In 2021, I published an article in the journal. Originally, two reviewers reviewed my manuscript, and my article was greatly improved. I have always had a good impression of this journal. In 2024, the journal invited me to review, but I found that the editor only used my opinion for the final review. If an article is reviewed by only one reviewer, it can pose a significant problem. Many journals are facing the awkward situation of not being able to find reviewers. I am still quite worried about the future of this long-standing journal

(0) 讚！ | fafafafa

The submission has been more than 10 days, why does it still show "with editor" status?

(0) 讚！ | 浅笑安然

Submitted on January 28th, after two weeks, the article received extensive revisions with over thirty suggestions from two experts.
The revisions were completed and uploaded on March 1st and were accepted on March 3rd.
This is the fastest journal I have submitted to so far, both the editor and the experts were prompt and efficient.

(0) 讚！ | 水环境菜鸡

Submitted for 112 days, rejected. Both reviewers raised questions that did not require additional experiments and could be addressed through revisions. However, it was still rejected and denied.

(0) 讚！ | 嘀嘀哒哒

Submitted in November 21, experiencing two major revisions and three rounds of review, finally accepted in mid-April 22. The experts were extremely meticulous and careful. It was very beneficial.

(0) 讚！ | lolo

In the second round of review, it took a month to be in the "with editor" status. After another month of being "under review," my minor revisions were finally accepted for publication. The reviewers were truly amazing, helping me with language issues sentence by sentence! Thus, it took over 5 months for this article to be accepted!

(0) 讚！ | fafafafa

The magazine has high language requirements. This is my first toxicology experiment article. It was submitted in early August 2020 and remained in the "with editor" status for a month, then under review for two months. Finally, in early November, it received major revision suggestions. The reviewer's comments were very professional, and it took two months to make the revisions. It has been with the editor for a month now and is currently under review, but I still don't know any news.

I decided to submit to this journal originally because the website of the Journal claimed to have fast response times for feedback, but I didn't expect it to take this long. However, the expert's suggestions were very good, and I feel like I have made progress.

(3) 讚！ | fafafafa

The speed was very awesome, it was accepted after minor revision. Articles with innovations are easy to be published, otherwise it requires a lot of work.

(0) 讚！ | EOT

Editing efficiency is very high. This is the first SCI article of mine. Although there are many ups and downs, the submission process is still very smooth.

(4) 讚！ | insiston

The publication is now very demanding, not good to hit, requires in-depth study of the molecular mechanism of toxicological phenomena, the mechanism must be fully data-proven.

(0) 讚！ | pigger

The journal's language and innovation requirements are very high. There are only a few documents published each year, it is difficult to publish, and the review and editorial response speed is quite fast. The top toxicology journals, one district journals, after allStill not the same

(0) 讚！ | 111

We submitted to Aquatic Toxicology in December 2016. Unfortunately, our manuscript was rejected in February 2017; reviewers were unsatisfied with aspects of the experiments conducted in our study. After we amended our experiments, we re-submitted our manuscript in early June, and it was accepted later that month. This was my first published article, and I feel very lucky that I got published in a journal with an impact factor between 3 and 4.

(1) 讚！ | fenglilili

This journal used to be toxicology top10, with high influence and high editing efficiency. After the submission, the editor with the day, under review, the next day, no delay, less than a monthThere is a first-instance result; the second-instance speed is equally strong.Both research depth and language requirements are high, and there is still some recognition in the field of toxicology.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Received date: 27-2-2013Revised date: 18-3-2013 Cobo delay ~~~Resubmite:12-4-2013Revised date: 21-4-2013Accepted date: 22-4-2013 lasted two months, thanks to Aquatic Toxicology!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

3SubmissionAfter undergoing major repairs and minor repairs, I received the publication three days later.Thanks to the Water Toxicology journal.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Submitted for two weeks to the review results, quite fast, huh, huh.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

A very good journal, ready to select.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The quality of this journal's article is very good. If you submit a manuscript, the language requirements are extremely high.However, the editor has a good heart, even if the language revision does not meet the requirements, the other party will wait.I and a younger brother tossed 4-6 times because of language problems, and finally received.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal has high requirements for language quality, and the article should be new and have a certain amount of work.Although the impact factor is not too high, three points, but it is a regional journal in the industry, with high recognition.It takes strength and luck to make a shot.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Be sure to know if your article meets the direction of this journal before you select.Aquatic toxicology.The story should be complete, at least to a certain degree of new ideas.The language should be clear and the clauses should not be too much.It is best to find a native English-speaking peer to modify.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名