0404 submission
One week later, UR invited 6, rejected 2, and ran away 1.
0529 editor revised with only one reviewer's opinion.
0606 revised.
0607 invited 2 reviewers.
0616 editor accepted directly.
Thumbs up to Maria Jesus Lobo-Castañón editor for efficient handling.
In summary, Talanta is efficient but there are not many reviewers willing to review, all time is wasted in requesting reviewers

(0) 讚！ | wwghs

Can we follow up with the editor after more than half a month?

(0) 讚！ | LetAcc

How long has the with editor been?

(0) 讚！ | LetAcc

2.11 Submit to journal
2.12 With editor
2.26 Decision in processing
2.26 Needing Revision
4.19 Revision Submitted to Journal
4.20 With editor
4.29 Decision in processing
4.29 Needing Revision
4.29 Revision Submitted to Journal
4.30 With editor
5.06 Decision in processing
5.06 Accept
5.09 Online

(1) 讚！ | 尚驰

Have you submitted it for review? How long has it been under review?

(0) 讚！ | 若柏

Updated
2024-04-10 with editor
2024-04-12 accept

(0) 讚！ | evayfang

Update
2024-04-08 revise The editor found some minor grammar and formatting errors, so I need to make some more revisions.
2024-04-09 revision submitted to journal

(0) 讚！ | evayfang

0204 submitted
0205 edit
0206 under review
0406 reject In the case where two reviewers did not clearly reject the paper, the editor Ping Yu did not provide a reason and chose to reject the submission directly

(0) 讚！ | wwghs

2024-02-05 submit
2024-02-09 under review During this period, the editor invited a total of 12 reviewers, with 3 agreeing to review.
2024-03-20 required reviews complete 2 reviewers have completed their reviews.
2024-03-22 review complete Provided with revise. The review comments are from two reviewers and one editor.
2024-04-04 Revision Submitted to Journal

(0) 讚！ | evayfang

My submission was with the editor the next day, it's been a month and there has been no progress

(0) 讚！ | 权哥

With the editor does it take a month and a half? I submitted it at the end of January, it's been almost a month and a half, and there has been no movement. I wonder if the editor is on vacation

(0) 讚！ | snoopy123

It usually takes 1-2 weeks for processing online. Please be patient after acceptance. Before proofreading, you will receive some forms to fill out. After filling out the copyright agreement and other forms, the proofing link will be sent on the same day

(0) 讚！ | 一只小虫子

I accepted on the 23rd, according to the tracking of the email, it has now arrived at the publisher. The email sent by the Elsevier editor said that it is being formatted and edited. There are two small issues that require me to reply to confirm. It has been 4 days since I confirmed, but the status of the article in the tracking link has not changed. Do I need to wait longer? Also, I saw someone else mention that after accepting, there are some online forms to fill out, like benefit declarations and rights transfers. Should I fill these out when it's time for proofreading? Or will a separate email be sent for this?

(0) 讚！ | 李的那个振

Accept proof two days later, proof online two days later

(0) 讚！ | 一只小虫子

There is an editor named Andres D. Campiglia who is very unreasonable. He had us review the manuscript, three reviewers gave major revisions, but the editor rejected it. He seems very unfriendly, beware!

(0) 讚！ | koala

How long after you accept will you be online?? I've been waiting for a week and still haven't received any proof!

(0) 讚！ | 李的那个振

Excluding the one-month wasted in the middle, the entire submission process takes about 4 months, not fast but not too slow. Graduating students who are submitting papers need to manage their time well!!! Reviewers expect innovation and hope for more submissions!

(0) 讚！ | 李的那个振

Dropped from ACS sensors all the way down to Talanta ? Both reviewers' comments were positive. In the first round, there were a total of 22 comments, all regarding content modifications and issues, without the need for additional experiments. Two months were given for revisions. Due to other commitments, the first month passed without reviewing the comments from reviewers. I made the revisions in the nick of time and submitted them in the following month. In the second round of review, the second reviewer provided four additional suggestions and another two months were given for revisions (why two months for just four comments?). It took me 10 days to make the modifications, and after returning the revised version, it was accepted within three days! I am very satisfied with the submission. The associate editor replied promptly to my emails. After all, Talanta is a top-tier journal in the first quartile. This year, many journals have dropped from the first quartile to the second, but surprisingly, Talanta remains strong ?. Graduation is now within reach!!

(0) 讚！ | 李的那个振

9.10 Submitted
9.12 With editor
9.22 Under review
11.7 Review completed (major revision)
1.4 Revision
2.10 Review completed (minor revision)
2.21 Revision
2.24 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 李的那个振

Anyone has been in RRC status for three months? I've urged three times, but no use. Anyone in the same situation?

(0) 讚！ | 000000011111

Is that the vice president of Northeastern University?

(0) 讚！ | Azeroth_qiang

The time for "With Editor" is generally longer because the invited reviewer needs to click on the "Accept Review" link for the system to change the status to "Under review". If two of the invited reviewers in the first round do not accept or reject the review, the editor can only wait a week before reminding them. If there is no response from the reviewers in the second week, the editor will send out a second round of invitations. This is why the time for "With Editor" is usually longer, so please do not blame the editors

(0) 讚！ | qwerty80

May I ask how many reviewers are there?

(0) 讚！ | 亲亲瑶瑶蛋

Is your editor Agata Michalska?

(0) 讚！ | wademvp

Is your editor Agata Michalska?

(0) 讚！ | wademvp