投出 on December, 2023
Return with major revisions on April 27, 2024
Revised on May 25, 2024
Accepted on June 16, 2024

(0) 讚！ | ericchy

Due at the end of October, first major revision by the end of February, second major revision in May, and then rejected at the end of May, sent back

(0) 讚！ | Dusk.

The status has changed to submitted to journal. This is the first time I have seen this. It's really surprising

(0) 讚！ | 学术垃圾一号

It's been three or four days since I submitted to the Journal, is that normal?

(0) 讚！ | yiscll

How are you, bro?

(0) 讚！ | wzzww

What's up, bro?

(0) 讚！ | wzzww

The status with the editor has not changed at all since May 6th, 2024

(0) 讚！ | 就想中顶刊

It has been two and a half months since the second review!!!! There has been no response so far, and I have reminded them 6 times during this period, but have not received any useful information in return

(0) 讚！ | dddvsdwd

Under review, will you receive an email?

(0) 讚！ | wzzww

Haven't been hired yet, bro?

(0) 讚！ | wzzww

Have you got the results?

(0) 讚！ | wzzww

Submitted on March 8, 2024, and still "With editor" as of April 12, 2024. Reminded the editor twice, but the status remains unchanged, and no reply email has been received

(0) 讚！ | 就想中顶刊

On October 30, 2023, the manuscript under review for a month and a half with the editor has finally been submitted for review!

(0) 讚！ | dddvsdwd

Sep 12, 2023 Submitted to journal
Sep 13, 2023 With Editor (no change

(0) 讚！ | dddvsdwd

Have you received any response after the reminder?

(0) 讚！ | 三不小和尚

When you see this is an acoustic journal, will it be too biased towards theoretical and physical aspects? Can medical ultrasound research be published? (Without basic experiments, clinical research on ultrasound

(0) 讚！ | 岭南希慕

Since early May, I have been with the editor, but there hasn't been any change even after urging for the manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | allen_hu

May 16th with the editor, it has remained unchanged for so long.

(4) 讚！ | 三不小和尚

It has been 10 days and there is still no movement from the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 三不小和尚

10/13/22 Submission
Review within two weeks
01/03/23 Major revision (1 month)
01/31/23 Revised
Review within one week
02/23/23 Minor revision (two weeks)
02/25/23 Revised
03/12/23 Submission
03/23/23 Accepted
A total duration of 5 months, almost half a year, which is considered acceptable in the field of engineering and manufacturing.
The suggestions from the reviewer are also very nice, clearly improving the quality of the article and inspiring new ideas.

(0) 讚！ | 断电温馨提示

The reviewer was very meticulous and greatly helped improve the article.

(0) 讚！ | zsbsuper

It has been almost two months since the submission, and the first reviewer's review was completed. However, after three more months, the second reviewer still couldn't be found. After urging for an update, only the comments from the second reviewer were returned, and the paper was directly rejected without clear reasons stated. It took five months and one week from submission to rejection, and the returned review comments were incomplete, which is very strange. Originally, I had a good impression of this journal, but I am now disappointed with their extremely low efficiency and incomplete review comments. I am in a hurry to graduate, so I need to be cautious with my submissions.

(0) 讚！ | Suesan

It has been over two months since submission and there is still no feedback from the review. Continuing to wait...

(0) 讚！ | Suesan

The first SCI paper was submitted to AIAA in September 2021, but it was rejected due to mismatched themes. Then, my advisor recommended Ultrasonics, and after formatting modifications, it was submitted. It took nearly ten months, underwent a major revision, and finally, I was very fortunate to be accepted.

October 26, 2021: Submitted online
December 1, 2021: The paper was with the editor for almost a month. After receiving a reminder email, the editor immediately promised to send it for external review and had a very good attitude.
February 26, 2022: Received first-round review with comments from two reviewers. Major revisions were required with a two-month deadline.
April 5, 2022: Revised the paper with thirty comments from the two reviewers. The response I wrote was longer than the paper itself.
July 5, 2022: Sent a second email to urge the editor, who informed me that one reviewer's comments had returned, but the other had not yet. They advised me not to worry and to contact them anytime if there were any issues.
July 10, 2022: Stayed up all night. At seven in the morning, I opened the submission system and was pleasantly surprised to find that the status had changed to "Accepted" directly.

In summary, the reviewers of this journal were very professional, and their questions helped me further improve my work. The editor was also patient and always responded to my progress inquiry emails within a day.

(4) 讚！ | 大锤和小美

The article is about the simulation and experiment of ultrasound brain stimulation.

First submission: 04/Feb/2021
Assigned to editor: 15/Feb/2021
First feedback received: 21/Apr/2021 (Major Revision), given two months for revisions.

Due to personal reasons, an extension was requested.

First revised manuscript submitted: 09/July/2021
Second feedback received: 24/Sep/2021 (Major Revision)
Second revised manuscript submitted: 30/Oct/2021
Third feedback received: 03/Feb/2022 (Minor Revision)
Third revised manuscript submitted: 02/Mar/2022
Accepted: 04/Mar/2022

There were two reviewers, and the first feedback received included over 30 suggestions from both reviewers combined.
The reviewers were very professional and responsible (based on the feedback, it seems like they were genuinely helping me, a struggling student, to improve the quality of the article).

The entire submission process took 13 months, which was a lengthy duration.

(0) 讚！ | hank____