | tammy

After 8 months of review and revision, it is finally accepted. The overall speed is relatively slow, but the two reviewers provided great suggestions that greatly improved the article! The editing speed is also slow, hoping UFUG will get better and better! Aim for the top 1 area of the Chinese Academy of Sciences next year!

(1) 讚！ | 丹丹思密达

Will also be rejected directly after reviewing with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 小小轩

Is this journal reviewed directly or will it be rejected without review?

(0) 讚！ | LITUANTUAN

Hello, will this be rejected without being reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | LITUANTUAN

Hello, may I ask if this journal accepts direct submissions for review? Or will submissions be directly rejected without review?

(0) 讚！ | LITUANTUAN

The journal quality is good and it has a good reputation in the field of urban ecology and landscape architecture! It is one of the top journals~
However, the speed is extremely slow!!! If you are in a hurry to graduate, please refrain from submitting!
I am researching the impact of nature environment virtual reality on the perception of health in the population. In terms of speed, it takes about a year to receive the first review comments and six months to receive the second review comments. For doctoral students waiting to graduate, it is really difficult to bear. This is for reference.

(5) 讚！ | nllyb

How did the latest subdivision, the forestry subcategory, drop down to Zone 1?

(1) 讚！ | sxh

That's quite fast! I saw your article on RG, it's very interesting!

(0) 讚！ | VincentGIS

2020.10.13 Submission
2020.11.27 Minor revision with 2 reviewers
2021.01.19 Accepted

After reading other comments, I realized that I may have been lucky with my submission experience as the processing of my article was relatively fast.

(5) 讚！ | lukaluka

The speed is so slow that it makes me doubt life. It's already halfway through, but the first review hasn't come back yet! Students who are considering submitting to this journal, please be extremely cautious!!!

(2) 讚！ | 扬大彭于晏

Posted on February 9, 2021; Received reviewer comments on April 1, major revisions; Revised on July 1, accepted on August 19.

(2) 讚！ | yuxinyang

My review status is withdrawal, but I am writing "rejection" because there is no item that shows withdrawal. The review process is unbelievably awful. Nine months have passed since my first submission the journal did not deliver the first decision. Despite many reminders, the handling editor did not reply at all. I have never seen such an irresponsible journal. For students (especially Ph.D. candidates in their final year), I strongly recommend that you stop short of submitting to this journal.

(2) 讚！ | urbanplanner