How long does it take for the review? It's been almost a month for me

(0) 讚！ | zgmm

I was hired right after writing a comment, so happy

(0) 讚！ | jay_j

11.27 Submission
1.1 Minor revision
3.23 Minor revision (really minor, just one reviewer asked me to add a sentence, waited for a month)
3.24 Submitted again
Quite lucky, the first draft was a minor revision, two reviewers in total, the second draft was a bit crazy, only one comment, the reviewer took almost one and a half months, hoping for a good result soon

(0) 讚！ | jay_j

2024-1-3 Submission
2024-1-6 with editor
2024-1-8 under review
2024-2-17 Required Reviews Completed
2024-2-20 Reject

(0) 讚！ | tammy

After 8 months of review and revision, it is finally accepted. The overall speed is relatively slow, but the two reviewers provided great suggestions that greatly improved the article! The editing speed is also slow, hoping UFUG will get better and better! Aim for the top 1 area of the Chinese Academy of Sciences next year!

(1) 讚！ | 丹丹思密达

Will also be rejected directly after reviewing with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 小小轩

Is this journal reviewed directly or will it be rejected without review?

(0) 讚！ | LITUANTUAN

Hello, will this be rejected without being reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | LITUANTUAN

Hello, may I ask if this journal accepts direct submissions for review? Or will submissions be directly rejected without review?

(0) 讚！ | LITUANTUAN

The journal quality is good and it has a good reputation in the field of urban ecology and landscape architecture! It is one of the top journals~
However, the speed is extremely slow!!! If you are in a hurry to graduate, please refrain from submitting!
I am researching the impact of nature environment virtual reality on the perception of health in the population. In terms of speed, it takes about a year to receive the first review comments and six months to receive the second review comments. For doctoral students waiting to graduate, it is really difficult to bear. This is for reference.

(5) 讚！ | nllyb

How did the latest subdivision, the forestry subcategory, drop down to Zone 1?

(1) 讚！ | sxh

That's quite fast! I saw your article on RG, it's very interesting!

(0) 讚！ | VincentGIS

2020.10.13 Submission
2020.11.27 Minor revision with 2 reviewers
2021.01.19 Accepted

After reading other comments, I realized that I may have been lucky with my submission experience as the processing of my article was relatively fast.

(5) 讚！ | lukaluka

The speed is so slow that it makes me doubt life. It's already halfway through, but the first review hasn't come back yet! Students who are considering submitting to this journal, please be extremely cautious!!!

(2) 讚！ | 扬大彭于晏

Posted on February 9, 2021; Received reviewer comments on April 1, major revisions; Revised on July 1, accepted on August 19.

(2) 讚！ | yuxinyang

My review status is withdrawal, but I am writing "rejection" because there is no item that shows withdrawal. The review process is unbelievably awful. Nine months have passed since my first submission the journal did not deliver the first decision. Despite many reminders, the handling editor did not reply at all. I have never seen such an irresponsible journal. For students (especially Ph.D. candidates in their final year), I strongly recommend that you stop short of submitting to this journal.

(2) 讚！ | urbanplanner

2020.09.05 First submission
2020.11.24 Rejected, can resubmit after revision
2020.01.21 Resubmission
2020.05.19 Accepted
The journal's review process is very slow, usually taking two to three months. It took a total of nine months from start to finish. If you're not in a hurry, you can submit it.

(4) 讚！ | zionye

Up to now, I have submitted 4 articles, and 2 of them have been published. Because the research direction is relatively narrow, this journal is very suitable. 7 to 8 months after the submission of one article, it was rejected. The editor asked to resubmit it after revision. It took about more than a year before being published. The other one was rejected after review. I revised and resubmitted it, and it was published after three major revisions. After the rejection of the other two articles, they were transferred to other journals. In short, the two published articles were all resubmitted after rejection. It took more than a year, but the quality of this journal is very good. You can consider it if you are not in a hurry.

(4) 讚！ | sxh

Generally speaking, the journal is very responsible and professional. The first review took a full three months. Because the second reviewer had doubts about the article and expressed uncertainty, the editor-in-chief found a third reviewer, so the time was very long. There were lots of comments, which were quite specific and professional. It took a long time to write the rebuttal letter. A total of more than ten pages were written, and minor revision requests were given for the second round of reviews. The reply was written within almost a week. It was quickly accepted afterwards. In general, the process speed of the editor-in-chief should be considered quick, and the requirements for submitted articles are quite high. I think if it keeps such review requirements, the journal's impact factor should gradually continue to rise.

(11) 讚！ | nickbug

A review article entitled "Critical review on the cooling effect of urban blue-green space: A threshold-size perspective ". Submitted in April 2019 and accepted in February 2020. Four reviewers were invited before and after. Although the reviewers gave positive comments, the speed is too slow. The journal has a high influence in Europe. Although its impact factor is not high, it is highly recognized in the field, and it is an old brand journal. The editor in chief was in my department at the University of Copenhagen. It follows a convention in Northern European—too slow! Think carefully to submit if you are in a hurry.

(4) 讚！ | yzw子非鱼

19 June 2018 submitted, 20 June 2018 under review, 15 August 2018 revision requested, 17 August 2018 revision submitted, 18 August 2018 accepted. Overall it is quite fast, but since one of my advisers is the deputy Editor-in-Chief and the other is on the editor board, I wasn’t asked to do a lot of revision. A reviewer even gave "excellent excellent" (yes, two) in the comments. Another reviewer asked for minor revision and made a few comments. After the revision, it must have been directly accepted by the editor and not sent back to the reviewers. My first paper as the first authors!

(2) 讚！ | gallavich

This journal is still very fast, submitted a journal about gardens, very fast, modified twiceEvery time I give a message at the end of a month.The last minor repair, submitted back, after two weeks, acceptd.Received at Editorial Office9 Mar 2018Article revised2 Jun 2018Article accepted for publication19 Jun 2018https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866718301444?via%3DihubWelcome to exchange, QQ group: 785268896

(0) 讚！ | 何必

article on urban heat island effect and land use.A new approach was taken to study the relationship between heat islands and land.The reviewer said that the new method was unreasonable and could not support the subject of the article and the result was rejected.

(0) 讚！ | qtechhebaojie@yahoo.com