I feel that the peer reviewers are very professional, but this journal focuses more on geology. I submitted my manuscript in February and it was only accepted in October. Overall, I feel that the journal's quality is good.

(0) 讚！ | qiqi

Feel a bit watered down. Minor revisions in the first review, with only two reviewers providing very few comments, which altogether didn't even fill up 3 pages of A4 paper. Of course, the comments were quite professional. It took one hour to make the changes, and after submitting it back, it was accepted after a few days.

(0) 讚！ | xscscsccsscscgrrhtntf

Reviewing speed is very fast, the message given within 1 month, refused to post-reported

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

A geoscience comprehensive journal.  The impact factor is above 2. Long articles are not accepted and the length of articles is limited to 2,500 words (excluding references, diagrams, and table descriptions). The first time I submitted, I waited for 2 months and 20 days, the result was rejection, with a request to revise and resubmit. Three review opinions, most of whom thought the argument was not sufficiently well-developed. After the revision, more evidence was added, and all the restrictions were placed in the supplementary files. The reviewers’ comments were taken seriously and answered. The results came back 2 months and 15 days after the resubmit, without need for major modification. In general, the process was relatively smooth. There is no review fee.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名