期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS LetPub Score 6.5
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 7.5 Influence 5.2 Speed 8.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | AQUAT CONSERV | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1052-7613 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1099-0755 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 8.00%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/%28ISSN%291099-0755 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aqc | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | John Wiley and Sons Ltd | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 环境科学 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 隔月刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1991 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 129每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 24.95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1052-7613%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: Slow, 18-36 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Moderate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: MML2021 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 7.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2021-11-20 22:06:35 評論於 I have published two papers in it and I feel it's pretty good. It can be considered a relatively stable journal.(1) 讚! | MML2021 |
作者: Men 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2019-03-29 10:36:07 評論於 The processing speed is acceptable. I met two anonymous peers, Comments of one reviewer was obvious unreasonable, and he kept the tone of arrogance. After a serious reply, the editor accepted it without second revision. It took two months for review, but it took one month for pending decisions. It was the same twice, and it was useless to ask by email. (1) 讚! | Men |
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us