Luca Susmel, the editor-in-chief, is extremely efficient, really excellent, very dedicated, and the submission was under review within 2 hours. The reviewers have high academic attainments, very professional opinions, very efficient, and the paper was directly accepted after a major revision. Thanks to the editor-in-chief and reviewers for their hard work.
2024.02.15 submission
2024.02.28 major
2024.04.25 accept

(0) 讚！ | Godluck@

So fast, repairs were completed in just one week

(0) 讚！ | Liu-Xudong

4.23 rework

(0) 讚！ | 村头二狗

4.23 Returned for repair today

(0) 讚！ | 村头二狗

I am scheduled for review on the 17th

(1) 讚！ | Liu-Xudong

Fast-paced journal, hoping for a good outcome

(1) 讚！ | 村头二狗

Submission on April 19th, 2024

(0) 讚！ | 村头二狗

The review process was quick, and it is possible that what I wrote is related to fracture mechanics. It was accepted after minor revisions

(0) 讚！ | zouliansong

Is it possible for Xiaoxiu to be rejected?

(0) 讚！ | Rachel1991

Hello, may I ask if the submission guidelines mention the need for original data, does that mean the experimental data needs to be packaged and uploaded?

(0) 讚！ | CEIUO

Same question, very urgent.

(0) 讚！ | mvpcky

Dear experts, when submitting, how should the Latex Source file be uploaded? Is it sufficient to upload just the Latex file?

(0) 讚！ | 铁柱同学

The person is dumbfounded. They submitted two papers consecutively. The first paper was rejected by the editor 3 days later. The second paper was rejected by the editor at 5 am the next day. Both rejections were due to the same reason: "Since the proposed approach has not been validated against any experimental/numerical results, the submitted paper cannot be considered for publication."

However, our senior in the research group had two papers accepted without conducting any experiments. I am feeling frustrated. The journal is quite reputable, so it might be because I am not competent enough. I will have to submit again later. It's torturing dealing with the editor!!!!!!

(4) 讚！ | 一碗鸡汤

Hello, I would like to ask if this journal must be typeset using LaTeX. I noticed that when submitting, LaTeX source files must be uploaded. Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | wshang

Submission: 2023.1.3
Review: 2023.1.3
First revision: 2023.1.21
Revised: 2023.3.13
Review: 2023.3.14
Accepted: 2023.4.1
This is the second submission to this journal. The editorial process was fast, and the reviewers were prompt. The journal's efficiency is very high. After one major revision, the paper was accepted directly. The review and re-review process took about two weeks each time. Initially, both reviewers recommended major revisions, providing about twenty constructive comments. The reviewers were thorough and their suggestions were very reasonable, greatly improving the paper. I am very grateful for the valuable feedback from the reviewers and hope that the journal continues to improve!

(11) 讚！ | yy jxsut

2022.12.23 Submitted to the Journal
2022.12.24 Under Review
2023.1.17 Major revision
2023.3.8 Revisions Submitted to the Journal
2023.3.28 Required Reviews Completed
2023.3.28 Accept

Two reviewers provided more than 20 comments, their comments were sharp and greatly helped improve the quality of the article. After making the revisions, the article was directly accepted, and the reviewing and editing process was as fast as always.

(0) 讚！ | rufeng1237

How long is usually given to reviewers for review?

(0) 讚！ | LUXIXIXI

The editing speed is very fast, as for the speed of handling by reviewers, it varies from person to person.

(0) 讚！ | 努力

Has the review speed of this journal slowed down?

(0) 讚！ | LUXIXIXI

Submission 2022.10.12
Under review 2022.10.12
First revision 2022.12.5
Revised 2023.1.5
Under review 2023.1.9
Second revision 2023.1.15
Revised 2023.1.19
Accepted 2023.1.19
After undergoing two rounds of revisions, the first being a major revision and the second being a minor one, the paper was accepted after the modifications. This journal has a fast processing speed, with submissions being reviewed on the same day. There were two reviewers who provided over twenty suggestions. I am grateful to the editor for their good attitude and the high efficiency of the journal. I hope the journal continues to improve.

(0) 讚！ | 努力

2022.8.9 submitted
2022.8.10 under review
2022.9.12 Date updated, still under review
2022.10.10 minor revision - One reviewer gave positive feedback and provided 2 suggestions; another reviewer rejected the paper and gave 5 critical comments.
2022.11.1 Submitted revised manuscript in the afternoon and it was under review the same day.
2022.11.28 Accepted
The editor was efficient and had a good attitude, giving the opportunity for revisions. I made modifications based on the reviewers' comments, and although the process was challenging, I ultimately gained the approval of the reviewers and improved the quality of the article.

(0) 讚！ | hyz@

Okay, thank you! I hope everything goes smoothly for you, just like your article.

(0) 讚！ | Anne3316

Hello, I received three review comments at the same time, so they should have been organized and summarized by the editor before being sent to me together.

(0) 讚！ | 律己而强，勤勉则刚

Because it was out of scope and rejected, I submitted it after 4 p.m., and after having dinner and coming back at 6 p.m., I received the rejection email. The efficiency is quite high, hmm...

(0) 讚！ | Lava_DD

Hello boss, I wanted to ask if the opinions of the three reviewers should be sent to you together or one by one?

(0) 讚！ | Anne3316